Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Best fits parameters

Fitting Results for Lewis Acid Complex Formation (a) Best fit parameter... [Pg.520]

The adsorption isotherms for each chemical, Triton X-100 or phenanthrene, on the activated carbons were shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The adsorption isotherms are expressed as qg [g g ], the amount of compounds adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent, as a fimction of Q [g l ], the concentration in solution at equilibrium [5, 6]. The best-fit parameters for Freimdlich isotherms (g = or linear isotherms (q - Kj C ) were summarized in Table 2. The... [Pg.462]

Figure 10. Comparison of the critical-capillary-pressure data of Khatib, Hirasaki and Falls (5) (darkened circles) to the proposed dynamic foam stability theory (solid line). Best fitting parameters for the constant-charge electrostatic model are listed. Figure 10. Comparison of the critical-capillary-pressure data of Khatib, Hirasaki and Falls (5) (darkened circles) to the proposed dynamic foam stability theory (solid line). Best fitting parameters for the constant-charge electrostatic model are listed.
Fig. 2. Spectral changes of la (2.75 x 10-4M) in the presence of pyridine 0.1 M KPF6, pH 6.3 and 25°C. Inset Absorbance at 360 nm as a function of [py] solid line is calculated curve using best-fit parameters of Eq. (2) broken line is a calculated curve with K2l = 0 validating binding of the second axial ligand. From Ref. (27). Fig. 2. Spectral changes of la (2.75 x 10-4M) in the presence of pyridine 0.1 M KPF6, pH 6.3 and 25°C. Inset Absorbance at 360 nm as a function of [py] solid line is calculated curve using best-fit parameters of Eq. (2) broken line is a calculated curve with K2l = 0 validating binding of the second axial ligand. From Ref. (27).
Table 6.1 shows some other best-fit parameters to Solar-System s-process abundances. The seed nucleus is basically 56Fe light nuclei have low cross-sections (but can act as neutron poisons , e.g. 14N for the 13C(a, n) neutron source), whereas heavier nuclei are not abundant enough to have a major influence. Certain nuclidic ratios, e.g. 37Cl/36Ar and 41K/40Ca, indicate that under 1 per cent of Solar-System material has been s-processed. [Pg.211]

The information in Figure 14 was produced in the following way. The slope (or the Kurbatov coefficients shown in Table V) and position of the fractional absorption gdges in Figure 3 were used as the criteria of model fit. Kcd an< CdOH were used as the fitting parameters and all other parameters were held constant. Consequently, the intrinsic constants shown in Figure 14a represent best fit parameters and, given that all other surface and solution association constants are invariant, constitute a unique solution set for each adsorption density. [Pg.183]

Once the best fit parameters are obtained, the quality of the fitted decay function must be judged using statistical and graphical criteria. [Pg.183]

Best-fit parameters for the earlier FPA and TPD data(59,62) are in reasonable accord, but differ significantly from those for the most recent FPA experiments.(235) For the TPD data,(62) a must be at least 2.5 times smaller than that of the free DNA, provided y is not smaller than for free DNA in solution/63 Assuming only that one or both ends of the mobile region are clamped to the core particle, Genest et a/.<5<>> concluded that a is reduced by... [Pg.212]

Raji Heyrovska [18] has developed a model based on incomplete dissociation, Bjermm s theory of ion-pair formation, and hydration numbers that she has found fits the data for NaCl solutions from infinite dilution to saturation, as well as several other strong electrolytes. She describes the use of activity coefficients and extensions of the Debye-Hiickel theory as best-fitting parameters rather than as explaining the significance of the observed results. ... [Pg.464]

In copper(II) systems, a small (10-15%) -anisotropy is always present. Calculations show that such modest -anisotropy has negligible effect on the dispersion curves, thus affecting the resulting best fit parameters only... [Pg.152]

The NMRD profile of the protein adduct shows a largely increased relaxivity, with the dispersion moved at about 1 MHz and a relaxivity peak in the high field region. This shape is clearly related to the fact that the field dependent electron relaxation time is now the correlation time for proton relaxation even at low fields. The difference in relaxivities before and after the dispersion is in this case very small, and therefore the profile cannot be well fit with the SBM theory, and the presence of a small static ZFS must be taken into account 103). The best fit parameters obtained with the Florence NMRD program are D = 0.01 cm , A = 0.017 cm , t = 18x10 s, and xji =0.56 X 10 s. Such values are clearly in agreement with those obtained with fast-motion theory 101). [Pg.163]

Best-Fit Parameter Values Corresponding to the Solid Lines in Figure 1.13... [Pg.24]

Once the best-fit parameters are obtained, the distribution of relaxation times or, equivalently, barrier heights may be easily computed from Equation (1.16). The distribution function corresponding to the data in Figure 1.13 is plotted for the two types of measurements in Figure 1.14. [Pg.24]

FIGURE 1.13 Experimental results (points) obtained from pump-probe (left) and transient phase grating (right) measurements of MbCO recombination as a function of time, t, following photodissociation. Solid lines were computed from equations (26) and (27), and the best-fit parameter values are listed in Table 1.2. (From Walther, M., Raicu, V., Ogilvie, J. R, Phillips, R., Kluger, R., and Miller, R. J. D. 2005. J. Phys. Chem. B 109 20605-11. With permission.)... [Pg.25]

Best-Fit Parameters Obtained from Simulations of the Data in Figure 1.15 with the SRC Model [Equation (1.32)]... [Pg.27]

It should be said that only since Cowan and Fickett s report have good experimental detonation pressure data been available for use in arriving at best-fit parameters. Also, the covolume factors (ki) have been deliberately normalized but not set equal to molecular excluded volumes. In this normalization, rather cogent argu-... [Pg.2]

Best-Fit Parameters, Measure of Fit to the Liquidus Line, and Calculated InSb-Sb Eutectic for the In-Sb System ... [Pg.199]

Fig. 13. Fitting the frequency dependence of the EPR line width of MS-325 in HEPES buffer at 23°C, making use of Eq. (9). Best fit parameters obtained from the data are A2 = 7.3 XlO19 rad2/s2 rv = 2.9XlO-11 s R0 = 1.7xl08s 1... Fig. 13. Fitting the frequency dependence of the EPR line width of MS-325 in HEPES buffer at 23°C, making use of Eq. (9). Best fit parameters obtained from the data are A2 = 7.3 XlO19 rad2/s2 rv = 2.9XlO-11 s R0 = 1.7xl08s 1...
Here too, we will minimize X2 to find the best fit parameters. We repeat the above procedure until X2 stops decreasing. [Pg.370]


See other pages where Best fits parameters is mentioned: [Pg.512]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.1137]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.310 ]




SEARCH



Fitted parameters

Parameters, fitting

© 2024 chempedia.info