Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Activation, catalyst coking

Air and spent catalyst distribution. Modifications to the air and spent catalyst distributors permit uniform dispersion of air and spent catalyst into the regenerator. Improvements are lower carbon on the catalyst and less catalyst sintering. The benefits are a cleaner and higher-activity catalyst, which results in more liquid products and less coke and gas. [Pg.203]

In contrast to the Pt catalysts discussed above, Ni based catalysts (i.e., also when supported on ZrO usually form coke at such a rapid rate that most fixed bed reactors are completely blocked after a few minutes time on stream (see Fig. 8) [16], The coke formed with the Ni catalysts is filamentous. The Ni particle remaining at the tip of the filament hardly deactivates as the coke formed on its surface seems to be transported through the metal particle into the carbon fibre, but the drastic increase in volume causes reactor plugging and prevents use of the still active catalyst (see Fig. 8). The TEM photographs indicate that the carbon filaments have similar diameters to those of the Ni particles. [Pg.471]

Combifining A petroleum refining process which removes asphaltenes, sulfur, and metals from residues, before further treatment. The catalyst is an activated petroleum coke in a fluidized bed, operated under hydrogen pressure at 380 to 420°C. [Pg.70]

U.S. producers of, 4 748t Activated carbon adsorption, as advanced wastewater treatment, 25 909 Activated catalyst layer, 70 40-42 Activated charcoal, 73 461 Activated coke, for SO and NO removal, 77 720... [Pg.14]

Generally speaking, resid FCC (RFCC) catalysts should be very effective in bottoms cracking, be metals tolerant, and coke and dry gas selective. Based on many years of fundamental research and industrial experiences, a series of RFCC catalysts, such as Orbit, DVR, and MLC, have been developed by the SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing (RIPP) and successfully commercialized [1]. These catalysts are very effective in paraffinic residue cracking. However, in recent years more and more intermediate-based residue has been introduced into FCC units, and the performances of conventional RFCC catalysts are now unsatisfactory. Therefore, novel zeolites and matrices have been developed to formulate a new generation of RFCC catalysts with improved bottoms cracking activity and coke selectivity. [Pg.78]

To improve bottoms cracking activity and coke selectivity of RFCC catalysts, novel zeolites and matrices have been developed recently. Commercial results showed that both VRCC-1 catalyst containing SOY zeolite and RSC-2006 based on silica modified alumina matrix have demonstrated excellent bottoms cracking capability and... [Pg.89]

Measurement of heat of adsorption by means of microcalorimetry has been used extensively in heterogeneous catalysis to gain more insight into the strength of gas-surface interactions and the catalytic properties of solid surfaces [61-65]. Microcalorimetry coupled with volumetry is undoubtedly the most reliable method, for two main reasons (i) the expected physical quantities (the heat evolved and the amount of adsorbed substance) are directly measured (ii) no hypotheses on the actual equilibrium of the system are needed. Moreover, besides the provided heat effects, adsorption microcalorimetry can contribute in the study of all phenomena, which can be involved in one catalyzed process (activation/deactivation of the catalyst, coke production, pore blocking, sintering, and adsorption of poisons in the feed gases) [66]. [Pg.202]

Fig. 6 Schematic drawing of ZSM5 catalyst bed deactivation. View of the fused silica reaction tube at about 40 % of catalyst life time. Black zone (I) of deactivated catalyst particles covered with coke ("methanol coke"). Small dark reaction zone (II) in which methanol conversion to 100 % occurs. Blue/grey zone (III) of active catalyst on which a small amount of "olefin coke" produced by the olefinic hydrocarbon product mixture has been deposited on the crystallite surfaces. The quartz particles before and behind the catalyst bed (zones 0) remain essentially white. Fig. 6 Schematic drawing of ZSM5 catalyst bed deactivation. View of the fused silica reaction tube at about 40 % of catalyst life time. Black zone (I) of deactivated catalyst particles covered with coke ("methanol coke"). Small dark reaction zone (II) in which methanol conversion to 100 % occurs. Blue/grey zone (III) of active catalyst on which a small amount of "olefin coke" produced by the olefinic hydrocarbon product mixture has been deposited on the crystallite surfaces. The quartz particles before and behind the catalyst bed (zones 0) remain essentially white.
Promoters are added to Pt catalysts because the promoted catalyst with modified electronic properties leads to a decrease in the activity for coke formation and also in the rate of metal sintering. Several promoted systems have been reported in the literature including for environmnetal pollution (vehicle exhaust emission) control and some are summarized here. [Pg.200]

The major results of this study are consistent with a simple picture of mordenite catalysts. An increase in effective pore diameter, whether by extraction or exchange, will increase the rate of transport of reactant and product molecules to and from the active sites. However, aluminum ions are necessary for catalytic activity as aluminum is progressively removed by acid extraction, the number of active sites and the initial activity decrease. Coke deposition is harmful in two ways coke formation as the reaction proceeds will cause a decrease in effective pore diameter and effective diffusivity, and coke deposited on active sites will result in a chemical deactivation as well. [Pg.600]

Coke Deposition. The properties of catalyst fractions separated in coked condition from spent equilibrium catalyst are summarized in Tables III and IV. The distribution of catalyst fractions along with the percent carbon found on each coked fraction is given in Figure 2. The activity for coke deposition falls off sharply with increase in density. Only the three lightest fractions show a coke make that is significantly above the minimum coke make exhibited by the heavier fractions. The fact that the lightest fractions are the most active is consistent with the notion that they are the youngest. The distribution of catalyst... [Pg.119]

The analytical data on separated catalyst fractions given in Tables III, IV, VI, and VII can be used to estimate the contribution to catalyst density change from 1) decreased activity for coke deposition, 2) increasing metals deposition, and 3) excluded volume associated with both the small and large zeolite cages. [Pg.144]

While most catalyst vendors rely on fixed bed microactivity (MAT) tests, fixed fluid bed (FFB) reactor experiments are widely used within Mobil to characterize FCC catalysts. The amount of catalyst used is constant for each test, and products are collected for a known period of time. In MAT experiments, catalyst bed is fixed while in FFB test the catalyst bed is fluidized. As products are collected over the decay cycle of the catalyst, the resulting conversion and coke yields are strongly influenced by catalyst deactivation. Systematic differences exist between the measured conversion or catalyst activity and coke yields for the MAT and FFB tests. The magnitude of these differences varies depending on the type of catalyst being tested (REY or USY). Experimental data in Figure 1 clearly show that FFB conversion is higher than MAT conversion for USY catalysts. On the other hand, FFB conversion is lower than MAT conversion for REY catalysts. Furthermore, the quantitative... [Pg.149]

REY Catalysts. REY catalysts always give lower FFB conversions than MAT conversions (Figure 1). To simulate the observed conversion differences in the MAT and FFB units for REY catalysts, the intrinsic cracking activity kj is increased at constant coking activity Aj. This choice of parameters is a first order approximation for the activity and coke-conversion selectivity variation of equilibrium catalysts. Parameters summarized in Table V are used as the initial starting point. [Pg.159]


See other pages where Activation, catalyst coking is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.1572]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.832]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.44]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 , Pg.92 , Pg.93 , Pg.94 , Pg.95 , Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



Activated coke

Active coke

Catalysts catalyst coking

Catalysts coke

Coked catalyst

Predicted coke-conversion selectivity catalyst activity

© 2024 chempedia.info