Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Uranium-contaminated groundwater

Ortiz-Bernad I, RT Anderson, HA Vrionis, DR Lovley (2004a) Resistance of solid-phase U(VI) to microbial reduction during in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. Appl Environ Microbiol 70 7558-7560. [Pg.160]

Chattanathan, S.A., Clement, T.P., Kanel, S.R., Barnett, M.O. Chatakondi, N. (2013) Remediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater by sorption onto hydroxyapatite derived from catfish bones. Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 224,1-9. [Pg.105]

Barton, C.S., Stewart, D.I., Morris, K. Bryant, D.E. (2004) Performance of three resin-based materials for treating uranium contaminated groundwater within a PRB. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 116, 191-204. [Pg.308]

Anderson RT et al. (2003) Stimulating the in site activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 69 5884-5891. [Pg.157]

Several application methods are available for enzymatic reduction and precipitation of uranium. These include bioreactors, placement of the microorganisms on solid substrates for filtration, or placement in groundwater to create precipitation zones through which the contaminated groundwater migrates. [Pg.1085]

Laboratory batch and column studies to evaluate Apatite II removal of soluble uranium from contaminated groundwater. American Chemical Society National Meeting, American Chemical Society, Division of Environmental Chemistry, 41, 109-113. [Pg.471]

Michel J, Jordana MJ. 1987. Nationwide distribution of radium-228 radon- 222 and uranium in groundwater. In Graves B, ed. Radon in ground water, radon, radium and other radioactivity in ground water Hydrogeologic impact and application to indoor airborne contamination Proc National Water Well Association conference, Somerset, NJ, April 7-9,1987. Chelsea, MI Lewis Publishers, Inc., 227-240. [Pg.377]

Naftz D. L., Fuller C. C., Davis J. A., Morrison S. J., Feltcorn E. M., Freethey G. W., Rowland R. C., Wilkowske C., and Piana M. (2002) Field demonstration of three permeable reactive barriers to control uranium contamination in groundwater. Fry Canyon, Utah. In Handbook of Groundwater Remediation Using Permeable Reactive Barriers—Applications to Radionuclides, Trace Metals, and Nutrients (eds. D. L. Naftz, S. J. Morrison, J. A. Davis, and C. C. Fuller). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 401-434. [Pg.4742]

Bryan C. R. and Siegel M. D. (1998) Irreversible adsorption of uranium onto iron oxides a mechanism for natural attenuation at uranium contaminated sites. In The Eighth Annual West Coast Conference on Contaminated Soils and Groundwater Abstracts and Supplemental Information. Association for the Environmental Health of Soils, Oxnard, CA, 201pp. [Pg.4792]

Hetal Contaminants in the Environment. From the perspective of environmental remediation, the focus of separation science should be on the metals currently being regulated from the standpoint of groundwater protection. This is not a hard and fast rule, as there are a number of situations (e.g., specific spills, waste-stream-specific toxins, etc.) where the focus will be on the removal of a specific hazardous metal compound or substance for which standards have not been set. For example, there is currently much emphasis within the DOE on uranium contamination at the Fernald Site in Ohio. [Pg.11]

Here, we use the Bear Creek Uranium example discussed in 6.2 to calculate the acidity of contaminated groundwater and tailings fluids. If the total acidity of groundwater and contaminated sediments, as well as the neutralization capacity of the aquifer matrix are known, the distance that the acid plume will migrate can be estimated based on mass balance. [Pg.161]

Bertsch PM, Hunter DB, Sutton SR, Bajt S, Rivers ML (1994) In situ chemical speciation of uranium in soils and sediments by micro X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 28 980-984 Bertsch PM and Seaman JC (1999) Characterization of complex mineral assemblages Implications for contaminant transport and environmental remediation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96 3350-3357 Beyersmann D, Koester A, Buttner B, Flessel P (1984) Model reactions of chromium compounds with mammalian and bacterial cells. Toxicol Environ Chem 8 279-286 Bhattachaiya P, Chatterjee D, Jacks G (1997) Occurrence of arsenic contaminated groundwater in alluvial aquifers from Delta Plains, Eastern India Options for safe drinking water supply. Int Jour Water Resources Management 13 79-92... [Pg.72]

Subsurface contamination by uranium wastes and contaminant speciation during transport from a wastewater pond (originating from a plutonium production plant) to groundwater were studied by Catalano et al. (2006). Land disposal of basic sodium aluminates and acidic U(VI)-Cn(ll) and their redistribution in the vadose zone resulted in development of a groundwater nraninm plume. The solid phase speciation of nraninm from the base of the pond, throngh the subsurface, to the... [Pg.342]

Fluor Daniel GTl, Inc. (now part of the IT Corporation), has developed in situ geochemical fixation technology to immobilize metallic contaminants in soil, sediment, sludge, and groundwater. The technology uses a site- and contaminant-specific combination of reagents to convert ionic contaminants to less soluble forms. In situ geochemical fixation has been used to remediate sites contaminated with chromium, uranium, molybdenum, and copper. [Pg.718]

VOCs), uranium, and heavy metals. There has been extensive research on various materials for use in PRBs. Metal-based PRBs are common because the reactive material is commercially available at low costs and has been effective on a variety of contaminants. Metal-based PRBs act as selective filters to contaminants and are being developed in response to the need for effective, low-cost technologies to remediate contaminated subsurface environments. The barriers are permeable to water and nontargeted groundwater constituents and impermeable or destructive to the target contaminant(s). [Pg.781]

Morrison, S. J., Tripathi, V. S. Spangler, R. R. 1995. Coupled reaction/transport modeling of a chemical barrier for controlling uranium (VI) contamination in groundwater. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 17, 347-363. [Pg.34]

Toulhoat, P., Gallien, J. P. et al. 1996. Preliminary studies of groundwater flow and migration of uranium isotopes around the Oklo Natural Reactors (Gabon). Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 21, 3-17. [Pg.34]


See other pages where Uranium-contaminated groundwater is mentioned: [Pg.4740]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.4740]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.2306]    [Pg.4753]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.100]   


SEARCH



Groundwater contaminant

Groundwater contaminated

Groundwater contamination

Uranium groundwater

© 2024 chempedia.info