Aroma complexity

The powerful potentialities of SBSE followed by thermal desorption and GC-qMS methodology to characterize Madeira wine was also explored by Perestrelo et al. (2009). This methodology provided higher ability for profiling traces and ultratraces of compounds in Madeira wines, including esters (80.7-89.7%), higher alcohols (3.5-8.2%), Ci3 nor-isoprenoids (1.7-6.5%), carboxylic acids (1.6H-.2%), aldehydes (0.9-3.7%) pyrans (0.2-1.7%), lactones (0.3-2.7%), and mono (0.1-1.4%), and sesqui-terpenoids (0.1-0.8%). The authors reported that the concentration of some of them is above their odor threshold, and therefore can probably play a remarkable impact on the aroma complexity of the corresponding wines. 

More than 700 constituents have been identified in aroma extracts of roasted coffee. Heterocyclic aroma components represent the greatest amount of the steam volatile aroma complex (80 - 85 %) which amounts to 700 -900 ppm in medium roasted Arabica coffees. The concentration of individual components varies depending on coffee varieties and roasting conditions. Typical components are formed by thermal degradation of free and bound amino acid and chlorogenic acid precursors. Compared to other roasted foodstuffs, sulfur containing constituents and phenols are formed in high amounts and contribute to desirable coffee flavor or off-flavor. 

Identified by Reichstein and Staudinger (1926b), Viani et al. (1965), and by Gianturco et al. (1966) in an aroma complex from roasted coffee. Cros et al. (1980) found it in headspace of brewed Columbian coffee. Silwar et al. (1987) gave concentrations of 0.25-0.30 ppm (simultaneous distillation-extraction of steam-volatile constituents, preparative GC). In headspace after a solid-phase microextraction of a brew, it was identified by Ramos et al. (1998). 

Identified by Gianturco et al. (1966) in an aroma complex of coffee, and by Stoffelsma et al. (1968) after steam-distillation and extraction. Found also by Ho et al. (1993) in headspace of roasted coffee (0.17 ppm). 

Identified in an aroma complex of roasted coffee by Bondarovich et al. (1967) and a little later by Stoffelsma and Pypker (1968) and Stoffelsma et al. (1968), after steam distillation, fractionation and preparative GC for identification by IR spectroscopy, and comparison with authentic samples. Silwar et al. (1987) estimated its concentration at 2.0-3.0ppm (see F.19), and Ho et al. (1993) at 4.58ppm in a roasted Columbian coffee. The latter authors identified only two purely aliphatic esters in their analysis (see F.24). Ramos et al. (1998) identified it in a brewed arabica only after liquid-liquid extraction with methylene chloride (compare with F.8). 

Identified by Bondarovich et al. (1967) in an aroma complex of roasted coffee. 

Identified by Stoffelsma et at. (1968) in roasted coffee flavor. In fact, the authors did not specify the furanic structure but, as they referred to Stoll et al. (1967) for the m-isomer, there is little doubt about the identification. Friedel et al. (1971) confirmed the identification for the /ram-isomer in an aroma complex of coffee (method in Gianturco et al., 1963). Cantergiani et al. (2001) found it in a green Mexican arabica (1.56% of the volatiles by GC on a polar column). 

Identified by Friedel et al. (1971) in an aroma complex of coffee (method in Gianturco et al., 1963). The structure has been confirmed by synthesis (IR and MS data). 

Friedel P., Krampl V., Radford T., Renner J.A., Shephard F.W. and Gianturco M.A. (1971) Some constituents of the aroma complex of coffee. J. Agric. Food Chem. 19, 530-532. 

Lindner, K (1982). Using cyclodextrin aroma complexes in the catering. Nahrung, 26, 675-680. 

These relative values demonstrate the organoleptic importance of trace components of high potency in an aroma complex. The analyst frequently reaches the limit of detectability for volatile substances. The most sensitive method known today consists in the direct coupling of a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer. This method allows the analytical detection of 10 mole of a single component in a mixture (43, 544). 

The aroma of fmit, the taste of candy, and the texture of bread are examples of flavor perception. In each case, physical and chemical stmctures ia these foods stimulate receptors ia the nose and mouth. Impulses from these receptors are then processed iato perceptions of flavor by the brain. Attention, emotion, memory, cognition, and other brain functions combine with these perceptions to cause behavior, eg, a sense of pleasure, a memory, an idea, a fantasy, a purchase. These are psychological processes and as such have all the complexities of the human mind. Flavor characterization attempts to define what causes flavor and to determine if human response to flavor can be predicted. The ways ia which simple flavor active substances, flavorants, produce perceptions are described both ia terms of the physiology, ie, transduction, and psychophysics, ie, dose-response relationships, of flavor (1,2). Progress has been made ia understanding how perceptions of simple flavorants are processed iato hedonic behavior, ie, degree of liking, or concept formation, eg, crispy or umami (savory) (3,4). However, it is unclear how complex mixtures of flavorants are perceived or what behavior they cause. Flavor characterization involves the chemical measurement of iadividual flavorants and the use of sensory tests to determine their impact on behavior. 

A more complex flavor development occurs in the production of chocolate. The chocolate beans are first fermented to develop fewer complex flavor precursors upon roasting, these give the chocolate aroma. The beans from unfermented cocoa do not develop the chocolate notes (84—88) (see Chocolate and cocoa). The flavor development process with vanilla beans also allows for the formation of flavor precursors. The green vanilla beans, which have Htfle aroma or flavor, are scalded, removed, and allowed to perspire, which lowers the moisture content and retards the enzymatic activity. This process results in the formation of the vanilla aroma and flavor, and the dark-colored beans that after drying are the product of commerce. 

Another analysis handled effectively by use of gc/ir/ms is essential oil characterization which is of interest to the foods, flavors, and fragrances industries (see Oils essential). Even very minor components in these complex mixtures can affect taste and aroma. Figure 4 shows the TRC and TIC for Russian corriander oil which is used extensively in seasonings and perfumes (15). The ir and ms are serially configured. Spectra can be obtained from even the very minor gc peaks representing nanogram quantities in the it flow cell. 

Linalool has been used to prepare a mixture of terpenes useful for enhancing the aroma or taste of foodstuffs, chewing gums, and perfume compositions. Aqueous citric acid reaction at 100°C converts the linalool (3) to a complex mixture. A few of the components include a-terpineol (34%) (9), Bois de Rose oxide (5.1%) (64), ocimene quintoxide (0.5%) (65), linalool oxide (0.3%) (66), tij -ocimenol (3.28%) (67), and many other alcohols and hydrocarbons (131). 

Spontaneous fermentations are used for wine production in Erance, some other European countries and in South America. In recent years, smaller California wineries have begun experimentation with spontaneous fermentations as well. They generally start more slowly than fermentations inoculated with commercial dried yeast, are more difficult to control, and may suffer from growth of undesirable contaminants. However, it is claimed that the resulting wines possess better organoleptic properties, particularly more complex flavor and aroma. 

Miscellaneous Derivatives. Fimehc acid is used as an intermediate in some pharmaceuticals and in aroma chemicals ethylene brassylate is a synthetic musk (114). Salts of the diacids have shown utUity as surfactants and as corrosion inhibitors. The alkaline, ammonium, or organoamine salts of glutaric acid (115) or C-5—C-16 diacids (116) are useflil as noncorrosive components for antifreeze formulations, as are methylene azelaic acid and its alkah metal salt (117). Salts derived from C-21 diacids are used primarily as surfactants and find apphcation in detergents, fabric softeners, metal working fluids, and lubricants (118). The salts of the unsaturated C-20 diacid also exhibit anticorrosion properties, and the sodium salts of the branched C-20 diacids have the abUity to complex heavy metals from dilute aqueous solutions (88). 

Ultrafiltration of heterogenous colloidal suspensions such as citrus juice is complex and many factors other than molecular weight contribute to fouling and permeation. For example, low MW aroma compounds were unevenly distributed in the permeate and retentate in UF in 500 kd MWCO system (10). The authors observed that the 500 kd MWCO UF removed all suspended solids, including pectin and PE. If PE is complexed to pectate in an inactive complex, then it is conceivable that release of PE from pectin with cations will enhance permeation in UF. At optimum salt concentration, less PE activation was observed at lower pH values than at higher pH (15). In juice systems, it is difficult to separate the effect of juice particulates on PE activity. Model studies with PE extracts allows UF in the absence of large or insoluble particulates and control of composition of the ultrafilter. In... 

Sulfur compounds are renowned for unpleasant odors beginning with the rotten egg smell of H2S and many are responsible for the off-flavors of various foods. Nevertheless, some sulfur compounds provide the pleasant odors associated with many plants and are also prominent in desirable food flavors. The determination of flavor or aroma is very complex since large numbers of components may be involved both for microorganisms and plants. Many flavor compounds, of course, do not contain sulfur. Much has been and continues to be written. We can only convey an eclectic flavor of the many situations involving sulfur compounds - a tasting menu. The colorful language of experts in aroma and taste bears a close resemblance to that of enophiles. 

As these examples indicate, the characteristic flavor of a food, fruit, etc., usually derives from a complex mixture of components. In a few cases, one unique sulfur compound is a character-impact compound, a material recognized as having the same organoleptic character as the material itself. Although some 670 compounds, of which more than 100 are sulfur-containing, have been identified in roast coffee, one material, furfurylmercaptan (2-furylmethanethiol) is considered to be a character-impact compound.43,44 The threshold level for detection of 2-furylmethanethiol in water is 0.005 ppb, and at levels of 0.01-0.5 ppb, it has the very characteristic aroma of freshly roasted coffee. However, as in many other cases, there is a concentration effect. At levels from 1-10 ppb the aroma is that of staled coffee with a sulfury note .43 Hence, 2-furylmethanethiol has a two headed property - at low concentrations it is a character impact compound and at higher levels it is an off-flavor component. 

Multiple senses, including taste, contribute to our total perception of food. Our perception of the flavor of food is a complex experience based upon multiple senses taste per se, which includes sweet, sour, salty and bitter olfaction, which includes aromas touch, also termed mouth feel , that is, texture and fat content and thermoreception and nociception caused by pungent spices and irritants. Taste proper is commonly divided into four categories of primary stimuli sweet, sour, salty and bitter. One other primary taste quality, termed umami (the taste of L-glutamate), is still somewhat controversial. Mixtures of these primaries can mimic the tastes of more complex foods. 

---