Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Upper-convected time

Ata = -l,b = c = 0, equations [7.2.24] correspond to the Maxwell liquid with a discrete spectrum of relaxation times and the upper convective time derivative. For solution of polymer in a pure viscous liquid, it is convenient to represent this model in such a form that the solvent contribution into total stress tensor will be explicit ... [Pg.360]

The upper-convected time derivative is a time derivative in a special coordinate system whose base coordinate vectors stretch and rotate with material lines. With this definition of the upper-convected time derivative, stresses are produced only when material elements are deformed mere rotation produces no stress (see Section 1.4). Because of the way it is defined, the upper-convected time (teriva-tive of the Finger tensor is identically zero (see eqs. 2.2.3S and 1.4.13) ... [Pg.146]

Perhaps the simplest way to combine time-dependent phenomena and rheological nonlinearity is to incorporate nonlinearity into the simple Maxwell equation, eq. 3.2.18. This can be done by replacing the substantial time derivative in a tensor version of eq 3.2.18 with the upper-convected time derivative of r, using eq. 4.3.2 (Oldrpyd, 1950) ... [Pg.149]

Since K is homogeneous, vK = 0. Thus, the left-hand side is the upper-convected time derivative referred to in Chapter 4 (eq. 4.3.2), which is often designated by v over the tensor... [Pg.492]

Just as there are various possible finite strain tensors, there are various time derivatives that can be used in place of the ordinary derivative of stress in Eq. 10.21 to satisfy the continuum mechanics requirements for a model to be able to describe large, rapid deformations in arbitrary coordinate systems. The derivative that yields a differential model equivalent to Lodge s Eq. 10.6 is the upper convected time derivative (defined in Eq. 11.19), and the resulting model is called the upper-convected Maxwell model. Other possibilities include the lower-convected derivative and the corotational derivative. Furthermore, a weighted-sum of two of these derivatives can be used to formulate a differential constitutive equation for polymeric liquids. In particular, the Gordon-Schowalter convected derivative [7] is defined in this manner. [Pg.340]

Other combinations of upper- and lower-convected time derivatives of the stress tensor are also used to construct constitutive equations for viscoelastic fluids. For example, Johnson and Segalman (1977) have proposed the following equation... [Pg.12]

A review by Bird and Wiest [6] gives a more complete list of existing viscoelastic models. The upper convective model and the White-Metzner model are very similar with the exception that the White-Metzner model incorporates the strain rate effects of the relaxation time and the viscosity. Both models provide a first order approximation to flows, in which shear rate dependence and memory effects are important. However, both models predict zero second normal stress coefficients. The Giesekus model is molecular-based, non-linear in nature and describes thepower law region for viscosity andboth normal stress coefficients. The Phan-Thien Tanner models are based on network theory and give non-linear stresses. Both the Giesekus and Phan-Thien Tanner models have been successfully used to model complex flows. [Pg.77]

This difficulty can be overcome by the use of a viscoelastic model limiting the effect of the singularity in the transport equations. In the Modified Upper Convected Maxwell (MUCM) proposed by Apelian et al. (see [1]), the relaxation time X is a function of the trace of the deviatoric part of the extra stress tensor ... [Pg.251]

An upper-convected Maxwell model has been used with the full relaxation spectrum for the calculation of the stress, but for calculating the birefringence this spectrum has been restricted to long relaxation times as shown in Fig. 12. The model predictions for the data of the Fig. 9 are shown in Fig. 13. The deviations from the linear stress-optical nole are well accounted for by this very simple model. However, the model does not describe the stress data in simple elongation, and in particular the initial stress values at temperatures close to the Tg. [Pg.272]

It should be pointed out that the improvement of convergence might also be related to realistic preditions of shear and elongational viscosities by the Phan-Thien Tanner model, when compared to the Upper Convected Maxwell, Oldroyd-B and White-Metzner models. Satisfactory munerical results were also obtained with multi-mode integral constitutive equations using a spectnun of relaxation times [7, 17, 20-27], such as the K-BKZ model in the form introduced by Papanastasiou et al. [19]. [Pg.287]

It can be shown using Eq. (1-20) that the upper-convected Maxwell equation is equivalent to the Lodge integral equation, Eq. (3-24), with a single relaxation time. This is shown for the case of start-up of uniaxial extension in Worked Example 3.2. Thus, the simplest temporary network model with one relaxation time leads to the same constitutive equation for the polymer contribution to the stress as does the elastic dumbbell model. [Pg.126]

Note first that if the fluid is at a state of equilibrium with no flow, then the time derivative d is equal to zero, and the velocity gradient Vv is also zero. This implies from the above equations that = G8. Hence cr, i = <7 2 = ct t, = G at equilibrium, and aj = 0, for i j. Thus, although the diagonal stress components are not zero at equilibrium, they are all equal to each other, and the nondiagonal components are all equal to zero. Hence, the stress tensor is isotropic, but nonzero at equilibrium. (If one redefines the stress tensor as H = a — G8, then S " = 0 at equilibrium. The upper-convected Maxwell equation can then be rewritten in terms of Z .)... [Pg.181]

Figure 2a depicts the Poincare section of the continuous flow stirrer when St = 1/4ti, and Re = 0.1. The Poincare sections are obtained by numerically tracking four passive tracer particles initially located at (0.005, -0.5), (0.005, 0.0), (0.005, 0.5) and (0.005, 1.0) during 10 convective time-scales PI/Uhs)- a quasi-periodic motion of the passive tracer particle that is initially located at (0.005, 0.0) results in a regular formation separating the upper and lower halves of the Poincare section. A zoomed image showing this KAM boundary is presented in Fig. 2c. The passive tracer particles initially located at the upper and lower halves of the channel entry cannot pass this global barrier. In addition to this, there are two unstirred zones called void zones surrounded by well stirred zone (chaotic sea) at the bottom half of the Poincare section. A zoomed image of these two void zones can be seen in Fig. 2b. Figure 2a depicts the Poincare section of the continuous flow stirrer when St = 1/4ti, and Re = 0.1. The Poincare sections are obtained by numerically tracking four passive tracer particles initially located at (0.005, -0.5), (0.005, 0.0), (0.005, 0.5) and (0.005, 1.0) during 10 convective time-scales PI/Uhs)- a quasi-periodic motion of the passive tracer particle that is initially located at (0.005, 0.0) results in a regular formation separating the upper and lower halves of the Poincare section. A zoomed image showing this KAM boundary is presented in Fig. 2c. The passive tracer particles initially located at the upper and lower halves of the channel entry cannot pass this global barrier. In addition to this, there are two unstirred zones called void zones surrounded by well stirred zone (chaotic sea) at the bottom half of the Poincare section. A zoomed image of these two void zones can be seen in Fig. 2b.
Fixing the acceptable distortions (or errors) at a level 2 %, we can estimate the upper transition time when the impact of convection is negligible, from the relation [15] ... [Pg.40]

A and are phenomenological coefficients characteristic of the fluid, not the turbulence. The time derivative in Eq. (3) is the upper convected derivative of Oldroyd (7). In what follows,.A.and.. are assumed to be independent of the... [Pg.312]

The above equation is generalized to three dimensions by replacing the stress component T by the stress matrix and the strain component 7 by the strain matrix. This procedure works well as long as one confines oneself to small strains. For large strains, the time derivative of the stress requires special treatment to ensure that the principle of material objectivity(78) is not violated. This principle requires that the response of a material not depend on the position or motion of the observer. It turns out that one can construct several different time derivatives all of which satisfy this requirement and also reduce to the ordinary time derivative for infinitesimal strains. By experience over many years, it has been found (see Chapter 3 of Reference 79) that the Oldroyd contravariant derivative also called the codeformational derivative or the upper convected derivative, gives the most realistic results. This derivative can be written in Cartesian coordinates as(79)... [Pg.89]

Generally, it is found that while the upper convected Maxwell fluid, Eq. (26), and the Lodge rubberlike liquid, Eq. (31), predict the correct qualitative features of polymeric fluid behavior, the representation is not quantitative. In particular, in a stress-relaxation experiment, the relaxation takes place over too broad a range of time to be described by a single exponential. One therefore uses a spectrum of relaxation times, and modifies Eq. (30) to... [Pg.90]

For the generalized linear Maxwell model (GLM) and the upper convected model (UCM), the only material parameters needed are contained in the relaxation time spectrum of the material which can be obtained from simple linear viscoelastic measurements. For the Giesekus model, one needs in addition the mobility factors which Christensen and McKinley obtained by fitting the stress-strain curves of the adhesive. The advantage of the Giesekus model was that it provided them with a better description of the stress-strain curves. This, of course, is to be expected since those curves were used to deduce the parameters of the model. [Pg.519]

This is the constitutive equation or rheological equation of state for the elastic dumbbell suspensions. It is identical to the upper-convected Maxwell model, eq. 4.3.7. The molecular dynamics have led to a proper (frame-indifferent) time derivative and to a definition... [Pg.492]


See other pages where Upper-convected time is mentioned: [Pg.125]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.1068]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.1068]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.2430]    [Pg.6733]    [Pg.1472]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.110]   


SEARCH



Upper-convected time derivative

© 2024 chempedia.info