Analytical methodology for air samples

Pesticides may enter the atmosphere during spray applications of the formulated product, by volatilization, through management practices, via wind-distributed soil particles containing absorbed pesticides, etc. Several analytical methods have been reported over the last 30 years for the determination of pesticides in air, and all involve the passage of known volumes of air for a pre-defined time period through an adsorbent material to trap the desired analytes. These analytes are then extracted, concentrated, and analyzed. A few analytical methods have been reported for the determination of triazine compounds in air in the last decade. 

Polyurethane foam (PUF) plugs were used to trap atrazine, simazine, DEA, and DIA when air was drawn through experimental chambers at 2.9m min . ° The plugs 

All previous discussion has focused on sample preparation, i.e., removal of the targeted analyte(s) from the sample matrix, isolation of the analyte(s) from other co-extracted, undesirable sample components, and transfer of the analytes into a solvent suitable for final analysis. Over the years, numerous types of analytical instruments have been employed for this final analysis step as noted in the preceding text and Tables 3 and 4. Overall, GC and LC are the most often used analytical techniques, and modern GC and LC instrumentation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection systems are currently the analytical techniques of choice. Methods relying on spectrophotometric detection and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) are now rarely employed, except perhaps for qualitative purposes. 

Chromatographic systems were finally coupled with relatively inexpensive, yet powerful, detection systems with the advent of the quadrupole mass selective detector (MSD). The operational complexity of this type of instrumentation has significantly declined over the last 15 years, thus allowing routine laboratory use. These instruments 

Early work relied on the use of packed columns, but all modern GC analyses are accomplished using capillary columns with their higher theoretical plate counts and resolution and improved sensitivity. Although a variety of analytical columns have been employed for the GC of triazine compounds, the columns most often used are fused-silica capillary columns coated with 5% phenyl-95% methylpolysiloxane. These nonpolar columns in conjunction with the appropriate temperature and pressure programming and pressure pulse spiking techniques provide excellent separation and sensitivity for the triazine compounds. Typically, columns of 30 m x 0.25-mm i.d. and 0.25-qm film thickness are used of which numerous versions are commercially available (e.g., DB-5, HP-5, SP-5, CP-Sil 8 CB, etc.). Of course, the column selected must be considered in conjunction with the overall design and goals of the particular study. 

---