Analysis, computers interval

Vaidyanathan, R. and El-Halwagi, M. M. (1994). Global optimization of nonconvex nonlinear programs via interval analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng., 18(10), 889-897. 

The completely reliable computational technique that we have developed is based on interval analysis. The interval Newton/generalized bisection technique can guarantee the identification of a global optimum of a nonlinear objective function, or can identify all solutions to a set of nonlinear equations. Since the phase equilibrium problem (i.e., particularly the phase stability problem) can be formulated in either fashion, we can guarantee the correct solution to the high-pressure flash calculation. A detailed description of the interval Newton/generalized bisection technique and its application to thermodynamic systems described by cubic equations of state can be found... 

Uncertainties inherent to the risk assessment process can be quantitatively described using, for example, statistical distributions, fuzzy numbers, or intervals. Corresponding methods are available for propagating these kinds of uncertainties through the process of risk estimation, including Monte Carlo simulation, fuzzy arithmetic, and interval analysis. Computationally intensive methods (e.g., the bootstrap) that work directly from the data to characterize and propagate uncertainties can also be applied in ERA. Implementation of these methods for incorporating uncertainty can lead to risk estimates that are consistent with a probabilistic definition of risk. 

Such a filtration probe has been tested with very good results in a number of analyses with a special enzyme thermistor version designed for use in industrial environments. Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an enzyme thermistor arranged for process monitoring by repeated flow injection analysis. The interval between sample injections is chosen with respect to how fast the analyte concentration changes. A typical figure is four to five sample injections per hour. The injection valve and a sample selector valve for selection of different samples or calibration solutions and the pumps are controlled with a personal computer with a 386 processor, which also... 

Byrne, R.P. and Bogle, I.D.L., 1999, Global optimisation of constrained non-convex programs using reformulations and interval analysis. Comput chem Engng, 23,... 

For catastrophic demand-related pump failures, the variability is explained by the following factors listed in their order of importance system application, pump driver, operating mode, reactor type, pump type, and unidentified plant-specific influences. Quantitative failure rate adjustments are provided for the effects of these factors. In the case of catastrophic time-dependent pump failures, the failure rate variability is explained by three factors reactor type, pump driver, and unidentified plant-specific Influences. Point and confidence interval failure rate estimates are provided for each selected pump by considering the influential factors. Both types of estimates represent an improvement over the estimates computed exclusively from the data on each pump. The coded IPRDS data used in the analysis is provided in an appendix. A similar treatment applies to the valve data. 

It may be useful to point out a few topics that go beyond a first course in control. With certain processes, we cannot take data continuously, but rather in certain selected slow intervals (c.f. titration in freshmen chemistry). These are called sampled-data systems. With computers, the analysis evolves into a new area of its own—discrete-time or digital control systems. Here, differential equations and Laplace transform do not work anymore. The mathematical techniques to handle discrete-time systems are difference equations and z-transform. Furthermore, there are multivariable and state space control, which we will encounter a brief introduction. Beyond the introductory level are optimal control, nonlinear control, adaptive control, stochastic control, and fuzzy logic control. Do not lose the perspective that control is an immense field. Classical control appears insignificant, but we have to start some where and onward we crawl. 

A major limitation of the linearized forms of the Michaelis-Menten equation is that none provides accurate estimates of both Km and Vmax. Furthermore, it is impossible to obtain meaningful error estimates for the parameters, since linear regression is not strictly appropriate. With the advent of more sophisticated computer tools, there is an increasing trend toward using the integrated rate equation and nonlinear regression analysis to estimate Km and While this type of analysis is more complex than the linear approaches, it has several benefits. First, accurate nonbiased estimates of Km and Vmax can be obtained. Second, nonlinear regression may allow the errors (or confidence intervals) of the parameter estimates to be determined. 

ESE envelope modulation. In the context of the present paper the nuclear modulation effect in ESE is of particular interest110, mi. Rowan et al.1 1) have shown that the amplitude of the two- and three-pulse echoes1081 does not always decay smoothly as a function of the pulse time interval r. Instead, an oscillation in the envelope of the echo associated with the hf frequencies of nuclei near the unpaired electron is observed. In systems with a large number of interacting nuclei the analysis of this modulated envelope by computer simulation has proved to be difficult in the time domain. However, it has been shown by Mims1121 that the Fourier transform of the modulation data of a three-pulse echo into the frequency domain yields a spectrum similar to that of an ENDOR spectrum. Merks and de Beer1131 have demonstrated that the display in the frequency domain has many advantages over the parameter estimation procedure in the time domain. 

Bounds are often easier to compute than approximate estimates, which, in contrast, commonly require the solving of integrals. This simplicity of calculation extends to the combination of bounds. If, for instance, one set of information tells us that A is in a particular interval and another set tells us that A is in a different interval, it is straightforward to compute what the aggregate data set is implying simply by taking the intersection of the 2 intervals. When we have 2 estimates from separate approximations, on the other hand, we would have to invoke a much more complicated meta-analysis to combine the estimates. 

When a particular component eluting at a certain retention volume is to be estimated, this approach can be outlined as follows. Since SEC is extremely reproducible, the peak shape, peak width and peak height are dependent on the amount of the species in the sample volume injected, sample volume and retention time. From these factors the SEC peaks can be simulated or elution pattern of any species within the separation range can be plotted as a function of mass vs. retention volume. The analysis data supplies the concentration of this particular species over two or more 0.5 ml intervals. A match-up computer program has to be developed so that it can pick up the peak shape and concentration based on 3 or 4 data points at known Intervals. 

---