Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Assays sandwich

Enzyme Immunosensors. Enzyme immunosensors are enzyme immunoassays coupled with electrochemical sensors. These sensors (qv) require multiple steps for analyte determination, and either sandwich assays or competitive binding assays maybe used. Both of these assays use antibodies for the analyte of interest attached to a membrane on the surface of an electrochemical sensor. In the sandwich assay type, the membrane-bound antibody binds the sample antigen, which in turn binds another antibody that is enzyme-labeled. This immunosensor is then placed in a solution containing the substrate for the labeling enzyme and the rate of product formation is measured electrochemically. The rate of the reaction is proportional to the amount of bound enzyme and thus to the amount of the analyte antigen. The sandwich assay can be used only with antigens capable of binding two different antibodies simultaneously (53). [Pg.103]

Fig. 13. General protocol for heterogeneous enzyme immunoassay preparation of reagent cuvettes by coating Ab, competitive assay format, and sandwich assay format. (Reprinted with permission from W. R. Heineman and H. B. Halsall, Anal. Chem, 1985, 57, 1321A. Copyright 1985, American Chemical Society)... Fig. 13. General protocol for heterogeneous enzyme immunoassay preparation of reagent cuvettes by coating Ab, competitive assay format, and sandwich assay format. (Reprinted with permission from W. R. Heineman and H. B. Halsall, Anal. Chem, 1985, 57, 1321A. Copyright 1985, American Chemical Society)...
Very recently, a sandwich assay for prostatic acid phosphatase antigen was carried out using two cascaded enzyme reactions to provide amplification of the immunochemical event. In one format, an optical readout was used whereby a forma-zan dye was generated by reaction of a dye precursor and NADH generated from the second enzyme cycle. In the electrochemical format, the NADH generated in the second enzyme cycle was used to reduce Fe(CN) to FeCCN) " which was then detected amperometrically. While the use of Fe(CN) in ECIA has appeared in the... [Pg.70]

Direct detection is usually preferred in applications, where direct binding of analyte of concentrations of interest produces a sufficient response. If necessary, the lowest detection limits of the direct biosensors can be improved by using a sandwich assay. Smaller analytes (molecular weight < 10,000) are usually measured using inhibition assay, Figure 14. [Pg.189]

Figure 14. Detection formats used in affinity biosensors based on spectroscopy of guided waves a) direct detection, b) sandwich assay, and c) competitive inhibition assay. Figure 14. Detection formats used in affinity biosensors based on spectroscopy of guided waves a) direct detection, b) sandwich assay, and c) competitive inhibition assay.
The most common use of protein microarrays is in immunoassays. In particular, antibody-based immunoassays are the main stream of diagnostic assays due to their specificity. The assay usually runs in a multiplexed mode where the antibodies or other capture agents are immobilized and then exposed to a biological sample. There are four immunoassay formats direct binding, sandwich (ELISA), competitive, and displacement. Direct-binding and sandwich assays are the most common. There are some reports on the use of competitive assays and displacement assays, which are usually associated with high surface area/volume systems [72-76],... [Pg.368]

Fig. II.8 Assays for 10 ng/mL PSA on IL Class BioCDs. (a) Forward label free assay at 10 ng/mL showing the histrogram of approximately 10,000 spots pairs, (b) Sandwich assay shows clear separation... Fig. II.8 Assays for 10 ng/mL PSA on IL Class BioCDs. (a) Forward label free assay at 10 ng/mL showing the histrogram of approximately 10,000 spots pairs, (b) Sandwich assay shows clear separation...
However, luminescence-based detection techniques often require a high number of steps. Consider ELISA as an example. As a first step, the sample is introduced into a 96-well plate an antibody targeting the antigen of interest has been immobilized to the wells of the plate. After a rinse, the wells contain the antibody and any bound antigen. However, although the antigen has been isolated, the protocol is nowhere near completion. The remaining steps include another antibody (different from the first) to form a sandwich assay, a secondary antibody with an enzymatic label, and a substrate that is luminescent when activated by the enzyme. Finally, the sample is analyzed by relatively expensive detection optics to determine the amount of analyte that was captured in the assay. The steps are illustrated in Fig. 14.1a. [Pg.378]

Fig. 30 Representative scheme for the signal amplification concept by increasing the number of fluorophores per binding site in an antigen-antibody sandwich assay, (a) Binding of a labeled antibody to the target analyte yields a moderate fluorescence signal because the antibody is labeled with only few fluorophores (b) For the same binding event, the emission signal is dramatically amplified when using an antibody labeled with a nanoparticle that is doped with a large number of fluorophores... Fig. 30 Representative scheme for the signal amplification concept by increasing the number of fluorophores per binding site in an antigen-antibody sandwich assay, (a) Binding of a labeled antibody to the target analyte yields a moderate fluorescence signal because the antibody is labeled with only few fluorophores (b) For the same binding event, the emission signal is dramatically amplified when using an antibody labeled with a nanoparticle that is doped with a large number of fluorophores...
A competitive ELISA assay for Lp(a) was recently described (Y4) in which the microtiter plate was coated with Lp(a) purified from a pool of donors. The method is simple and easy to perform, with satisfactory analytical parameters. A good stability and a reproducible coating of plates with the large Lp(a) lipoprotein is, however, critical in this type of assay. Wang et al. (W6) described an indirect sandwich assay for the measurement of Lp(a) in plasma and in dried blood spots, which can be applied to screening elevated Lp(a) levels in newborns (V3, V4). [Pg.108]

Phase-separation immunoassays have been reported, in which the solid phase particles are formed after the immunoreaction is completed.(42) Phase-separation immunoassays are advantageous since the unstirred layer of solution near a solid surface alters diffusion and binding kinetics at the surface in comparison with the properties of the bulk solution. In phase-separation assays for IgG and IgM, capture antibodies are bound with monomers suitable for styrene or acrylamide polymerization.(42) Monomer-labeled capture antibodies are reacted with analyte and with fluorescein- and/or phycoerythrin-labeled antibodies in a sandwich assay, followed by polymerization of the monomers. Fluorescence of the resulting particles is quantitated in a FACS IV flow microfluorometer, and is directly proportional to analyte concentration. [Pg.461]

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is based on the specific reaction between an antibody and an antigen. One of the reagents in the reaction is labeled with an enzyme that generates a colorimetric product that can be measured with a spectrophotometric device. The color intensity correlates with the concentration of specific antibody and the respective antigen. The reaction can be formatted in various ways in a multiwell plate (microtiter plate) with the common formats being the sandwich assay, the competitive assay, and the direct assay. (See Figure 11.1.)... [Pg.279]

The sandwich assay is the format used most often to quantitate a target antigen or analyte. In the sandwich assay, two antibodies are used that bind to different parts of the antigen. One of the antibodies is bound to, or coated on, the solid surface (mictotiter plate wells), whereas the other has a label attached to it (Figure 11.1a). Alternatively, a secondary conjugated antibody can be used to detect the bound primary antibody (Figure 11.1b). If the antigen is present in the sample solution, it links the two antibodies. Therefore, the label is retained on the plate where it can be detected by use of a colorimetric substrate. [Pg.279]

Figure 11.1 (a) Sandwich assay analyte is captured between an antibody coated on the microplate well and... [Pg.280]

The most commonly used format for quantitation assays is the sandwich assay format. Typically, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) is used to capture the product. It is then detected by another antibody, usually enzyme-labeled. A reference standard is used from which to compare the response of an unknown test sample. There is a relative increase in measured response (optical density) with increasing analyte concentration. Figure 11.2 is an example of a typical ELISA standard curve. [Pg.282]

Noncompetitive ELISA methods are based on sandwich assays in which an excess supply of immobilized primary antibody, the capture antibody, quantitatively binds the antigen of interest and an enzyme-labeled secondary antibody is then allowed to react with the bound antigen forming a sandwich. A color reaction product produced by the enzyme is then used to measure the enzyme activity that is bound to the surface of the microtiter plate. Sandwich ELISA (noncompetitive) methods yield calibration curves in which enzyme activity increases with increasing free antigen concentration. [Pg.214]

SPR affinity biosensors have been developed to detect an analyte in a variety of formats. The choice of detection format for a particular application depends on the size of target analyte molecules, binding characteristics of available biomolecular recognition element, and range of concentrations of analyte to be measured. The main detection formats used in SPR biosensors include direct detection (Fig. 11), sandwich assay (Fig. 12) and inhibition assay (Fig. 13). [Pg.112]

Figure 12. Detection formats used in SPR affinity biosensors sandwich assay. Figure 12. Detection formats used in SPR affinity biosensors sandwich assay.
Molecular weight of the main bacterial toxins ranges from 28,000 to 150,000, which makes it possible for most sensitive SPR biosensors to measure their concentrations directly or using a sandwich assay. Examples of food safety-related toxins detected by SPR biosensors include Botulinum toxin (detection limit 2.5 pg/ml " ), . coli enterotoxin (detection limit 6 pg/ml " ) and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (detection limit 5 ng/ml and 0.5 ng/ml for direct detection and sandwich assay, respectively" ). [Pg.114]

Bacterial pathogens are relatively large targets (> 1pm) and therefore, their presence can be detected directly with an optional amplification by secondary antibodies (sandwich assay). Examples of foodbome bacterial pathogens detected by SPR biosensors include Escherichia coli (detection limit 5x10 cfii/ml " " ), Listeria monocytogenes (detection limit 1 O cfii/ml " ) and Salmonella enteritidis (detection limit lO cfii/ml" ). [Pg.115]

Sandwich assay — This format works well for ELISA. The success and potential shortcomings for microarrays are discussed in the next section. [Pg.20]

Pierce introduced an array-of-arrays microplate product called Search-Light in which antibodies are directly printed into the wells of the microplate. Also, we have reviewed MSD s Multi-Spot plate products having antibodies immobilized onto multiple working electrodes. These products (albeit with some novel approaches to create microarrays and means for detection) utilize the classic immunosorbent sandwich assay but have the advantage of parallel processing using microarrays. [Pg.51]


See other pages where Assays sandwich is mentioned: [Pg.28]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.216]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.556 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 , Pg.340 , Pg.341 , Pg.342 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.136 , Pg.137 , Pg.138 , Pg.139 , Pg.140 , Pg.151 , Pg.171 , Pg.189 , Pg.190 , Pg.219 , Pg.237 , Pg.238 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.185 , Pg.232 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 , Pg.120 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.416 , Pg.419 , Pg.420 , Pg.423 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 ]




SEARCH



Antibody sandwich ELISA assays

Assay formats sandwich assays

Detectability sandwich assays

Electrochemical Aptasensors Based on a Sandwich Assay

Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay sandwich

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sandwich

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sandwich ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sandwich method

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sandwich technique

Immunoassay sandwich assays

Paramagnetic beads sandwich assays

Sandwich assay development

Sandwich assay electrochemical aptasensors

Sandwich assay, cytokines

Sandwich assays details

Sandwich assays detection

Sandwich assays principles

Sandwich assays, description

Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, antigen detection

Sandwich hybridization assays

Sandwich-type assays

© 2024 chempedia.info