Analytic practices procedure blanks

The frequency of blank determination depends on blank magnitude and variability in relation to the level of analyte in the sample and analytical precision desired, hi standard applications, one or two procedural blanks are processed with a set of 10 or more samples. Special cases concerned with reliable analyses at unavoidably high blank levels, require as many blanks as samples. It must be remembered that conceptually and in practice, the procedural blank is different from the sample in that it contains no sample matrix. Physical and chemical behaviour of the blank, therefore, during sample treatment and subsequent operations will not simulate exactly the behaviour of the sample, with the consequence that the blank value is only an estimate of adventitious contamination and losses occurring during processing of actual samples. 

While this chapter discusses a topic that is largely practical in nature, it is important that students engage in thinking about the processes used in analysis. Table 9.2 summarises the rationale behind different aspects of the tests described here. A useful activity with some classes might be to provide them with a version of this table with the second column blank, and ask students to work in small groups to suggest sensible reasons for the details of the procedures. This will ensure they understand why certain practice procedures are adopted and makes it more likely that they will remember to follow those procedures in their own analytical work. 

H. Make sure the sum of the spectra of the components is the spectrum of the mixture. Components can be lost during the separation processes, and contaminants may be added. Processing blanks through the same procedures as the unknown is a necessary part of good analytical practice. 

Third, the bulk of the items in Table 1 address method performance. These requirements must be satisfied on a substrate-by-substrate basis to address substrate-specific interferences. As discussed above, interferences are best dealt with by application of conventional sample preparation techniques use of blank substrate to account for background interferences is not permitted. The analyst must establish a limit of detection (LOD), the lowest standard concentration that yields a signal that can be differentiated from background, and an LOQ (the reader is referred to Brady for a discussion of different techniques used to determine the LOD for immunoassays). For example, analysis of a variety of corn fractions requires the generation of LOD and LOQ data for each fraction. Procedural recoveries must accompany each analytical set and be based on fresh fortification of substrate prior to extraction. Recovery samples serve to confirm that the extraction and cleanup procedures were conducted correctly for all samples in each set of analyses. Carrying control substrate through the analytical procedure is good practice if practicable. 

It is important to point out that the quality of analytical results is not immediate it can only be achieved if an extensive set of measures are adopted and complied with. Therefore, in parallel to the development of the QA concept, QC systems were introduced as an important tool supporting the QA of chemical measurements. The QC process of examination of laboratory performance in time should always follow QA. QC thus comprises a set of operational techniques and activities used to check whether the requirements for quality are fulfilled. In practice, QC in an analytical chemistry laboratory implies operations carried out daily during the collection, preparation, and analysis of samples, which are designed to ensure that the laboratory can provide accurate and precise results. QC procedures are intended to ensure the quality of results for specific samples or batches of samples and include the analysis of reference materials (RMs), blind samples, blanks, spiked samples, duplicate, and other control samples.2... 

In practice an instrumental detection limit is of limited use because in analytical chemistry it is rare that no other procedural steps are involved. Normally a limit of detection for the whole analytical method is required. The terminology used in this area is confusing. In general, limit of detection and detection limit are synonymous. The detection limit will encompass factors such as (a) sample matrix effects (b) loss of the analyte during sample preparation etc. The detection limit for the analytical procedure is defined as The minimum single result which, with a stated prohahility, can be distinguished from a suitable blank value . ... 

The magnitude of the analytical blank is influenced by a number of factors, both determinate and indeterminate. Murphy (14) has discussed the role of the analytical blank and emphasized that it is both the variability and the magnitude of the blank which ultimately determine practical lower detection limits. Efforts to develop procedures for analysis at the nanogram/gram level must therefore be directed toward minimizing those factors. 

Accuracy and precision. Based on reproducibility of pure standard gases and aqueous standard solutions, the overall analytical precision of He ages determined by this procedure should be about 2% (2o, excluding errors in a-ejection correction) when ages are well above blank levels. Most of this uncertainty arises from the He measurement. In actual practice, we obtain He ages that reproduce to about 6% (2o), demonstrating some natural variability within grain populations. 

In the above equation, E represents the analyte element, and m may be, but need not necessarily be, equal to n (e.g. when the analyte occurs in various oxidation states). Reduction by Zn/HO requires that the analytes be present in their lower oxidation states prior to reaction. When this is not the case, the analytes must be reduced, e. g. by SnCl2 in an acidic medium. The formation of volatile hydrides (and of excess hydrogen) is then initiated by the addition of zinc metal. This reaction is rather inconvenient, since it is slow, difficult to automate, and subject to high blank values due to the impurities of the zinc. Also its efficiency is hmited as a consequence of incomplete reaction and the possibihty of adsorption or entrapment in the zinc sludge of the volatile metal hydrides formed. Due to these disadvantages, the use of this procedure has nowadays been practically abandoned. 

Limit of detection (LOD) is the lowest concentration of an analyte that the bioanalytical procedure can reliably differentiate from background noise. There are several approaches for determining the LOD (ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, 2005), but a common practice is to evaluate the variability of the analytical background response of blank samples. To estimate the LOD, run blank (e.g., assay buffer, zero calibrator) sample replicates (>6) across one or more runs and calculate the mean background value 2 SD or 3SD to define the LOD. Although commonly used to define the sensitivity of an assay, LOD should be used with caution because the value is defined in an inherently variable region of the curve and is based upon a user-defined calculation. 

The limit of detection (LD) or sensivity is commonly defined as the lowest concentration level that is statistically different from a blank at a specified level of confidence. In practice, the LD for a given analyte is seldom limited by the sensivity of the analytical technique, but governed by the level and variability of the blank value i.e., impurities introduced with reagents, procedural steps, apparatus, air and instrumental variations. It is generally accepted by analysts e.g., Kaiser, 1970 Tolg, 1972 Keith, 1991) and will be adopted here that an analytical result (Xa) is considered as real and different from the blank if it is at least as great as the mean blank value (Ahi) plus 3 standard deviations of the blank value (sbi) ... 

---