Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Weight correction

Figure 9-23. Weight correction for a back-propagation network. Figure 9-23. Weight correction for a back-propagation network.
Step 3. Refer to Figure 4-7 and select an efficiency at a pressure ratio of 3 and a volume ratio, r of 2.44. The adiabatic efficiency is 74%. Now, from Figure 4-5, select a value of efficiency ratio using the tip speed ratio just calculated. Because the value is. 99+, round off to an even 1.0. With a multiplier of 1.0, the final adiabatic efficiency is the value read directly off the curve or T a = 74. The molecular weight correction for efficiency, per rule of thumb, is 0.6 for a final efficiency of 73.4. [Pg.105]

The results are expressed in dB(A). The suffix (A) means that the new level has been calculated referring to the A-weighting correction. Phonometers have a special filter called the A-filter, which automatically introduces this correction at measured values, allowing the reading of pressure level in dB(A) directly. [Pg.797]

HARDNESS.dat Section 4.9 One-hundred-twenty tablets were taken off a press in the order they emerged, and hardness and weight were individually determined one column features the stamp number (cf. STAMP.dat) another column gives the weight-corrected hardness values. N = 120, M = 5 use with programs LINREG, XYZ, and XYZCELL. [Pg.389]

Repeat this process for all input patterns. One iteration or epoch is defined as one weight correction for all examples of the training set. [Pg.673]

Hence, the expression used to calculate Molecular weight corrected for non-ideal behaviour as also for asymmetric scattering will be... [Pg.119]

When this is done, the molecular weight corrected for dissymmetry, Md, is given by... [Pg.179]

Mineral standards were hand crushed to -1/4 inch, then ground to a fine powder in a ball mill (alumina elements) or Bleuler Model 526/LFS678 puck mill. The resultant powder was aerodynamically classified in a Bahco Model 6000 micro particle classifier and the finest fraction ( 18 throttle) was collected. A size criterion of 90% or more by weight of particles 5 micron and smaller in diameter was used for the mineral standards. Sizes were verified by Coulter Counter. Duplicate 13 mm KBr pellets were prepared and the spectra were weight-scaled by techniques similar to those reported by Painter (3) and Elliot (4). With one exception, all the mineral standard spectra were averages of spectra from duplicate pellets. The one exception was the iron sulfate spectrum, which was obtained as the difference spectrum by subtracting the spectrum of HCl-washed weathered pyrite from that of the weathered pyrite. A weight correction was applied to the difference spectrum. [Pg.46]

In order to account for differences in metabolic rates between experimental animals and humans, a surface area to body weight correction (Section 5.3.2.2) is sometimes applied to quantitative estimates of cancer risk derived by low-dose extrapolation. The WHO stated that incorporation of this factor increases the risk by approximately one order of magnitude, depending on the species upon which the estimate is based, and increases the risk estimated on the basis of studies in mice relative to that in rats. The WHO considered incorporation of this factor to be overly conservative, particularly in view of the fact that linear extrapolation more likely overestimates risk at low doses. Therefore, the guideline values for carcinogens were developed on the basis of quantitative estimates of risk that were not corrected for the ratio of surface area to body weight. [Pg.306]

C.K. Kim, N.C. Gupta, B. Chandramouli, A. Alavi, Standardized uptake values of FDG Body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction, J. Nucl. Med. 35(1) (1994) 164-167. [Pg.188]

Weighing the gravid uterus is not mandatory for all regulatory guidelines, but the information gained with respect to maternal body weight corrected for uterine weight provides a very useful aid to data interpretation. After removal of the fetuses and placentae, the uterus of all females is placed in ammonium sulfide solution in order to stain any previously undetected implantation sites (15). [Pg.116]

ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder EKG, electrocardiogram GI, gastrointestinal MD, major depression MR, mental retardation OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder. Trade names are in parentheses. Doses are general guidelines. All doses must be individualized with appropriate monitoring. Weight-corrected doses are less appropriate for obese children. [Pg.451]

Cohen et al. (1999) reported an absence of a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between DMI and stimulants in children. In their study, 403 serum concentrations from 142 subjects were examined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for both the DMI and DMI + stimulant groups, including the mean weight-corrected dose (mg/kg), weight and dose-normalized DMI serum concentrations [( ig/L)/ mg/kg], and DMI clearance (L/kg)/hr. [Pg.457]

Radioiodine therapy utilizing 1311 is the preferred treatment for most patients over 21 years of age. In patients without heart disease, the therapeutic dose may be given immediately in a range of 80-120 M3i/g of estimated thyroid weight corrected for uptake. In patients with underlying heart disease or severe thyrotoxicosis and in elderly patients, it is desirable to treat with antithyroid drugs (preferably methimazole) until the patient is euthyroid. The medication is then stopped for 5-7 days before... [Pg.868]

Compare the results of stratified in-process dosage unit analysis with uniform content of the finished dosage units from the previous step. This analysis should be done without weight correction. [Pg.33]

If either of the above two criteria apply, use the weight corrected results from the stage 2 SCM analysis and compare this with the MCM criteria ... [Pg.35]

Pollutants Molecular weight Corrected dark adsorption (molecule/cm )... [Pg.257]

Figure 4. Mark-Houwink data with molecular weights corrected to 0% sodium... Figure 4. Mark-Houwink data with molecular weights corrected to 0% sodium...
The concentration calculated above is on the sample "as is" and not as dry weight corrected. Concentration on a dry weight basis may be calculated by dividing the above result with the percent total sohd expressed in decimal. [Pg.38]

Cracking reactions were duplicated and the results were averaged. In all cases, mass balances were in the range 98.0-100.5% and results were normalised to 100% using a feed weight correction. [Pg.63]


See other pages where Weight correction is mentioned: [Pg.457]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.798]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.939]    [Pg.939]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.1851]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.1259]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.205]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.479 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 ]




SEARCH



Correct condition weight

Polymolecularity correction factors weight relationship

© 2024 chempedia.info