Austenite determination

Determining Residual Austenite with the Eddy Current Method. 

The determining of sorting limits of steel parts after thermal processing in order to eliminate these, which indicate exceeded allowed content of residual austenite, requires elements of identical shape and dimensions, as the studied parts, and with known content of residual austenite. Such elements serve to define the sorting thresold, during manual control as well as automatic... 

The percentage share of the inserts made austenite steel in the martensite structure is refered to the visual field of the probe in the given location. Every probe after performance is given a characteristics, in which the visual field is given, determined using special devices defining the visual field at different distances from the tested object. 

Lampe J. Preparing surfaces for radiological determining of residual austenite MOC IMP No 47,1980. 

If the gas has the correct composition, the carbon content at the surface increases to the saturation value, ie, the solubiUty limit of carbon in austenite (Fig. 2), which is a function of temperature. Continued addition of carbon to the surface increases the carbon content curve. The surface content is maintained at this saturation value (9) (Fig. 5). The gas carburizing process is controlled by three factors (/) the thermodynamics of the gas reactions which determine the equiUbrium carbon content at the surface (2) the kinetics of the chemical reactions which deposit the carbon and (J) the diffusion of carbon into the austenite. 

Many commercial gases are generated by burning hydrocarbons (qv) eg, natural gas or propanes, in air (see Gas, natural Liquified petroleum gas). The combustion process, especially the amount of air used, determines the gas composition. For a given fuel-to-air ratio, the gas composition can be used to determine the water vapor content required to achieve a desired equiUbrium carbon content of the austenite (see Combustiontechnology). 

Since the rate of formation of cementite is determined by nucleation, and therefore proceeds more rapidly in fine-grained steels, it follows that the T-T-T diagram will show a more rapid onset of austenite decomposition than in steels of the same composition, but a coarser grain size. The shape of the T-T-T curve is also a function of the steel composition, and is altered by the presence of alloying elements at a low concenuation. This is because the common alloying elements such as manganese, nickel and clrromium decrease... 

The shape of a vessel determines how well it drains (Figure 53.7). If the outlet is not at the very lowest point process liquid may be left inside. This will concentrate by evaporation unless cleaned out, and it will probably become more corrosive. This also applies to horizontal pipe runs and steam or cooling coils attached to vessels. Steam heating coils that do not drain adequately collect condensate. This is very often contaminated by chloride ions, which are soon concentrated to high enough levels (10-100 ppm) to pose serious pitting and stress corrosion cracking risks for 300-series austenitic stainless steel vessels and steam coils. 

Suzuki, Yamake and Kitamura determined the pHs, chloride ion concentrations, metal ion concentrations and the potentials of artificial pits in Fe, Cr, Ni and Mo, and in three austenitic stainless steels during anodic polarisation in 0-5 N NaCl at 70°C. In the case of the pure metals the pH values were found to be lower than those calculated from the metal ion concentrations (Table 1.17), and the experimentally determined pHs were as follows ... 

Fig. 3.11 Structure of steels after cooling from elevated temperature as determined by composition. A austenite, M martensite and F 6-ferrite (after Schaeffler)...

Potential-current density (E-i) curves, which have been determined for a number of the austenitic cast irons and also for the nickel-free ferritic irons, indicate that in general the austenitic cast irons show more favourable corrosion characteristics than the ferritic irons in both the active and passive states. 

Similar curves determined in 50 Vo sodium hydroxide solution at 60°C show (Fig. 3.46) that the austenitic irons exhibit more noble active dissolution and also lower current densities in the active and passive regions than the ferritic irons the current densities in both regions decrease markedly with increasing nickel content (Fig. 3.47). 

In 3% sodium chloride solution at 60°C the austenitic irons again show superior characteristics to the ferritic. The breakdown potentials determined in this environment, which provide a relative measure of the resistance to attack in neutral chloride solutions, are generally more noble for the austenitic irons than for the ferritic (Table 3.47). This indicates that the austenitic irons should show better corrosion resistance in such environments. 

Test methods for determining electrolytic corrosion with electrical insulating materials Method for determination of resistance to intergranular corrosion of austenitic stainless steels copper sulphate-sulphuric acid method (Moneypenny Strauss test) Specification for electroplated coatings of tin/lead alloys... 

Austenitic stainless steels-determination of resistance to intergranular corrosion. Part 1 Corrosion test in nitric acid medium by measurement of loss of mass (Huey test) Austenitic stainless steels-determination of resistance to intergranular corrosion. Part 2 Corrosion test in a sulphuric acid/copper sulphate medium in the presence of copper turnings (Moneypenny Strauss test)... 

With small modifications, ASTM standard G48 can be used to determine a CPT. The test is used as a ranking parameter for the resistance to pitting of high-alloyed austenitic stainless steels. In this method, material coupons are typically exposed for 24 or 72 h to a 6% FeCl3 (=1.11 mole/liter) solution at fixed temperatures (typically with 2.5°C intervals). The CPT is defined as the lowest temperature at which the specimen is attacked by pitting corrosion. 

Materials of Construction and Operational Stress. Before a centrifugal separation device is chosen, the corrosive characteristics of the liquid and solids as well as the cleaning and sanitizing solutions must be determined. A wide variety of materials may be used. Most centrifuges are austenitic stainless steels however, many are made of ordinary steel, mbber or plastic coated steel, Monel, Hastelloy, titanium, duplex stainless steel, and others. The solvents present and of course the temperature environment must be considered in elastomers and plastics, including composites. 

---