Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Assays sample control

The Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by (8) and (9), were also investigated for Na assay in control serum and urine [22]. The found values for the Na concentrations in both of the serum and urine samples are in good agreement with their corresponding actual values with a relative standard deviation of about 1%. These results suggest that the Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by calix[4]arene neutral carrier (8) are reliable on assay in human body fluid. [Pg.606]

System suitability errors often include profiles that are not consistent with historical data such as (1) excessive peak tailing, poor resolution of critical components or noisy baseline (2) peak spikes due to micro bubbles or electric shock and (3) integration parameters such as percent main peak area out of range for the assay reference control sample. [Pg.392]

In PCR product, the untreated sample can be considered as a strand-specific intra-assay negative control. Electrochemical signals upon thermal denaturation undoubtedly designated the presence of a complementary sequence. Genosensors showed a different behaviour as underlined by the signal ratio between the denaturated and non-denaturated sample that highlighted the dissimilar efficiency of each probe. [Pg.1245]

Enzyme samples were added to test tubes and heated at a controlled temperature before conducting a standard activity assay. Samples were incubated either in boiling water for 15 min, or in a constant-temperature bath at 65, 85, or 105°C for 15 min. Samples were then cooled to room temperature and tested for activity at 65°C using the standard assay outlined above. To determine whether the substrate offered protection against thermoinactivation, another set of trials was conducted in which 0.5 g of corn was added to the enzyme during the preincubation period. The enzyme was then cooled and assayed for activity at 65°C, as outlined above. In these experiments, samples were incubated in a silicone oil bath at either 85,105, or 125°C. [Pg.253]

In Note 8 of the ICH Guidance Toxicokinetics 1994 it is stated It is often considered unnecessary to assay samples from control groups. Samples may be collected and then assayed if it is deemed that this may help in the interpretation of the toxicity findings, or in the valida-... [Pg.599]

Inclusion of a positive control (i.e., ATase expressing cell line or tissue) in both extraction and assay procedures is strongly advised particularly when assaying samples with very low or unknown ATase activity. [Pg.176]

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Both competitive and sandwich ELlSAs are available. Although the competitive ELISA is faster because it uses only one incubation with an antibody, it is reported to be less sensitive and exhibits large imprecision. ELISA can be performed on a microplate reader, allowing semiautomation. In the sandwich assay, the primary antibody (antialbumin antiserum) is fixed on the plastic plate, which is then washed. Samples, controls, and calibrators are added, and the complexes detected and quantified by a second antibody conjugated to an enzyme label. [Pg.888]

MATERIALS AND METHODS Assay Reagents, Controls, and Samples... [Pg.480]

IgG Assay. Samples and controls to be assayed for IgG were collected in 5 ml quantities. From these samples, 750 microliters were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1250 RPM. The supernant fluid was collected, and 250 microliters were injected into a Beckman ICS Analyzer II. [Pg.12]

Assay Reagents, Controls, and Samples in the PRISM HCV core Ag Assay. Solid-phase. Microparticles coated with MAb cl 1-7 or cl 1-14 anti-HCV core IgG. Specimen Diluent Buffer (SDB) SDB contained surfactants, blockers, and buffer salts to enhance specific binding and minimize nonspecific binding. [Pg.182]

On receipt of kits, operators should have everything to be able to perform the assay. The control sera enable operators to monitor the assay routinely, and the use of these data in control charts is the basis of this chapter. The necessary data for plotting on various charts is obtained through the calculation of the mean and standard deviation iSD), from the mean of control samples as raw OD... [Pg.349]

It is recommended to include internal quality controls with each batch of samples to enable an internal check of the reliability of each assay. These controls contain known drugs at known concentrations. Suitable acceptance criteria are required for these controls before results of unknown cases can be accepted and released to a client. Acceptance criteria vary depending on the analyte and application. For example, blood alcohol estimations have acceptance criteria less than 5% while postmortem blood procedures may be 10 to 20%. [Pg.295]

Degradable PE samples were sterilised by UV exposure at 254 nm (2x5 min) and inoculated over 30 minutes with a suspension of different strains (bacterium and fimgus). Assays and controls were incubated for six months at 27 °C and 85 % humidity in an environmental cabinet. Cultivations were carried out in Petri dishes containing glass beads and a mineral salt medium [56]. It was observed that the heated films oxidised more rapidly than the control at the end of the induction period. [Pg.72]

The plaque assay is desirable because it is very sensitive and only detects infectious viral particles. However, there are viral agents which cannot be supported by cell lines. In these cases other methods must be used. The polymerase chain reaction (PGR), which amplifies DNA or RNA from viral agents, can be used to detect the presence and quantity of viral agents. The amount of RNA or DNA target in the initial sample can be determined by competitive PGR where the quantity of amplified product is compared to a control PGR product where the initial amount of target is known. Quantification is also possible by an end-point dilution method similar to that used to determine a tissue culture infections dose. PGR methods can be very sensitive however. [Pg.143]

In fact, most RIAs and many nonisotopic immunoassays use a competitive binding format (see Fig. 2). In this approach, the analyte in the sample to be measured competes with a known amount of added analyte that has been labeled with an indicator that binds to the immobilized antibody. After reaction, the free analyte—analyte-indicator solution is washed away from the soHd phase. The analyte-indicator on the soHd phase or remaining in the wash solution is then used to quantify the amount of analyte present in the sample as measured against a control assay using only an analyte-indicator. This is done by quantifying the analyte-indicator using the method appropriate for the assay, for example, enzyme activity, fluorescence, radioactivity, etc. [Pg.22]

Enzyme Assays. An enzyme assay determines the amount of enzyme present in sample. However, enzymes are usually not measured on a stoichiometric basis. Enzyme activity is usually determined from a rate assay and expressed in activity units. As mentioned above, a change in temperature, pH, and/or substrate concentration affects the reaction velocity. These parameters must therefore be carefully controlled in order to achieve reproducible results. [Pg.288]

The advantages of controlled-potential techniques include high sensitivity, selectivity towards electroactive species, a wide linear range, portable and low-cost instrumentation, speciation capability, and a wide range of electrodes that allow assays of unusual environments. Several properties of these techniques are summarized in Table 1-1. Extremely low (nanomolar) detection limits can be achieved with very small sample volumes (5-20 pi), thus allowing the determination of analyte amounts of 10 13 to 10 15 mol on a routine basis. Improved selectivity may be achieved via the coupling of controlled-potential schemes with chromatographic or optical procedures. [Pg.3]

In cases where the mode of action is the strong or irreversible inhibition of an enzyme system, the assay may measure the extent of inhibition of this enzyme. This may be accomplished by first measuring the activity of the inhibited enzyme and then making comparison with the uninhibited enzyme. This practice is followed when studying acetylcholinesterase inhibition by organophosphates (OP). Acetylcholinesterase activity is measured in a sample of tissue of brain from an animal that has been exposed to an OP. Activity is measured in the same way in tissue samples from untreated controls of the same species, sex, age, etc. Comparison is then made between the two activity measurements, and the percentage inhibition is estimated. [Pg.300]


See other pages where Assays sample control is mentioned: [Pg.429]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.2688]    [Pg.1257]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.1479]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 ]




SEARCH



Control sample

Sampling controller

© 2024 chempedia.info