Precision validation

Is this vision effectively and correctly transformed into design criteria for the formal representation of a curriculum (are the criteria valid, precise and complete transformation 1) ... 

If followed in experimenrtally accessible dilute solutions, Henry s law would be manifested as a horizontal asymptote in a plot such as Figure 19.3 as the square of the molality ratio goes to zero. We do not observe such an asymptote. Thus, the modified form of Henry s law is not followed over the concentration range that has been examined. However, the ratio of activity to the square of the molality ratio does extrapolate to 1, so that the data does satisfy the definition of activity [Equations (16.1) and (16.2)]. Thus, the activity clearly becomes equal to the square of the molality ratio in the limit of infinite dilution. Henry s law is a limiting law, which is valid precisely at infinite dilution, as expressed in Equation (16.19). No reliable extrapolation of the curve in Figure 19.2 exists to a hypothetical unit molality ratio standard state, but as we have a finite limiting slope at = 0, we can use... 

Note that in cases where the large n assumption is not valid, precise form and structure factors should be generated by performing the summations numerically. 

Validation. Precision ranged from 1.7 to 1.9% RSD and errors in recovery analyses of spiked samples were 0.81 and 0%. 

The paraquat ELISA developed in our laboratory started with the synthesis of the valeric acid derivative of paraquat (I) as hapten, and took well over one man-year to develop(7) (Figure 1). It is a very good method with fractional nanogram/mL sensitivity and (once fully validated) precision slightly better than the GC method. It is applicable to air filters, clothing patches, and hand washes, and showed promise for lymph and plasma analysis. The sample throughput was greater than GC and the method could be picked up rapidly by persons not skilled in the art. (Novices frequently pick up IA much faster than veteran analysts with a history of GC and HPLC experience ). 

Key words Measurement uncertainty Method validation Precision Trueness Ruggedness testing... 

Precision, which quantifies the variation between replicated measurements on test portions from the same sample material, is also an important consideration in determining when a residue in a sample should be considered to exceed a MRL or other regulatory action limit. Precision of a method is usually expressed in terms of the within-laboratory variation (repeatability) and the between-laboratory variability (reproducibility) when the method has been subjected to a multi-laboratory trial. For a single-laboratory method validation, precision should be determined from experiments conducted on different days, using a minimum of six different tissue pools, different reagent batches, preferably different equipment, and so on, and preferably by different analysts Repeatability of results when determined within a single laboratory but based on results from multiple analysts is termed intermediate precision Precision of a method is usually expressed as the standard deviation. Another useful term is relative standard deviation, or coefficient of variation (the standard deviation divided by the absolute value of the arithmetic mean result, multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage). 

The accuracy of a method can be evaluated by comparison of the results of a desirable method with results of validate/precise method. Among various NMR and IR techniques, H NMR spectroscopy can be considered as a precise and reliable one. This is due to the fact that it is the most sensitive and precise method and results in the least variation of experimental results as well as the most accurate data. It is desirable to take into consideration the following major parameters for quantitative analysis time of measurement precision of method and accuracy of results. In this way, H NMR is the best one for quantitative evaluation. 

B. Method validation includes studies of precision and accuracy of a proposed method. How would you validate precision and accuracy (Hint Review Section 5-1.)... 

Natural gas analysis has considerable economic importance. In fact, commercial contracts increasingly specify not just volume but the calorific or heating value as well. Today the calorific value of a natural gas calculated from its composition obtained by chromatography is recognized as valid. There is therefore a large research effort devoted to increasing the precision of this analysis. 

The results obtained with the two methods confirm the measured data with a good precision, with less computational time for the specialised code than the general code. This validation on three representative test bloeks can lead to many applications of modelling of the thin-skin regime. 

It is important to recognize that thennodynamic laws are generalizations of experimental observations on systems of macroscopic size for such bulk systems the equations are exact (at least within the limits of the best experimental precision). The validity and applicability of the relations are independent of the correchiess of any model of molecular behaviour adduced to explain them. Moreover, the usefiilness of thennodynamic relations depends cmcially on measurability, unless an experimenter can keep the constraints on a system and its surroundings under control, the measurements may be worthless. 

The raw data collected during the experiment are then analyzed. Frequently the data must be reduced or transformed to a more readily analyzable form. A statistical treatment of the data is used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the analysis and to validate the procedure. These results are compared with the criteria established during the design of the experiment, and then the design is reconsidered, additional experimental trials are run, or a solution to the problem is proposed. When a solution is proposed, the results are subject to an external evaluation that may result in a new problem and the beginning of a new analytical cycle. 

Before a procedure can provide useful analytical information, it is necessary to demonstrate that it is capable of providing acceptable results. Validation is an evaluation of whether the precision and accuracy obtained by following the procedure are appropriate for the problem. In addition, validation ensures that the written procedure has sufficient detail so that different analysts or laboratories following the same procedure obtain comparable results. Ideally, validation uses a standard sample whose composition closely matches the samples for which the procedure was developed. The comparison of replicate analyses can be used to evaluate the procedure s precision and accuracy. Intralaboratory and interlaboratory differences in the procedure also can be evaluated. In the absence of appropriate standards, accuracy can be evaluated by comparing results obtained with a new method to those obtained using a method of known accuracy. Chapter 14 provides a more detailed discussion of validation techniques. 

Numerous examples of standard methods have been presented and discussed in the preceding six chapters. What we have yet to consider, however, is what constitutes a standard method. In this chapter we consider how a standard method is developed, including optimizing the experimental procedure, verifying that the method produces acceptable precision and accuracy in the hands of a single analyst, and validating the method for general use. 

The last step in establishing a standard method is to validate its transferability to other laboratories. An important step in the process of validating a method is collaborative testing, in which a common set of samples is analyzed by different laboratories. In a well-designed collaborative test, it is possible to establish limits for the method s precision and accuracy. 

A simple, rapid, precise and economical High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic (HPTLC) method has been developed and validated for determination of Alprazolam and Melatonine in its pharmaceutical preparation. It was performed on silica gel 60 Thin Layer... 

The method was validated in accordance to the guidelines of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Data with respect to accuracy, within- and between run precision, recovery, detection and quantitation limits were reported and found to be within the accepted international criteria. Neither endogeneous substances nor the commonly used dmgs were found to interfere with the retention times of the analytes. Standard solutions of the dmg and quality control preparations at high and low level concentrations were demonstrated to be stable at room temperature and/or -20°C for long and short periods of time. 

The models you use to portray failures that lead to accidents, and the models you use to propagate their effects, are attempts to approximate reality. Models of accident sequences (although mathematically rigorous) cannot be demonstrated to be exact because you can never precisely identify all of the factors that contribute to an accident of interest. Likewise, most consequence models are at best correlations derived from limited experimental evidence. Even if the models are validated through field experiments for some specific situations, you can never validate them for all possibilities, and the question of model appropriateness will always exist. 

The absolute precision of ERS therefore depends on that of da/dfl (Ej, (t>). Unfortunately, some disagreement prevails among measurements of the recoil cross section. One recent determination is shown in Figure 4a for (t> = 30° and 25°. The convergence of these data with the Rutherford cross section near 1 MeV lends support to their validity. The solid lines are least squares fits to the polynomial form used by Tirira et al.. For (t> = 30°, the expression reads ... 

The chromatography literature contains a vast amount of dispersion data for all types of chromatography and, in particular, much of the data pertains directly to GC and LC. Unfortunately, almost all the data is unsuitable for validating one particular dispersion equation as opposed to another. There are a number of reasons for this firstly, the necessary supporting data (e.g., diffusivity data for the solutes in the solvents employed as the mobile phase, accurate distribution and/or capacity factor constants (k")) are not available secondly, the accuracy and precision of much of the data are inadequate, largely due to the use of inappropriate apparatus with high extracolumn dispersion. 

It should be pointed out, however, that the diffusivity of the solute in the mobile phase can be changed in two ways. The solute that is chromatographed can be changed, in which case the above assumptions are clearly valid, as (Ds) is likely to change linearly with (Dm)- However, the solute diffusivity can also be changed by the employing a different mobile phase. In this case, (Dm) will be changed but (Ds) will remain the same. In the second case, the above assumptions are not likely to be precisely correct. Nevertheless, if the resistance to mass transfer in the stationary phase makes only a small contribution to the overall value of (H) (i.e., because df dp (see equation (l)),then the assumption Dm = eDg will still be approximately... 

The specification development process is a data-driven activity that requires a validated analytical method. The levels of data needed include assay precision, replicate process results (process precision), and real-time stability profiles. A statistical analysis of these data is critical in setting a realistic specification. Most often, aggregation and fragmentation degradation mechanisms are common to protein and peptide therapeutics. Therefore, the SE-HPLC method provides a critical quality parameter that would need to be controlled by a specification limit. 

This weighting procedure for the linearized Arrhenius equation depends upon the validity of Eq. (6-7) for estimating the variance of y = In k. It will be recalled that this equation is an approximation, achieved by truncating a Taylor s series expansion at the linear term. With poor precision in the data this approximation may not be acceptable. A better estimate may be obtained by truncating after the quadratic term the result is... 

It may happen that AH is not available for the buffer substance used in the kinetic studies moreover the thermodynamic quantity A//° is not precisely the correct quantity to use in Eq. (6-37) because it does not apply to the experimental solvent composition. Then the experimentalist can determine AH. The most direct method is to measure AH calorimetrically however, few laboratories Eire equipped for this measurement. An alternative approach is to measure K, under the kinetic conditions of temperature and solvent this can be done potentiometrically or by potentiometry combined with spectrophotometry. Then, from the slope of the plot of log K a against l/T, AH is calculated. Although this value is not thermodynamically defined (since it is based on the assumption that AH is temperature independent), it will be valid for the present purpose over the temperature range studied. 

---