Anionic surfactants general

Early work by protein chemists referred to in earlier chapters had revealed that the properties of proteins in solution can be substantially changed by addition of ionic surfactants (see also Ref. 113). In outline (1) Below their isoelectric point, proteins complex strongly with anionic surfactants, generally forming precipitates that can usually be solubilized on... 

Anionic Surfactants. In terms of general usage in cosmetic products, the anionics are by far the most widely used and are chiefly found in shampoo systems. They provide the formulator with the basic conditions for preparing these products, ie, foaming, cleansing, and solubiHty. 

Lignites and lignosulfonates can act as o/w emulsifiers, but generally are added for other purposes. Various anionic surfactants, including alkylarylsulfonates and alkylaryl sulfates and poly(ethylene oxide) derivatives of fatty acids, esters, and others, are used. Very Httle oil is added to water-base muds in use offshore for environmental reasons. A nonionic poly(ethylene oxide) derivative of nonylphenol [9016-45-9] is used in calcium-treated muds (126). 

Ethoxylation of alkyl amine ethoxylates is an economical route to obtain the variety of properties required by numerous and sometimes smaH-volume industrial uses of cationic surfactants. Commercial amine ethoxylates shown in Tables 27 and 28 are derived from linear alkyl amines, ahphatic /-alkyl amines, and rosin (dehydroabietyl) amines. Despite the variety of chemical stmctures, the amine ethoxylates tend to have similar properties. In general, they are yellow or amber Hquids or yellowish low melting soHds. Specific gravity at room temperature ranges from 0.9 to 1.15, and they are soluble in acidic media. Higher ethoxylation promotes solubiUty in neutral and alkaline media. The lower ethoxylates form insoluble salts with fatty acids and other anionic surfactants. Salts of higher ethoxylates are soluble, however. Oil solubiUty decreases with increasing ethylene oxide content but many ethoxylates with a fairly even hydrophilic—hydrophobic balance show appreciable oil solubiUty and are used as solutes in the oil phase. 

Finally, some general rules for the amount of surfactant appear to be vaHd (13). For anionic surfactants the average size of droplets is reduced for an increase of surfactant concentration up to the critical micellization concentration, whereas for nonionic surfactants a reduction occurs also for concentrations in excess of this value. The latter case may reflect the solubiHty of the nonionic surfactant in both phases, causing a reduction of interfacial tension at higher concentrations, or may reflect the stabilizing action of the micelles per se. 

Protease performance is strongly influenced by detergent pH and ionic strength. Surfactants influence both protease performance and stabiUty in the wash solution. In general, anionic surfactants are more aggressive than amphoteric surfactants, which again are more aggressive than nonionic surfactants. 

The storage behavior of sulfosuccinates is generally enormously improved by the addition of anionic surfactants. It is well known that addition of only 10% of NLES, for example, doubles the possible storage time of a sensitive ... 

In this physical methodology, hand-rinsing the volunteers immediately following the activity period removed some test substance from the hands if left on the hands, this substance would have had the opportunity to be absorbed and therefore would have increased the biomonitoring values. In addition, we do not currently know the efficiency of the hand rinse. It is generally thought that the efficiency of the hand rinse using anionic surfactants to remove chlorpyrifos is no better than 50%,5 a value to be determined in future research. 

Surfactants, not surprisingly, exert a highly significant influence on the fluorescence of FBAs in solution. This effect is associated with the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant and may be regarded as a special type of solvent effect. Anionic surfactants have almost no influence on the performance of anionic FBAs on cotton, but nonionic surfactants may exert either positive or negative effects on the whiteness of the treated substrate [33]. Cationic surfactants would be expected to have a negative influence, but this is not always so [34]. No general rule can be formulated and each case has to be considered separately. 

The non-ionic surfactants do not produce ions in aqueous solution. The solubility of non-ionic surfactants in water is due to the presence of functional groups in the molecules that have a strong affinity for water. Similarly to the anionic surfactants, and any other group of surfactants, they also show the same general property of these products, which is the reduction of the surface tension of water. 

Other detection systems, such as conductivity detector or refractive index detection are generally applicable for the determination of common anionic surfactants [1]. However, they are less sensitive than other techniques and are used more often for the characterisation of pure surfactants, than for their determination at low concentrations. 

As an example of an anionic surfactant mixture frequently contained in detergent formulations, an AES blend with the general formula C H2 i i—O—(CH2—CH2—O) —SO3 was examined in the negative FLAMS mode. Because of the considerable differences observed between both API ionisation mode overview spectra, the ESI—FIA—MS(—) and the APCI—FIA—MS(—) spectra are reproduced in Fig. 2.5.3(a) and (b), respectively. Ionisation of this blend in the positive APCI—FIA—MS mode, not presented here, leads to the destruction of the AES molecules by scission of the O—SO3 bond. Instead of the ions of the anionic surfactant mixture of AES, ions of AE can then be observed imaging the presence of non-ionic surfactants of AE type. 

Fluorinated phosphinic and phosphonic acid derivatives Perfluoro derivatives of alkyl phosphonic acid CnF2n+1-P(0)(0H)2 and alkyl phosphinic acid CnF2n+i(CmF2m+1)-P(0)0H (n = m or n m) shown with their general structural formulae in Fig. 2.11.29(1) and (II) were examined by negative ESI- and APCI-FIA-MS. These anionic surfactant compounds contained perfluoro alkyl chains [2,22,25]. By analogy with their behaviour in the TSI-FIA-MS(—) process [25], the phosphonic acid formed [M — H] ions at m/z 399 and 499... 

Nevertheless, surfactant sorption isotherms on natural surfaces (sediments and biota) are generally non-linear, even at very low concentrations. Their behaviour may be explained by a Freundlich isotherm, which is adequate for anionic [3,8,14,20,30], cationic [7] and non-ionic surfactants [2,4,15,17] sorbed onto solids with heterogeneous surfaces. Recently, the virial-electrostatic isotherm has been proposed to explain anionic surfactant sorption this is of special interest since it can be interpreted on a mechanistic basis [20]. The virial equation is similar to a linear isotherm with an exponential factor, i.e. with a correction for the deviation caused by the heterogeneity of the surface or the energy of sorption. 

---