Burner methanol

Caution Addition of 0 5 cm pieces of sodium metal to methanol or ethanol must be done in a chemical hood and behind a safety shield. Addition should be slow to minimize evaporation loss of methanol or ethanol. No flames or burner should be permitted in the area. Disposal of sodium metal must be earned out in someone s presence. 

The progress of the reaction can be monitored by TLC by working up a sample of the reaction mixture filter through Celite, cool to 0°C, and acidify to pH 1 with 10% aqueous HCI. The solid that precipitates is isolated by filtration and dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) for TLC analysis on Merck precoated-silica gel 60 plates with methyl ethyl ketone-methanol-water (4 1 1) as eluent, developed by dipping in 5% sulfuric acid-ethanol and heated to 450°C (e.g., with a Bunsen burner). Rf values are 0.25 for fl-cyclodextrin, 0.5 for monotosylate and 0.65 for a second product, probably ditosylate. 

For reformate flow rates up to 400 Ndm3 min-1, the CO output was determined as < 12 ppm for simulated methanol. The reactors were operated at full load (20 kW equivalent power output) for -100 h without deactivation. In connection with the 20 kW methanol reformer, the CO output of the two final reactors was < 10 ppm for more than 2 h at a feed concentration of 1.6% carbon monoxide. Because the reformer was realized as a combination of steam reformer and catalytic burner in the plate and fin design as well, this may be regarded as an impressive demonstration of the capabilities of the integrated heat exchanger design for fuel processors in the kilowatt range. 

Start-up was effected by feeding methanol directly to the burner. The integrated reformer/burner reactor and the integrated PrOx reactor/cooler fabricated at IMM are shown in Figure 2.74. Characterization of the single devices and their assembly is still pending. 

Results presented were determined at a partial load of the device (1-2 kW for the LHV of the hydrogen produced). At a burner off-gas (heating gas) inlet temperature of 350 °C, a S/C ratio of 1.5 and a pressure of 3 bar, full conversion of the methanol was achieved and 0.9 m3 h 1 hydrogen were produced. The hydrogen production rate was regarded as competitive with literature data. 

The ATR (Autothermal Reforming) process makes CO-enriched syngas. It combines partial oxidation with adiabatic steam-reforming and is a cost-effective option when oxygen or enriched air is available. It was developed in the late 1950 s for ammonia and methanol synthesis, and then further developed in the 1990 s by Haldor Topspe2. The difference between Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) and ATR is in how heat is provided to activate the endothermic steam reforming reaction. In SMR, the catalyst is contained in tubes that are heated by an external burner. 

To prepare copper-II-oxide, all you need to do is place the dried mass of hydrated copper hydroxides (prepared in step 1) into a crucible and then heat at 600 to 800 Celsius using a typical Bunsen burner for about 3 to 4 hours. During the heating process, water is volatized and removed, and the copper hydroxides are oxidized to copper-II-oxide forming a black powder. After the roasting process, the copper-II-oxide is cooled, and then stored in any suitable container. This copper-II-oxide can be used in pyrotechnic compositions, or used as a catalyst for the oxidation of various gases, such as the oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde. 

With regard to the following theoretical analysis that had to be carried out in order to allow a sound interpretation of the results, experiments varying only the inlet temperature and the fuel content seemed to be most suitable and easy to perform. As a consequence, an extinction line was recorded. All experiments were performed in a burner with a configuration according to fig. 1 and with methanol as fuel. 

Methanol CH.OH wood alcohol (for use as fuel in alcohol burner) chemical supply house... 

Some other important aspects of boric acid chemistry are summarized in Fig. 5-26. Among these is the formation of borate esters [B(OR)3, R = alkyl or aryl], usually obtained as colorless liquids, on treatment with alcohols and H2S04. The vast literature on these compounds falls generally within the purview of organic chemistry, and will not be developed here however, it will be noted that a well-known qualitative test for boron involves treatment of the sample with methanol to form B(OMe)3, which produces a bright green color in a Bunsen burner flame. A major early discovery in this area was the synthesis of boronic acids by E. Frankland in 1862, via partial oxidation of trialkylboranes, with subsequent hydrolysis of the ester ... 

A diethyl ether cool flame, followed by a second-stage flame can be stabilized in a tube [74] or above a burner [75—77], and Agnew and Agnew [78] have used a quartz probe to remove samples from various positions in these flames. Numerous products were identified including not only carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, water, various saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methanol, ethanol and acetic acid, but also ethyl formate, ethyl acetate, acetone, propionaldehyde and 2-methyl-l 3-dioxacyclopentane. The main features of the analytical results were... 

The flame decompositions of 2-hydroxyethyl nitrate, 2-methoxyethyl nitrate and 2-ethoxyethyl nitrate have been studied using a flat flame burner [135]. The major products of very rapid reaction in the flame front are nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, water, formaldehyde, methyl formate, methanol and a large amount of unidentified material. The absence of 2-methoxyethanol and of nitrogen dioxide, and presence of only minor amounts of dimethyl ether is of some importance. 

The modification of the standard procedure involves the use of a disposable sample boat. A piece of copper foil approximately 1 X i in. in size is shaped manually into boat form. It is flamed in a Bunsen burner and dipped into methanol. After this cleaning operation, the boat is placed in a glass tube and heated briefly with a Bunsen flame while being swept with a stream of hydrogen (caution ) it is then ready for use in the procedure described by Oliver. Some typical results are given in Table I. Anal. Calcd. for CarHaoClOPzRh O, 2.32. Found 0, 2.30, 2.34. By checkers Calcd C, 64.32 H, 4.38 mol. wt., 691. Found C, 64.49 H, 4.61 mol. wt., 688 4. Calcd. for Cj7H3oC10As2Rh O, 2.05. Found O, 1.95, 2.10. By checkers Calcd C, 57.06 H, 3.88 , mol. wt., 778. Found C, 57.65 H, 4.43 mol. wt., 790 13. 

Place a 3-mm cube of sodium (30 mg, nomore) inalO x 75 mmPyrex test tube and support the tube in a vertical position (Fig. 1). Have a microburner with small flame ready to move under the tube, place an estimated 20 mg of solid on a spatula or knife blade, put the burner in place, and heat until the sodium first melts and then vapor rises 1.5-2.0 cm in the tube. Remove the burner and at once drop the sample onto the hot sodium. If the substance is a liquid add 2 drops of it. If there is a flash or small explosion the fusion is complete if not, heat briefly to produce a flash or a charring. Then let the tube cool to room temperature, be sure it is cold, add a drop of methanol, and let it react. Repeat until 10 drops have been added. 

The test oils were relatively easy to bum and emission values were fairly good. The combustability was significantly improved by methanol addition. After adjusting the burner, no greater problems appeared and the boiler remained clean. Neither did the nozzle clog easily. 

As regards emission values, a general conclusion is that the nitrogen oxide level was rather high for the test oils, vdiile foe particles emissions were small. The NO, level increased due to the reduction of water content and foe heat of initial flame due to rapid combustion of added methanol. Also foe burner had to be adjusted so that the flame was suitable, stable and the level of particle emissions reasonable. On the other hand, this contributed to oil vaporisation and particles gasification and hence to small particles emission. 

A general conclusion is that the results were relatively clear and the main issues were retrieved well. There were clear differences in combustibility and in particular in emissions for different oil grades. The most important parametres of pyrolysis oil are viscosity, water and particles content, methanol addition, oil raw material, and oil age. Good and poor oils or at least difficult oils were distinguished in combustion. The burner and boiler modifications in rovc the combustion result but cannot help much if the oil quality is poor. 

---