Atom-type methods

The best results have been obtained by embedded-atom-type methods, applied first with good success to many metallurgical properties of pure metals surface energy, point-defect properties (see for example Foiles et al., 1986 Chapter 4 by Voter in this volume). In these methods, the energy of each atom is computed from the energy F,(p,) needed to embed it in the local-electron density pi provided by the other atoms of the alloy (approximated by the superposition of atomic-electron densities Pj=Hj, /Pj(Ry)), plus an additional electrostatic short-range core-core repulsion y Rij) = Zj(Rf)Zj(Rjj)/Rjj. The total energy is then written as... 

While simulations reach into larger time spans, the inaccuracies of force fields become more apparent on the one hand properties based on free energies, which were never used for parametrization, are computed more accurately and discrepancies show up on the other hand longer simulations, particularly of proteins, show more subtle discrepancies that only appear after nanoseconds. Thus force fields are under constant revision as far as their parameters are concerned, and this process will continue. Unfortunately the form of the potentials is hardly considered and the refinement leads to an increasing number of distinct atom types with a proliferating number of parameters and a severe detoriation of transferability. The increased use of quantum mechanics to derive potentials will not really improve this situation ab initio quantum mechanics is not reliable enough on the level of kT, and on-the-fly use of quantum methods to derive forces, as in the Car-Parrinello method, is not likely to be applicable to very large systems in the foreseeable future. 

The most well-known and at the same time the earliest computer model for a molecular structure representation is a wire frame model (Figure 2-123a). This model is also known under other names such as line model or Drciding model [199]. It shows the individual bonds and the angles formed between these bonds. The bonds of a molecule are represented by colored vector lines and the color is derived from the atom type definition. This simple method does not display atoms, but atom positions can be derived from the end and branching points of the wire frame model. In addition, the bond orders between two atoms can be expressed by the number of lines. 

A m oleciilar ni echaiiics meih od in HyperChem isdefined by a set of atom types and a functional form for the energy and its derivatives for example. AMHKR. For the. AMBKR method, you may use many different default and iiser-defmed parameter sets. Hyper-... 

HyperChem quantum mechanical calculations are ab initio and semi-empirical. Ab initio calculations use parameters (contracted basis functions) associated with shells, such as an s shell, sp shell, etc., or atomic numbers (atoms). Semi-empirical calculations use parameters associated with specific atomic numbers. The concept of atom types is not used in the conventional quantum mechanics methods. Semi-empirical quantum mechanics methods use a rigorous quantum mechanical formulation combined with the use of empirical parameters obtained from comparison with experiment. If parameters are available for the atoms of a given molecule, the ab initio and semi-empirical calculations have an a priori aspect when compared with a molecular mechanics calculation, letting... 

Atomic emission is used for the analysis of the same types of samples that may be analyzed by atomic absorption. The development of a quantitative atomic emission method requires several considerations, including choosing a source for atomization and excitation, selecting a wavelength and slit width, preparing the sample for analysis, minimizing spectral and chemical interferences, and selecting a method of standardization. 

Finally, the parametrization of the van der Waals part of the QM-MM interaction must be considered. This applies to all QM-MM implementations irrespective of the quantum method being employed. From Eq. (9) it can be seen that each quantum atom needs to have two Lennard-Jones parameters associated with it in order to have a van der Walls interaction with classical atoms. Generally, there are two approaches to this problem. The first is to derive a set of parameters, e, and G, for each common atom type and then to use this standard set for any study that requires a QM-MM study. This is the most common aproach, and the derived Lennard-Jones parameters for the quantum atoms are simply the parameters found in the MM force field for the analogous atom types. For example, a study that employed a QM-MM method implemented in the program CHARMM [48] would use the appropriate Lennard-Jones parameters of the CHARMM force field [52] for the atoms in the quantum region. 

The van der Waals distance, Rq, and softness parameters, depend on both atom types. These parameters are in all force fields written in terms of parameters for the individual atom types. There are several ways of combining atomic parameters to diatomic parameters, some of them being quite complicated. A commonly used method is to take the van der Waals minimum distance as the sum of two van der Waals radii, and the interaction parameter as the geometrical mean of atomic softness constants. 

Atoms are assigned types , much as in force field methods, i.e. the parameters depend on the nuclear charge and the bonding situation. The a a and /3ab parameters for atom types A and B are related to the corresponding parameters for sp -hybridized carbon by means of dimensionless constants /ia and /cab-... 

Atom-based methods [40, 57-68] cut molecules down to single atoms and commonly do not apply correction rules. According to Eq. (9) they work by summing the products of the contribution of an atom type i times the frequency of its presence in a query molecule ... 

Table 8.53 shows the main features of XAS. The advantages of EXAFS over diffraction methods are that the technique does not depend on long-range order, hence it can always be used to study local environments in amorphous (and crystalline) solids and liquids it is atom specific and can be sensitive to low concentrations of the target atom (about 100 ppm). XAS provides information on interatomic distances, coordination numbers, atom types and structural disorder and oxidation state by inference. Accuracy is 1-2% for interatomic distances, and 10-25 % for coordination numbers. 

To make an accurate FEP calculation, a good description of the system is required. This means that the parameters for the chosen force field must reproduce the dynamic behaviour of both species correctly. A realistic description of the environment, e.g. size of water box, and the treatment of the solute-solvent interaction energy is also required. The majority of the parameters can usually be taken from the standard atom types of a force field. The electrostatic description of the species at both ends of the perturbation is, however, the key to a good simulation of many systems. This is also the part that usually requires tailoring to the system of interest. Most force fields require atom centered charges obtained by fitting to the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), usually over the van der Waals surface. Most authors in the studies discussed above used RHF/6-31G or higher methods to obtain the MEP. 

Flame emission spectrometry is used extensively for the determination of trace metals in solution and in particular the alkali and alkaline earth metals. The most notable applications are the determinations of Na, K, Ca and Mg in body fluids and other biological samples for clinical diagnosis. Simple filter instruments generally provide adequate resolution for this type of analysis. The same elements, together with B, Fe, Cu and Mn, are important constituents of soils and fertilizers and the technique is therefore also useful for the analysis of agricultural materials. Although many other trace metals can be determined in a variety of matrices, there has been a preference for the use of atomic absorption spectrometry because variations in flame temperature are much less critical and spectral interference is negligible. Detection limits for flame emission techniques are comparable to those for atomic absorption, i.e. from < 0.01 to 10 ppm (Table 8.6). Flame emission spectrometry complements atomic absorption spectrometry because it operates most effectively for elements which are easily ionized, whilst atomic absorption methods demand a minimum of ionization (Table 8.7). 

In general, atomic absorption methods are subject to three types of interferences, namely ... 

---