Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Amended testing

Amended testing involves adding nutrients to flasks of native soil and groundwater, and proceeding in the same manner as the previous task descriptions. If several nutrient ranges are tested, the optimum concentration of nutrients can be determined. After evaluation of several test sets, the relative concentrations of nutrients and pH can also be determined. Alternative testing may include addition of specialized microbes to evaluate their performance. [Pg.282]

Physical evidence serves two purposes. In some cases it is used to prove a component or element of a crime. Eor example, in a case involving trafficking in cocaine [50-36-2] the prosecutor must prove that the white powder found in the criminal s possession was cocaine (Table 1). The forensic chemist tests the substance and issues a report. If the powder is methamphetamine [537-46-2] the charge must be amended. [Pg.484]

In 1962, amendments to the U.S. Federal Food, Dmg and Cosmetic Act (Kefauver-Harris amendments) promulgated regulations concerning the requirements for premarketing approval by the FDA. This legislation estabUshed requirements of proof of both safety and therapeutic efficacy and strict control of human clinical testing, for example, which have extended the time and cost to market a new dmg. Thus, whereas approximately 40 new dmgs were marketed annually from 1948 to 1962, this number had fallen to 12 by 1966. [Pg.224]

Specifications and Standards Test Methods. Ethylcellulose is cleared foi many apphcations in food and food contact under the Eedeial Eood, Dmg, and Cosmetic Act, as amended. Examples include binder in dry vitamin preparations for animal feed, coatings and inks for paper and paperboard products used in food packaging, and closures with sealing gaskets for food containers (44). Methods of analyses ate given in ASTM D914-72 (19), NationalFonmila XIV, and Food Chemicals Codex II. [Pg.278]

Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (OR ) regulations were fust proposed m 1987 but were met with a litany of technical and safety issues that delayed the requirement. The 1990 CAA amendments required the implementation of ORVR and the EPA regulation requires passenger cars to first have the systems starting in 1998. The ORVR test will be performed in a SHED and will require that not more than 0.2 grams of hydrocarbon vapor per gallon of dispensed fuel be released from the vehicle. [Pg.238]

The government is charged by the Constitution with a responsibility for the public welfare, (a) Discuss the government s responsibility in controlling the risks in society, (b) Tobacco is not subject to the Delaney Amendment that bans material that can be demonstrated to cause cancci m animafs regardless of the quantity of material used in the tests. Why aren t all materials subject to the same ruk-s ... [Pg.34]

The tests and inspections carried out need to be to the same specifications and procedures as those used for the original production part approval and as amended by subsequent approved engineering changes. The results of the tests should be recorded in the same format as the original tests, unless otherwise required by the customer. [Pg.390]

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) published a standard in 1984 for the design, testing and locating of deflagration and detonation flame arresters and high velocity vent valves for cargo tanks in tanker ships (IMO 1984). This was amended in 1988 and reissued as Revision I (IMO 1988). A new revised standard was issued in 1994 (IMO 1994). [Pg.12]

The results of these experiments have been considered by the Joint Committee for the Co-ordination of the Cathodic Protection of Buried Structures and, in view of the various types of buried structures concerned and the circumstances in which field tests are conducted, the Committee decided not to amend its provisional recommendation that when cathodic protection is applied to a buried structure the maximum permissible potential change in the positive direction on a nearby pipe or cable should be 20 mV. If there is a history of corrosion on the unprotected installation no detectable positive change in structure/soil potential should be permitted. These criteria of interaction have been adopted in the British Standard Code of Practice for Cathodic Protection . [Pg.238]

Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components and amending Directive 2001/83/EC Amended by Commission Directive 2003/63/EC of 25 June 2003 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use... [Pg.9]

Requirements for labelling of containers for supply may differ from those for conveyance. Key features of a supply label are to identify the substance (the chemical name in most cases) and any hazards and safety precuations. In Europe the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances is covered by Directive 67/548/EEC as amended. This requires labels to identify appropriate risk and safety phrases (Tables 12.2 and 12.3) depending upon product properties. A substance is considered dangerous if in Part lA of an approved list or if it exhibits hazardous properties as defined in Schedule 1 for supply, or Schedule 2 for conveyance as shown in Tables 12.4 and 12.5. Substances not tested should be labelled Caution — substance not yet fully tested . Criteria for risk phrases are provided, e.g. as in Table 12.6 for toxic compounds. [Pg.311]

Where necessary the manufacturer must carry out, or arrange for, safety testing. Many countries operate mandatory premanufacturing and premarketing notification schemes of which safety testing is the cornerstone. Within the European Community under Directive 67/548/EEC and its sixth amendment 79/831/EEC, Competent Authorities must be... [Pg.319]

Preparation of seedlings for treatments with extract-amended nutrient solution was similar to that described for testing the effects of phenolic acids, except 40 plants were used per treatment and no replacement of the nutrient solution was made during the treatment period. Data collection procedures were modified in that only ab-axial leaf resistance was obtained and water potential was determined from four plants each day. Prior work established that abaxial resistance provided an adequate indicator of stomatal effects. The data were analyzed as described in experiments with pCA and FA. [Pg.182]

During ISCO, oxidants and any necessary amendments are introduced to the treatment area with one or more of the available delivery approaches. Pilot-scale testing is often used to determine the type of amendment and delivery system used at a given site. Some of the key considerations for the common oxidants and delivery approaches are summarized below. [Pg.1025]


See other pages where Amended testing is mentioned: [Pg.618]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.2305]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.860]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1016]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.282 ]




SEARCH



Amendments

Toxicity testing Sixth Amendment

© 2024 chempedia.info