Vapor cloud explosions result

Investigate the potential for unconfmed vapor cloud explosions resulting from accidents at the flammable storage tank area. 

Vapor cloud explosion resulting from release of flammable vapor. 

An unconfined vapor cloud explosion results from the release of a considerable quantity of flammable gas, or vapor, into the atmosphere, and its subsequent ignition. 

Many types of outcomes are possible for a release. This includes vapor cloud explosions (VCE) (Section 3.1), flash fires (Section 3.2), physical explosions (Section 3.3), boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions (BLEVE) and fireballs (Section 3.4), confined explosions (Section 3.5), and pool fires and jet fires (Section 3.6). Figure 3.1 provides a basis for logically describing accidental explosion and fire scenarios. The output of the bottom of this diagram are various incident outcomes with particular eflfects (e.g., vapor cloud explosion resulting in a shock wave). 

A Phillips high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plant suffered a maintenance error that led to total loss of reactor inventory, causing a vapor cloud explosion resulting in 23 fatalities and 130 injuries. Loss estimated at 1.4billion. See Figure 6.2. 

A BP refinery overfilled an Isomerization process vessel that subsequently released flammable vapors and liquids from a vent stack that caused a major vapor cloud explosion, resulting in 15 fatalities and 170 injured. 

Vapor cloud explosions. Explosions which occur in the open air are vapor cloud explosions. A vapor cloud explosion is one of the most serious hazards in the process industries. Although a large toxic release may have a greater disaster potential, vapor cloud explosions tend to occur more frequently. Most vapor cloud explosions have been the result of leaks of flashing flammable liquids. 

Vapor cloud explosions can result if clouds of flammable vapor in air are formed. It is important to understand how hquids and gases flow through holes in equipment and how resulting vapor or gas clouds are dispersed in air. 

Davenport [1] has listed more than 60 major leaks of flammable materials, most of which resulted in serious fires or unconfined vapor cloud explosions. Table 9-1, derived from his data, classifies the leak by point of origin and shows that pipe failures accounted for half the failures— more than half if we exclude transport containers. It is therefore important to know why pipe failures occur. Following, a number of typical failures (or near failures) are discussed. These and other failures, summarized in References 2 and 3, show that by far the biggest single cause of pipe failures has been the failure of construction teams to follow instructions or to do well what was left to their discretion. The most effective way of reducing pipe failures is to ... 

Accidents involving fire have occurred ever since man began to use flammable liquids or gases as fuels. Summaries of such accidents are given by Davenport (1977), Strehlow and Baker (1976), Lees (1980), and Lenoir and Davenport (1993). The presence of flammable gases or liquids can result in a BLEVE or flash fire or, if sufficient fuel is available, a vapor cloud explosion. 

Ufa, Weat-SIberla, USSR Pipeline Rupture Resulting In Vapor Cloud Explosion... 

These results were analytically reproduced by Taylor (1985), who employed a velocity potential function for a convected monopole. This concept makes it possible to model an elongated vapor cloud explosion by one single volume source which is convected along the main axis at burning velocity, and whose strength varies proportionally to the local cross-sectional cloud area. 

In general, discontinuities constitute a problem for numerical methods. Numerical simulation of a blast flow field by conventional, finite-difference schemes results in a solution that becomes increasingly inaccurate. To overcome such problems and to achieve a proper description of gas dynamic discontinuities, extra computational effort is required. Two approaches to this problem are found in the literature on vapor cloud explosions. These approaches differ mainly in the way in which the extra computational effort is spent. 

The major mechanism of a vapor cloud explosion, the feedback in the interaction of combustion, flow, and turbulence, can be readily found in this mathematical model. The combustion rate, which is primarily determined by the turbulence properties, is a source term in the conservation equation for the fuel-mass fraction. The attendant energy release results in a distribution of internal energy which is described by the equation for conservation of energy. This internal energy distribution is translated into a pressure field which drives the flow field through momentum equations. The flow field acts as source term in the turbulence model, which results in a turbulent-flow structure. Finally, the turbulence properties, together with the composition, determine the rate of combustion. This completes the circle, the feedback in the process of turbulent, premixed combustion in gas explosions. The set of equations has been solved with various numerical methods e.g., SIMPLE (Patankar 1980) SOLA-ICE (Cloutman et al. 1976). 

The long list of vapor cloud explosion incidents indicates that the presence of a quantity of fuel constitutes a potential explosion hazard. If a quantity of flammable material is released, it will mix with air, and a flammable vapor cloud may result. If... 

Blast effects can be represented by a number of blast models. Generally, blast effects from vapor cloud explosions are directional. Such effects, however, cannot be modeled without conducting detailed numerical simulations of phenomena. If simplifying assumptions are made, that is, the idealized, symmetrical representation of blast effects, the computational burden is eased. An idealized gas-explosion blast model was generated by computation results are represented in Figure 4.24. Steady flame-speed gas explosions were numerically simulated with the BLAST-code (Van den Berg 1980), and their blast effects were calculated. 

If, on the other hand, a vapor cloud s explosive potential is the starting point for, say, advanced design of blast-resistant structures, TNT blast may be a less than satisfactory model. In such cases, the blast wave s shape and positive-phase duration must be considered important parameters, so the use of a more realistic blast model may be required. A fuel-air charge blast model developed through the multienergy concept, as suggested by Van den Berg (1985), results in a more realistic representation of a vapor cloud explosion blast. 

Stock, M., and W. Geiger. 1984. Assessment of vapor cloud explosion hazards based on recent research results. 9th Int. Symp. on the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases in the Chemical Industry, Luzern, Switzerland. 

A flash fire is the nonexplosive combustion of a vapor cloud resulting from a release of flammable material into the open air, which, after mixing with air, ignites. In Section 4.1, experiments on vapor cloud explosions were reviewed. They showed that combustion in a vapor cloud develops an explosive intensity and attendant blast effects only in areas where intensely turbulent combustion develops and only if certain conditions are met. Where these conditions are not present, no blast should occur. The cloud then bums as a flash fire, and its major hazard is from the effect of heat from thermal radiation. 

A vessel filled with a pressurized, superheated liquid can produce blasts upon bursting in three ways. First, the vapor that is usually present above the liquid can generate a blast, as from a gas-filled vessel. Second, the liquid will boil upon depressurization, and, if rapid boiling occurs, a blast wiU result. Third, if the fluid is combustible and the BLEVE is not fire induced, a vapor cloud explosion may occur (see Section 4.3.3.). In this subsection, only the first and second types of blast wiU be investigated. 

As described in Section 6.2.1., British Gas performed full-scale tests with LPG BLEVEs similar to those conducted by BASF. The experimenters measured very low overpressures firom the evaporating liquid, followed by a shock that was probably the so-called second shock, and by the pressure wave from the vapor cloud explosion (see Figure 6.6). The pressure wave firom the vapor cloud explosion probably resulted from experimental procedures involving ignition of the release. The liquid was below the superheat limit temperature at time of burst. 

Quantify the explosive potential of a vapor cloud which results firom the postulated propane release, and calculate the potential blast effects. Because it is dense, the flammable propane-air cloud spreads in a thin layer and covers a substantial area, including the tank farm and paiking lot. An overview of the tank farm site is given by the map in Figure 7.3b. 

The earliest tables were compiled from data collected from nuclear weapon tests, in which very high yield devices produced sharp-peaked shock waves with long durations for the positive phase. However, these data are used for other types of blast waves as well. Caution should be exercised in application of these simple criteria to buildings or structures, especially for vapor cloud explosions, which can produce blast waves with totally different shapes. Application of criteria from nuclear tests can, in many cases, result in overestimation of structural damage. 

Vapor cloud explosion The explosion resulting from the ignition of a cloud of flammable vapor, gas, or mist in which flame speeds accelerate to sufficiently high velocities to produce significant overpressure. 

Fire is more likely tlian an explosion where tliere is a loss of contaimiient of a flammable material from a railroad car, barge, ship tank, or from a pipeline. However, both unconfmed vapor cloud explosions (UVCES) and boiling liquid-e.xpanding vapor e.xplosions (BEEVES) can occur as a result of transport accidents, (see Section 7.5)... 

Ref. [40] points out that the effects of a Bleve depends on whether the liquid in the vessel is flammable. The initial explosion may generate a blast wave and fragments from the vessel. For a flammable material, the conditions described in Ref. [34] above may result, and even a vapor cloud explosion may result. 

---