Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Activity coefficients formation

An overview of some basic mathematical techniques for data correlation is to be found herein together with background on several types of physical property correlating techniques and a road map for the use of selected methods. Methods are presented for the correlation of observed experimental data to physical properties such as critical properties, normal boiling point, molar volume, vapor pressure, heats of vaporization and fusion, heat capacity, surface tension, viscosity, thermal conductivity, acentric factor, flammability limits, enthalpy of formation, Gibbs energy, entropy, activity coefficients, Henry s constant, octanol—water partition coefficients, diffusion coefficients, virial coefficients, chemical reactivity, and toxicological parameters. [Pg.232]

In an attempt to explain the nature of polar interactions, Martire et al. [15] developed a theory assuming that such interactions could be explained by the formation of a complex between the solute and the stationary phase with its own equilibrium constant. Martire and Riedl adopted a procedure used by Danger et al. [16], and divided the solute activity coefficient into two components. [Pg.77]

It should, however, be noted that as the concentration of the excess of precipitant increases, so too does the ionic strength of the solution. This leads to a decrease in activity coefficient values with the result that to maintain the value of Ks more of the precipitate will dissolve. In other words there is a limit to the amount of precipitant which can be safely added in excess. Also, addition of excess precipitant may sometimes result in the formation of soluble complexes causing some precipitate to dissolve. [Pg.28]

Note that a number of complicating factors have been left out for clarity For instance, in the EMF equation, activities instead of concentrations should be used. Activities are related to concentrations by a multiplicative activity coefficient that itself is sensitive to the concentrations of all ions in the solution. The reference electrode necessary to close the circuit also generates a (diffusion) potential that is a complex function of activities and ion mobilities. Furthermore, the slope S of the electrode function is an experimentally determined parameter subject to error. The essential point, though, is that the DVM-clipped voltages appear in the exponent and that cheap equipment extracts a heavy price in terms of accuracy and precision (viz. quantization noise such an instrument typically displays the result in a 1 mV, 0.1 mV, 0.01 mV, or 0.001 mV format a two-decimal instrument clips a 345.678. .. mV result to 345.67 mV, that is it does not round up ... 78 to ... 8 ). [Pg.231]

For the homogalacturonan, the activity coefficient of sodium is 0.54 but that of calcium 0.12, in very dilute solution, indicating a dimer formation. The activity coefficient Y is directly imposed by X, with ... [Pg.27]

With different pectins, one found that the activity coefficient of calcium has a value half that of magnesium this is interpreted as the basis of a dimer formation in presence of calcium. The specific interaction of calcium was described as the egg-box model first proposed for polyguluronate in which oxygen atoms coordinated to calcium [46]. Recently, the comparative behaviour of Mg and Ca with homogalacturonan was reexamined [47]. [Pg.28]

For protonation-dehydration processes, such as trityl cation formation from triphenylcarbinols, equation (24), the water activity has to be included if the formulation of the activity coefficient ratio term is to be the same as that in equation (7), which it should be if linearity in X is to be expected see equation (25). The excess acidity expression in this case becomes equation (26) this is a slightly different formulation from that used previously for these processes,36 the one given here being more rigorous. Molarity-based water activities must be used, or else the standard states for all the species in equation (26) will not be the same, see above. For consistency this means that all values of p/fR listed in the literature will have to have 1.743 added to them, since at present the custom... [Pg.19]

A similar multiphase complication that should be kept in mind when discussing solutions at finite concentrations is possible micelle formation. It is well known that for many organic solutes in water, when the concentration exceeds a certain solute-dependent value, called the critical micelle concentration (cmc), the solute molecules are not distributed in a random uncorrelated way but rather aggregate into units (micelles) in which their distances of separation and orientations with respect to each other and to solvent molecules have strong correlations. Micelle formation, if it occurs, will clearly have a major effect on the apparent activity coefficient but the observation of the phenomenon requires more sophisticated analytical techniques than observation of, say, liquid-liquid phase separation. [Pg.79]

In the virial methods, therefore, the activity coefficients account implicitly for the reduction in the free ion s activity due to the formation of whatever ion pairs and complex species are not included in the formulation. As such, they describe not only the factors traditionally accounted for by activity coefficient models, such as the effects of electrostatic interaction and ion hydration, but also the distribution of species in solution. There is no provision in the method for separating the traditional part of the coefficients from the portion attributable to speciation. For this reason, the coefficients differ (even in the absence of error) in meaning and value from activity coefficients given by other methods. It might be more accurate and less confusing to refer to the virial methods as activity models rather than as activity coefficient models. [Pg.123]

The activities of the free ions remain roughly constant with NaCl concentration, and their concentrations increase only moderately, reflecting the decrease in the B-dot activity coefficients with increasing ionic strength (Fig. 8.3). Formation of the complex species CaCl+ and NaSOj drives the general increase in gypsum solubility with NaCl concentration predicted by the B-dot model. [Pg.133]

In the HMW model, in contrast, Ca++ and SO4 are the only calcium or sulfate-bearing species considered. The species maintain equal concentration, as required by electroneutrality, and mirror the solubility curve in Figure 8.6. Unlike the B-dot model, the species activities follow trends dissimilar to their concentrations. The Ca++ activity rises sharply while that of SO4 decreases. In this case, variation in gypsum solubility arises not from the formation of ion pairs, but from changes in the activity coefficients for Ca++ and SO4 as well as in the water activity. The latter value, according to the model, decreases with NaCl concentration from one to about 0.7. [Pg.133]

We could, of course, attempt more sophisticated simulations of scale formation. Since the fluid mixture is quite concentrated early in the mixing, we might use a virial model to calculate activity coefficients (see Chapter 8). The Harvie-Mpller-Weare (1984) activity model is limited to 25 °C and does not consider barium or... [Pg.441]

It may be noted that, since the distribution coefficient is smaller than unity, the solid phase becomes depleted in strontium relative to the concentration in the aqueous solution. The small value of D may be interpreted in terms of a high activity coefficient of strontium in the solid phase, /srco3 38. If the strontium were in equilibrium with strontianite, [Sr2+] 10 3-2 M, that is, its concentration would be more than six times larger than at saturation with Cao.996Sro.oo4C03(s). This is an illustration of the consequence of solid solution formation where with Xcaco3 /caC03 -1 ... [Pg.239]

If there is no agreement in calculated and observed solid-solution properties we can only conclude that equilibrium was not established. The validity of the provisional activity coefficients depends on the validity of the original assumption that stoichiometric saturation was established. If independent data for the standard free energy of formation of the solid... [Pg.564]

The effect of solution anionic concentration is probably related to effects on activity coefficients and ion pair formation of more highly charged buffer species. In more concentrated solutions, the activity of the highly charged species is reduced by both ionic strength and ion pair formation. The effect on less charged, acidic species is less. Therefore, as solutions become more concentrated, the activity of basic species is reduced relative to that of acidic species, and at a given fraction... [Pg.273]

We do not introduce activity coefficients in the present discussion (see Section V,B). The next assumption in the theory is that the formation of products is proportional to [X] and therefore to K. After an intricate mathematical derivation, the rate constant k of the reaction is obtained in the form... [Pg.97]

Let AT be the true thermodynamic equilibrium constant for formation of the transition-state species T from the reactant-state species R and let k be the experimental rate constant for the reaction of R. Neglecting activity coefficients ... [Pg.34]

Raji Heyrovska [18] has developed a model based on incomplete dissociation, Bjermm s theory of ion-pair formation, and hydration numbers that she has found fits the data for NaCl solutions from infinite dilution to saturation, as well as several other strong electrolytes. She describes the use of activity coefficients and extensions of the Debye-Hiickel theory as best-fitting parameters rather than as explaining the significance of the observed results. ... [Pg.464]

Here fM and fL are the activity coefficients of micelle and monomer. The free energy of micelle formation is, therefore,... [Pg.75]

On the other hand, micelle formation has sometimes been considered to be a phase separation of the surfactant-rich phase from the dilute aqueous solution of surfactant. The micellar phase and the monomer in solution are regarded to be in phase equilibrium and cmc can be considered to be the solubility of the surfactant. When the activity coefficient of the monomer is assumed to be unity, the free energy of micelle formation, Ag, is calculated by an equation... [Pg.75]

From the formation reaction of protonic defects in oxides (eq 23), it is evident that protonic defects coexist with oxide ion vacancies, where the ratio of their concentrations is dependent on temperature and water partial pressure. The formation of protonic defects actually requires the uptake of water from the environment and the transport of water within the oxide lattice. Of course, water does not diffuse as such, but rather, as a result of the ambipolar diffusion of protonic defects (OH and oxide ion vacancies (V ). Assuming ideal behavior of the involved defects (an activity coefficient of unity) the chemical (Tick s) diffusion coefficient of water is... [Pg.426]

It can be shown that the virial type of activity coefficient equations and the ionic pairing model are equivalent, provided that the ionic pairing is weak. In these cases, it is in general difficult to distinguish between complex formation and activity coefficient variations unless independent experimental evidence for complex formation is available, e.g., from spectroscopic data, as is the case for the weak uranium(VI) chloride complexes. It should be noted that the ion interaction coefficients evaluated and tabulated by Cia-vatta [10] were obtained from experimental mean activity coefficient data without taking into account complex formation. However, it is known that many of the metal ions listed by Ciavatta form weak complexes with chloride and nitrate ions. This fact is reflected by ion interaction coefficients that are smaller than those for the noncomplexing perchlorate ion (see Table 6.3). This review takes chloride and nitrate complex formation into account when these ions are part of the ionic medium and uses the value of the ion interaction coefficient (m +,cio4) for (M +,ci ) (m +,noj)- Io... [Pg.277]

To be able to interpret these results and to correct for the lower calcium concentrations at high sulfate and phosphate concentrations, the partition coefficients D have been determined. These values follow from the slopes of the curves in figure 7. For 5.5 and 6.0 M HjPO a D of about 1.5 10" is obtained. A similar D-value for both acid concentrations should indeed be obtained, when the activity coefficients of the ions in solution is not strongly affected by the acid concentration. The D-value for 6.5 M H PO lies somewhat higher. This could e.g. be caused by a higher activity coefficient of cadmium compared to calcium at this acid concentration. The thermodynamic D-value cannot be determined by increasing the residence time, because a residence time of 2400 seconds already caused anhydrite formation. [Pg.388]


See other pages where Activity coefficients formation is mentioned: [Pg.490]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.1108]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.233]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Formate, active

Formate, active activation

© 2024 chempedia.info