Calculating measurable quantities

The most widely used way to calculate measurable quantities is using Eqs. 2.26, 2.28, 2.30, 2.31, and 2.33. The major advantage of these equations is that they are exact for the set of point dipoles. Hence, the optical theorem (a consequence of energy conservation), 

Other expressions for Cabs have also been proposed. Originally, Purcell and Penn3q)acker [54] used Eq. (2.33) without the second term, but that works satisfactory only in combination with the CM polarizability. Otherwise, physical artifacts occur, such as non-zero Cabs for purely real h. A more advanced formula was proposed [101] based on radiation correction of a finite dipole instead of a point 

Another possibility is to improve Eq. (2.26) using advanced formulations for the interaction term (Sec. 2.4.3.1). In particular, the following expressions naturally follow from the IGT and the FCD  

These expressions may improve the accuracy of the near-field calculation but, unfortunately, this has never been tested. The production codes allow one to calculate the near-field only using the simplest Eq. (2.26). 

The importance of choosing the right expression for G,(r) diminishes with increasing r. In particular, it is easy to show that  

---

Each of the two laws of thermodynamics asserts the existence of a primitive thermodynamic property, and each provides an equation connecting the property with measurable quantities. These are not defining equations they merely provide a means to calculate changes in each property. 

Prompt instrumentation is usually intended to measure quantities while uniaxial strain conditions still prevail, i.e., before the arrival of any lateral edge effects. The quantities of interest are nearly always the shock velocity or stress wave velocity, the material (particle) velocity behind the shock or throughout the wave, and the pressure behind the shock or throughout the wave. Knowledge of any two of these quantities allows one to calculate the pressure-volume-energy path followed by the specimen material during the experimental event, i.e., it provides basic information about the material s equation of state (EOS). Time-resolved temperature measurements can further define the equation-of-state characteristics. 

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. 

Two measured ellipsometric angles T and d at a fixed wavelength and a fixed angle of incidence enable calculation of a maximum of two other properties, e. g. the film thickness and refractive index of a transparent layer. Multiple angle measurements increase the number of measured quantities and hence the number of properties which can be determined for a specific sample, although even under these condi-... 

Natural gas containing 98% methane and 2% nitrogen by volume is burned in a furnace with 15% excess air. The fuel consumption is 20 cubic meters per second, measured at 290°K and 101.3 kPa (or 14.7 psia). The problem is to determine how much air is required under these conditions. In addition, we want to determine the baseline environmental performance of the furnace by calculating the quantity and composition of the flue gas. 

Chemistry is a quantitative science. The experiments that you carry out in the laboratory and the calculations that you perform almost always involve measured quantities with specified numerical values. Consider, for example, the following set of directions for the preparation of aspirin (measured quantities are shown in italics). 

Most measured quantities are not end results in themselves. Instead, they are used to calculate other quantities, often by multiplication or division. The precision of any such derived result is limited by that of the measurements on which it is based. When measured quantities are multiplied or divided, the number of significant figures in the result is the same as that in the quantity with the smallest number of significant figures. 

A final caution concerns the error introduced into the calculated interproton distances. As this depends on the errors of the measured quantities, it is propagated through the calculations according to Eq. for independent and random errors, namely,... 

Interproton distances of 0-ceIIobiose (see Ref. 49) error 0.01 A. Interproton distances of 1,6-anhydro- -D-glucopyranose (see Ref. 49) error 0.01 A. Interproton distances of -cellobiose octaacetate (see Ref. 49) error 0.05 A. Interproton distances of 2,3,4-tri-0-acetyl-l,6-anhydro- -D-glucopyranose (see Ref. 49) error 0.05 A. Error calculations based on the errors of the measured quantities in Eqs. 18 and 21. Interproton distances calculated from the relaxation parameters of the methylene protons. 

During an experiment, a chemist may measure physical quantities such as mass, volume, and temperature. Usually the chemist seeks information that is related to the measured quantities but must be found by doing calculations. In later chapters we develop and use equations that relate measured physical quantities to important chemical properties. Calculations are an essential part of all of chemistry therefore, they play important roles in much of general chemistry. The physical property of density illustrates how to apply an equation to calculations. 

Any of the types of problems discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 can involve gases. The strategy for doing stoichiometric calculations is the same whether the species involved are solids, liquids, or gases. In this chapter, we add the ideal gas equation to our equations for converting measured quantities into moles. Example is a limiting reactant problem that involves a gas. 

Since [n] is a physically measurable quantity and is more directly relatable than the usual SEC calculated Mn and Mw values to the macroscopic viscosity parameters of the polymer solution, a routine SEC-[n] method brings SEC a step closer to practical evaluation of the strength and processibility of different polymer samples. 

This is a relationship between unknown field g and two measured quantities, namely, the distance 5 and time t, provided that we neglect terms proportional to the square of the coefficient a and those of higher order. Besides, this equation contains three unknown parameters, namely, the position of the mass. so at the moment when we start to measure time, the initial velocity, vo, at this moment and, finally, the rate of change of the gravitational field, a, along the vertical. Thus, in order to solve our problem and find the field we have to perform measurements of the distance. s at four instants. If so is known, the number of these measurements is reduced by one. In modern devices the coefficient of the last term on the right hand side of Equation (3.14) has a value around 100 pGal and it is defined by calculations as a correction factor s(vo, g, t, a). In the case when we can let so equal to zero, it is sufficient to make measurements at two instances only. 

In this activity, you will calculate the heat of combustion of the fuel in a candle. The burning candle will heat a measured quantity of water. Using the specific heat of water, the mass of the water, and the increase in temperature, you can calculate the amount of heat released by the burning candle using the following relationship ... 

Van t Hoff introduced the correction factor i for electrolyte solutions the measured quantity (e.g. the osmotic pressure, Jt) must be divided by this factor to obtain agreement with the theory of dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes (jt/i = RTc). For the dilute solutions of some electrolytes (now called strong), this factor approaches small integers. Thus, for a dilute sodium chloride solution with concentration c, an osmotic pressure of 2RTc was always measured, which could readily be explained by the fact that the solution, in fact, actually contains twice the number of species corresponding to concentration c calculated in the usual manner from the weighed amount of substance dissolved in the solution. Small deviations from integral numbers were attributed to experimental errors (they are now attributed to the effect of the activity coefficient). 

The fact that the water molecules forming the hydration sheath have limited mobility, i.e. that the solution is to certain degree ordered, results in lower values of the ionic entropies. In special cases, the ionic entropy can be measured (e.g. from the dependence of the standard potential on the temperature for electrodes of the second kind). Otherwise, the heat of solution is the measurable quantity. Knowledge of the lattice energy then permits calculation of the heat of hydration. For a saturated solution, the heat of solution is equal to the product of the temperature and the entropy of solution, from which the entropy of the salt in the solution can be found. However, the absolute value of the entropy of the crystal must be obtained from the dependence of its thermal capacity on the temperature down to very low temperatures. The value of the entropy of the salt can then yield the overall hydration number. It is, however, difficult to separate the contributions of the cation and of the anion. 

We must report the results of our calculations to the proper number of significant digits. We almost always use our measurements to calculate other quantities and the results of the calculations must indicate to the reader the limit of accuracy with which the actual measurements were made. The rules for significant digits as the result of additions or subtractions with measured quantities are as follows ... 

Procedure (NOTE - Allow the chromatograph to run for at least 16-18 min between injections to allow for elution of all components associated with the injection vehicle.) Separately inject equal volumes (about 20 pL) of the Standard preparation and the Assay preparation into the chromatograph, record the chromatograms, and measure the responses for the major peaks. Calculate the quantity, in mg, of Ci8H14CL4N20 in each milliliter of the injection given by the formula ... 

---