Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Analysis internal standard

Internal standard calibration is used when the changes in the analytical system are known to be frequent and substantial. To compensate for these changes, internal standards at known concentrations are added to all calibration standards, field samples, and laboratory QC samples prior to analysis. Internal standards are synthetic analogs of specific target compounds or compounds that are similar in nature to the target analytes and that are not found in environmental samples. Internal standard calibration is a requirement of GC/MS methods. Laboratories sometimes use it for GC methods as it significantly improves the accuracy of compound quantitation. [Pg.249]

Recoveries also depend on the wine matrix white and red wines differ for volatiles and polyphenols, and contents of alcohol and sugars. For quantitative analysis, internal standards have to be spiked to the sample in suitable concentration, such as dimethyl sulfide-d6 (d6-DMS) 25 pg/L, dipropyl disulfide (DPDS) 25 pg/L, 4-methylthiazole (MT) lOpg/L, and 3-(methylthio)-l-hexanol (MTH) 50pg/L. A white wine matrix can be used [e.g., 10% v/v ethanol, sugar content <4g/L, and a polyphenolic content of 115mg/L expressed as (+)-catechin] for preparation of standard solutions to calculate the calibration curve for analytes, containing total S02 corrected to 100 g/L and previously treated twice with charcoal 3 g/L to remove sulfur and less polar volatile compounds (higher alcohols are not removed). [Pg.127]

Internal standards Compounds added to every standard, blank, matrix spike, matike spike duplicate, sample (for volatile organics), and sample extract (for semivolatiles) at a known concentration, prior to analysis. Internal standards are used as the basis for quantification of the target compound. [Pg.593]

Standardization—External standards, standard additions, and internal standards are a common feature of many quantitative analyses. Suggested experiments using these standardization methods are found in later chapters. A good project experiment for introducing external standardization, standard additions, and the importance of the sample s matrix is to explore the effect of pH on the quantitative analysis of an acid-base indicator. Using bromothymol blue as an example, external standards can be prepared in a pH 9 buffer and used to analyze samples buffered to different pHs in the range of 6-10. Results can be compared with those obtained using a standard addition. [Pg.130]

A standard sample was prepared containing 10.0 ppm of an analyte and 15.0 ppm of an internal standard. Analysis of the sample gave signals for the analyte and internal standard of 0.155 and 0.233 (arbitrary units), respectively. Sufficient internal standard was added to a sample to make it 15.0 ppm in the internal standard. Analysis of the sample yielded signals for the analyte and internal standard of 0.274 and 0.198, respectively. Report the concentration of analyte in the sample. [Pg.131]

Troost and Olavesen investigated the application of an internal standardization to the quantitative analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. The following results were obtained for the analysis of the analyte phenanthrene using isotopically labeled phenanthrene as an internal standard... [Pg.133]

Samples of analyte are dissolved in a suitable solvent and placed on the IR card. After the solvent evaporates, the sample s spectrum is obtained. Because the thickness of the PE or PTEE film is not uniform, the primary use for IR cards has been for qualitative analysis. Zhao and Malinowski showed how a quantitative analysis for polystyrene could be performed by adding an internal standard of KSCN to the sample. Polystyrene was monitored at 1494 cm- and KSCN at 2064 cm-. Standard solutions were prepared by placing weighed portions of polystyrene in a 10-mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with a solution of 10 g/L KSCN in... [Pg.453]

What is the %w/w Pb in a sample of brass that gives an emission intensity of 9.25 X lO" The analysis for Ni uses an internal standard. Results for a typical calibration are shown in the following table. ... [Pg.456]

Zinc can be used as an internal standard in the analysis of thallium by differential pulse polarography. A standard... [Pg.538]

Precision The precision of a gas chromatographic analysis includes contributions from sampling, sample preparation, and the instrument. The relative standard deviation due to the gas chromatographic portion of the analysis is typically 1-5%, although it can be significantly higher. The principal limitations to precision are detector noise and the reproducibility of injection volumes. In quantitative work, the use of an internal standard compensates for any variability in injection volumes. [Pg.577]

One advantage of an HPLC analysis is that a loop injector often eliminates the need for an internal standard. Why is an internal standard used in this analysis What assumption(s) must we make about the internal standard ... [Pg.589]

A quantitative analysis for vitamin Bi was carried out using this procedure. When a solution of 100.0 ppm Bi and 100.0 ppm o-ethoxybenzamide was analyzed, the peak area for vitamin Bi was 71 % of that for the internal standard. The analysis of a 0.125-g vitamin B complex tablet gave a peak area for vitamin Bi that was 1.82 times as great as that for the internal standard. How many milligrams of vitamin Bi are in the tablet ... [Pg.608]

Caffeine in coffee, tea, and soda is determined by a solid-phase microextraction using an uncoated silica fiber, followed by a GC analysis using a capillary SPB-5 column with an MS detector. Standard solutions are spiked with G3 caffeine as an internal standard. [Pg.612]

This experiment describes a quantitative analysis for caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline in tea, pain killers, and cocoa. Separations are accomplished by MEKC using a pH 8.25 borate-phosphate buffer with added SDS. A UV detector set to 214 nm is used to record the electropherogram. An internal standard of phenobarbital is included for quantitative work. [Pg.614]

After heating to 50 °C in a water bath, the sample was cooled to below room temperature and filtered. The residue was washed with two 5-mL portions of CCI4, and the combined filtrates were collected in a 25-mL volumetric flask. After adding 2.00 mL of the internal standard solution, the contents of the flask were diluted to volume with CCI4. Analysis of an approximately 2- tL sample gave LfD signals of f3.5 for the terpene hydrate and 24.9 for the camphor. Report the %w/w camphor in the analgesic ointment. [Pg.616]

After adding a 10.00-mL portion of the internal standard, the solution was filtered. Analysis of the sample gave a peak height ratio of 23.2 for ASA and 17.9 for CAE. [Pg.618]

The analysis of N03 in aquarium water was carried out by CZE using 104 as an internal standard. A standard solution of 15.0-ppm N03 and 10.0-ppm 104 gives peak heights (arbitrary units) of 95.0 and 100.1, respectively. A sample of water from an aquarium is diluted 1 100, and sufficient internal standard added to make its concentration 10.0 ppm. Analysis gives signals of 29.2 and 105.8 for N03 and 104 , respectively. Report the parts per million of N03 in the sample of aquarium water. [Pg.619]

Radiochemical methods of analysis take advantage of the decay of radioactive isotopes. A direct measurement of the rate at which a radioactive isotope decays may be used to determine its concentration in a sample. For analytes that are not naturally radioactive, neutron activation often can be used to induce radioactivity. Isotope dilution, in which a radioactively labeled form of an analyte is spiked into the sample, can be used as an internal standard for quantitative work. [Pg.659]

The most useful methods for quality assessment are those that are coordinated by the laboratory and that provide the analyst with immediate feedback about the system s state of statistical control. Internal methods of quality assessment included in this section are the analysis of duplicate samples, the analysis of blanks, the analysis of standard samples, and spike recoveries. [Pg.708]

Internal standards at a known concentration are added to the sample after its preparation but prior to analysis to check for GC retention-time accuracy and response stability. If the internal standard responses are in error by more than a factor of two, the analysis must be stopped and the initial calibration repeated. Only if all the criteria have been met can sample analysis begin. [Pg.300]

Chromatographic peak areas are calculated automatically by the data system by reference to the response obtained from certain specified, compound-dependent ions. From the peak areas of the target compounds, quantification is achieved by comparison with the internal standards, which are present in known concentration. The laboratory responsible for the analysis must report the target compounds and all tentatively identified (nontarget) compounds. Standard EPA forms must be completed and submitted. A laboratory is said to be in compliance when it has satisfied all aspects of its CLP contract. [Pg.301]

Continuing calibration for a Series Method is performed using calibration check compounds. Surrogate compounds are added to the matrix before sample preparation to evaluate recovery levels. To check GC retention times, internal standards are added to a sample after its preparation for analysis. [Pg.418]

An hplc assay was developed suitable for the analysis of enantiomers of ketoprofen (KT), a 2-arylpropionic acid nonsteroidal antiinflammatory dmg (NSAID), in plasma and urine (59). Following the addition of racemic fenprofen as internal standard (IS), plasma containing the KT enantiomers and IS was extracted by Hquid-Hquid extraction at an acidic pH. After evaporation of the organic layer, the dmg and IS were reconstituted in the mobile phase and injected onto the hplc column. The enantiomers were separated at ambient temperature on a commercially available 250 x 4.6 mm amylose carbamate-packed chiral column (chiral AD) with hexane—isopropyl alcohol—trifluoroacetic acid (80 19.9 0.1) as the mobile phase pumped at 1.0 mL/min. The enantiomers of KT were quantified by uv detection with the wavelength set at 254 nm. The assay allows direct quantitation of KT enantiomers in clinical studies in human plasma and urine after adrninistration of therapeutic doses. [Pg.245]

Approved techniques for manual and mechanical sampling are often documented for various commodities handled in commerce by industiy groups. Examples are the International Standards Organization (ISO), British Standards Association (BSA), Japan Institute of Standards (JIS), American Society for Testing Materi s (ASTM), and the Fertihzer Institute. Sampling standards developed for use in specified industry applications frequently include instructions for labora-toiy work in sample preparation and analysis—steps (2) and (3) above. [Pg.1756]

Presently efforts of Ukrainian scientists in field of analysis of toxic organic substances directed on harmonization of the developed methods of analysis with the requirements of international standards and on wide introduction in practice of the quality control system in chromatographic researches. [Pg.65]

The proposed PAS-FTIR procedure allows the determination of 30 samples h does not require any sample pre-treatment and avoids waste generation. So, it can conclude that the PAS-FTIR methodology is a reliable alternative to long and tedious classical method of analysis of Mancozeb and improves the sample frequency achieved by the FTIR procedure based on the measurement of KBr disks using internal standard. [Pg.93]

At X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) of samples of the limited weight is perspective to prepare for specimens as polymeric films on a basis of methylcellulose [1]. By the example of definition of heavy metals in film specimens have studied dependence of intensity of X-ray radiation from their chemical compound, surface density (P ) and the size (D) particles of the powder introduced to polymer. Have theoretically established, that the basic source of an error of results XRF is dependence of intensity (F) analytical lines of determined elements from a specimen. Thus the best account of variations P provides a method of the internal standard at change P from 2 up to 6 mg/sm the coefficient of variation describing an error of definition Mo, Zn, Cu, Co, Fe and Mn in a method of the direct external standard, reaches 40 %, and at use of a method of the internal standard (an element of comparison Ga) value does not exceed 2,2 %. Experiment within the limits of a casual error (V changes from 2,9 up to 7,4 %) has confirmed theoretical conclusions. [Pg.104]

Liquid chromatography was performed on symmetry 5 p.m (100 X 4.6 mm i.d) column at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of acetronitrile 0.043 M H PO (36 63, v/v) adjusted to pH 6.7 with 5 M NaOH and pumped at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. Detection of clarithromycin and azithromycin as an internal standard (I.S) was monitored on an electrochemical detector operated at a potential of 0.85 Volt. Each analysis required no longer than 14 min. Quantitation over the range of 0.05 - 5.0 p.g/ml was made by correlating peak area ratio of the dmg to that of the I.S versus concentration. A linear relationship was verified as indicated by a correlation coefficient, r, better than 0.999. [Pg.395]

Because of the complex nature of the discharge conditions, GD-OES is a comparative analytical method and standard reference materials must be used to establish a unique relationship between the measured line intensities and the elemental concentration. In quantitative bulk analysis, which has been developed to very high standards, calibration is performed with a set of calibration samples of composition similar to the unknown samples. Normally, a major element is used as reference and the internal standard method is applied. This approach is not generally applicable in depth-profile analysis, because the different layers encountered in a depth profile of ten comprise widely different types of material which means that a common reference element is not available. [Pg.225]

Figure 11.5 Chromatograms of plasma samples obtained with fully automated on-line SPE-LC (a) dmg-ffee human plasma (b) human plasma spiked with omeprazole (100 ng/ml) and phenacetin (internal standard 1000 ng/ml). Reprinted from Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 21, G. Garcia-Encina et al., Validation of an automated liquid chromatograpliic method for omeprazole in human plasma using on-line solid-phase exti action, pp. 371 - 382, copyright 1999, with permission from Elsevier Science. Figure 11.5 Chromatograms of plasma samples obtained with fully automated on-line SPE-LC (a) dmg-ffee human plasma (b) human plasma spiked with omeprazole (100 ng/ml) and phenacetin (internal standard 1000 ng/ml). Reprinted from Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 21, G. Garcia-Encina et al., Validation of an automated liquid chromatograpliic method for omeprazole in human plasma using on-line solid-phase exti action, pp. 371 - 382, copyright 1999, with permission from Elsevier Science.
Figure 11.14 Analysis of amphetamines by GC-NPD following HS-SPME exti action from human hair (a) Normal hair (b) normal hair after addition of amphetamine (1.5 ng) and methamphetamine (16.1 ng) (c) hair of an amphetamine abuser. Peak identification is as follows 1, a-phenethylamine (internal standard) 2, amphetamine 3, methamphetamine 4, N-propyl-/3-phenethyamine (internal standard). Reprinted from Journal of Chronatography, B 707,1. Koide et ai, Determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in human hair by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas cliromatography with niti ogen-phosphoms detection, pp. 99 -104, copyright 1998, with permission from Elsevier Science. Figure 11.14 Analysis of amphetamines by GC-NPD following HS-SPME exti action from human hair (a) Normal hair (b) normal hair after addition of amphetamine (1.5 ng) and methamphetamine (16.1 ng) (c) hair of an amphetamine abuser. Peak identification is as follows 1, a-phenethylamine (internal standard) 2, amphetamine 3, methamphetamine 4, N-propyl-/3-phenethyamine (internal standard). Reprinted from Journal of Chronatography, B 707,1. Koide et ai, Determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in human hair by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas cliromatography with niti ogen-phosphoms detection, pp. 99 -104, copyright 1998, with permission from Elsevier Science.

See other pages where Analysis internal standard is mentioned: [Pg.129]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.811]    [Pg.811]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.389]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Internal standards

International Standardization

International Standards

Standardization international standards

© 2024 chempedia.info