Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption layer theories

Contact secondary nucleation has been explained by two possible mechanisms, namely, the adsorption layer theory and microattrition (4). The adsorption layer theory involves displacement of a surface layer of organized molecules (precrystalline)... [Pg.102]

In the dynamic adsorption layer theory of Deqaguin-Dukhin, the hydrodynamic field of a bubble can be assumed to be known as first approximate, while the more difficult stagnant cap problem has still to be solved. For the solution of this hydrodynamic problem unusual and very difficult boundary conditions exist which are very inconvenient even after essential simplifications. The hydrodynamic field of a bubble is studied imder the assumption that the stagnant cap is completely immobilised and any motion of the surface beyond the stagnant cap is ignored. Since the description of the stagnant cap is to a large extent a hydrodynamic problem, it has received less attention (cf. Section 8.7). [Pg.280]

To approach real conditions in the dynamic adsorption layer theory at small Reynolds numbers, one has to take into account that the motion of a surface is strongly retarded already without the presence of a surfactant, i.e. one should introduce the phenomenological retardation coefficient The velocity distribution along a retarded surface is given by. [Pg.296]

Unlike the limiting cases of the dynamic adsorption layer theories, using well-known hydrodynamic solutions, the theory of the transient state is very complex. The hydrodynamic equations have to be solved with very complicated boundary conditions taking into... [Pg.319]

Although considerable success in the development of the dynamic adsorption layer theory has been reached, there has been less progress experimentally. This is not marked for the transient state, where the theoretical advances are most impressive. It turns out that experimental works devoted to the stagnant cap theory are more or less of empirical interest as they are restricted to small Reynolds numbers. At small, and even intermediate, Reynolds numbers the bubble surface can initially behave immobile and the formation of a stagnant cap is almost impossible. [Pg.320]

In order to explain the mechanism and kinetics of crystal growth, surface energy, diffusion and adsorption layer theories have been invoked (1-4,20-23). [Pg.648]

A quantitative treatment for the depletive adsorption of iogenic species on semiconductors is that known as the boundary layer theory [84,184], in which it is assumed that, as a result of adsorption, a charged layer is formed. Doublelayer theory is applied, and it turns out that the change in surface potential due to adsorption of such a species is proportional to the square of the amount adsorbed. The important point is that very little adsorption, e.g., a 0 of about 0.003, can produce a volt or more potential change. See Ref. 185 for a review. [Pg.718]

In the potential region where nonequilibrium fluctuations are kept stable, subsequent pitting dissolution of the metal is kept to a minimum. In this case, the passive metal apparently can be treated as an ideally polarized electrode. Then, the passive film is thought to repeat more or less stochastically, rupturing and repairing all over the surface. So it can be assumed that the passive film itself (at least at the initial stage of dissolution) behaves just like an adsorption film dynamically formed by adsorbants. This assumption allows us to employ the usual double-layer theory including a diffuse layer and a Helmholtz layer. [Pg.258]

Conventional colloid chemistry and elaitrochemistry have always been clo ly related with each other, the keywords electrophoresis, double layer theory, and specific adsorption describing typical asp ts of this relationship. In more ro nt times, new aspects have arisen which again bring colloid chemistry into contact with modem developments in electrcolloidal particles as catalysts for electron transfer reactions and as photocatalysts. In fact, the similarity between the reactions that occur on colloidal particles and on compact electrodes has often been emphasized by calling the small particles microelectrodes . [Pg.115]

Clearly, then, the chemical and physical properties of liquid interfaces represent a significant interdisciplinary research area for a broad range of investigators, such as those who have contributed to this book. The chapters are organized into three parts. The first deals with the chemical and physical structure of oil-water interfaces and membrane surfaces. Eighteen chapters present discussion of interfacial potentials, ion solvation, electrostatic instabilities in double layers, theory of adsorption, nonlinear optics, interfacial kinetics, microstructure effects, ultramicroelectrode techniques, catalysis, and extraction. [Pg.9]

Studies of the adsorption of surface active electrolytes at the oil-water interface provide a convenient method for testing electrical double layer theory and for determining the state of water and ions in the neighborhood of an interface. The change in the surface amount of the large ions modifies the surface charge density. For instance, the surface ionic area of 100 per ion corresponds to 16, /rC/cm. The measurement of the concentration dependence of the changes of surface potential were also applied to find the critical concentration of formation of the micellar solution [18]. [Pg.35]

It is assumed that the quantity Cc is not a function of the electrolyte concentration c, and changes only with the charge cr, while Cd depends both on o and on c, according to the diffuse layer theory (see below). The validity of this relationship is a necessary condition for the case where the adsorption of ions in the double layer is purely electrostatic in nature. Experiments have demonstrated that the concept of the electrical double layer without specific adsorption is applicable to a very limited number of systems. Specific adsorption apparently does not occur in LiF, NaF and KF solutions (except at high concentrations, where anomalous phenomena occur). At potentials that are appropriately more negative than Epzc, where adsorption of anions is absent, no specific adsorption occurs for the salts of... [Pg.224]

In this paper we present results for a series of PEO fractions physically adsorbed on per-deutero polystyrene latex (PSL) in the plateau region of the adsorption isotherm. Hydro-dynamic and adsorption measurements have also been made on this system. Using a porous layer theory developed recently by Cohen Stuart (10) we have calculated the hydrodynamic thickness of these adsorbed polymers directly from the experimental density profiles. The results are then compared with model calculations based on density profiles obtained from the Scheutjens and Fleer (SF) layer model of polymer adsorption (11). [Pg.148]

The DLVO theory, a quantitative theory of colloid fastness based on electrostatic forces, was developed simultaneously by Deryaguin and Landau [75] and Verwey and Overbeek [76], These authors view the adsorptive layer as a charge carrier, caused by adsorption of ions, which establishes the same charge on all particles. The resulting Coulombic repulsion between these equally charged particles thus stabilizes the dispersion. This theory lends itself somewhat less to non-aqueous systems. [Pg.79]

Some emphasis is given in the first two chapters to show that complex formation equilibria permit to predict quantitatively the extent of adsorption of H+, OH , of metal ions and ligands as a function of pH, solution variables and of surface characteristics. Although the surface chemistry of hydrous oxides is somewhat similar to that of reversible electrodes the charge development and sorption mechanism for oxides and other mineral surfaces are different. Charge development on hydrous oxides often results from coordinative interactions at the oxide surface. The surface coordinative model describes quantitatively how surface charge develops, and permits to incorporate the central features of the Electric Double Layer theory, above all the Gouy-Chapman diffuse double layer model. [Pg.7]

The removal of an electron from an acceptor level or a hole from a donor level denotes, as we have seen, not the desorption of the chemisorbed particle but merely its transition from a state of strong to a state of weak bonding with the surface. The neglect of this weak form of chemisorption (i.e., electrically neutral form) which is characteristic of all papers on the boundary-layer theory of adsorption makes it quite impossible to depict the chemisorbed particle in terms of an energy level, i.e., to apply the energy band scheme depicted in Fig. 10 and used in these papers. ... [Pg.211]

Let us now consider another mechanism by which the imperfections affect the adsorptive and catalytic properties of the surface. This is based on their participation in the adsorption process as adsorption centers. The problem of chemisorption on an atomic imperfection has been treated quantum-mechanically by Bonch-Bruevich 98) it was discussed from the viewpoint of the boundary-layer theory by Hauffe 99) and has been investigated recently by Kogan and Sandomirsky 95). [Pg.251]

The deviations from the Szyszkowski-Langmuir adsorption theory have led to the proposal of a munber of models for the equihbrium adsorption of surfactants at the gas-Uquid interface. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the theories and assess their applicabihty to the adsorption of both ionic and nonionic surfactants at the gas-hquid interface. The thermodynamic approach of Butler [14] and the Lucassen-Reynders dividing surface [15] will be used to describe the adsorption layer state and adsorption isotherm as a function of partial molecular area for adsorbed nonionic surfactants. The traditional approach with the Gibbs dividing surface and Gibbs adsorption isotherm, and the Gouy-Chapman electrical double layer electrostatics will be used to describe the adsorption of ionic surfactants and ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. The fimdamental modeling of the adsorption processes and the molecular interactions in the adsorption layers will be developed to predict the parameters of the proposed models and improve the adsorption models for ionic surfactants. Finally, experimental data for surface tension will be used to validate the proposed adsorption models. [Pg.27]

Molecules in adsorbed layers have also a definite orientation. If a complete layer is formed over a surface, with those groups possessing the greatest attraction for the surface turned inward, we have virtually a new surface with properties determined by the nature of the groups which are directed outwards. There seems to be no very good reason why this, in certain cases, should not adsorb a second layer of molecules. Indeed, the assumption that this double-layer adsorption occurs has occasionally been found helpful. But there is a large difference between this extension of the single-layer theory and the atmospheric. theory. [Pg.191]

It is, on the other hand, necessary to adopt one or other of the really fundamental alternatives, namely, whether there is a definite saturation limit to adsorption, or whether the adsorption goes on increasing indefinitely with increasing concentration in the gaseous phase. The simplest form of the first alternative is the unimolecular layer theory, the simplest form of the second the atmospheric theory. It might be thought that an experimental decision between these two possibilities could be made quite easily. The matter is, however, not quite simple, since slow solution effects and other complications are often superposed on... [Pg.194]

Martin et al. (1996) studied the surface structures formed when 4-chloro-catechol adsorbs onto Ti02. These surface interactions were studied to gain a better understanding of how these surface structures affect photoreactivity. Adsorption isotherms of 4-chlorocatechol demonstrate that the compound adsorbs to a greater extent at pH values 7 to 9. The interactions of protons and 4-chlorocatechol with the Ti02 surface are explained by the double layer theory (Martin et al., 1996). [Pg.348]


See other pages where Adsorption layer theories is mentioned: [Pg.467]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.132]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.218 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption layer

Adsorption theory

Adsorptive theory

© 2024 chempedia.info