Strains matrix

For the transverse buckling mode in Figure 3-55, the matrix material expands or contracts in the y-direction. However, the matrix strain in the y-direction (transverse to the fibers) is presumed to be independent of y, i.e., simply twice the two adjacent fiber displacements, v, divided by the original distance between the fibers ... 

The basic assumption of this equation is that fiber strain, c/ is equal to the matrix strain, cm for any given stress applied to the composite. This assumption is reasonable for metal-metal systems but not for plastic or elastomer systems where the matrix has significantly lower modulus than the fiber. 

Arrays of Fault Planes. When we consider arrays of CS planes we can use the Fourier Transform method of evaluating the elastic-strain energy of the array, as well as the classical theory. This allows us to evaluate not only the elastic strain in the matrix between CS planes, but also to obtain some measure of the relaxation energy of the ions in the CS planes themselves. In this Section we will initially discuss the matrix strain, and then consider calculations which include relaxation. 

The geometry of the CS plane formed at any particular degree of reduction is not so sensitive to the strain in the matrix, but other energy terms become important. On the basis of the results of Shimizu and Iguchi, one would expect that the relaxation energy of the ions within the CS planes is very important in this respect. As temperatures increase it appears, from the results of Bursill, Netherway, and Grey, ° that matrix strain becomes more important and may dominate relaxation energy terms. 

In situ allowable matrix strain for compression, shear and tension. Ply angle measured from x-axis. 

There are a number of parameters that influence fatigue—the type of fiber and matrix strain to failure and the strengths of fiber and matrix the laminate configuration and the cycling frequency. Figure 17.59 shows the superior fatigue performance of carbon fiber epoxy laminate over glass and aramid. 

In meshes with a rectangular pattern the reinforcement area Sr is divided into transversal and longitudinal directions Sr = Srj- + Sr. The value of the ultimate matrix strain is difficult to determine because it is related to the definition of a crack. It is generally admitted that for a non-reinforced matrix = 100 - 200.10 . The first deviation from the linear behaviour as observed on the stress-strain or load-deformation curves for ferrocement elements corresponds to = 900 - 1500.10 , but these values are strongly influenced by the volume and type of reinforcement. It has been proved that thinner wires, densely distributed, perform better than thicker ones. 

It is difficult to determine the maximum matrix strain before cracks are open because it may vary considerably. In a more developed material structure, composed of inclusions, pores, fibres, etc., the value of is higher than in homogeneous ones like cement paste. As to the heterogeneity of the matrix, not only are the differences between hard inclusions, weaker paste and voids considered, but also the fact that certain macroscopic composite regions have considerably different mechanical properties than others. 

E and A are Young s modulus and cross-sectional area of the fibre, respectively, is the uniform matrix strain, G is the shear modulus of the matrix. Corresponding diagrams of bond stress t and tensile stress a in the fibre are shown in Figure 8.11. Values of the tensile stress a (x) in the fibre are obtained directly from equation (8.9). 

The knowledge based on research in the field of advanced composites was partly used in brittle matrix composites, mainly for the stage of early cracking that appears because the ultimate matrix strain is much lower than that of the fibres e. ... 

In Fig. 5, the stress of the system is compared with that in the atomistic box. It is apparent that this ratio assumes almost constant values between plastic events with sudden increases at these events. Because the elastic constants of the matrix are those calculated from the atomistie box at the outset of the simulations, the system is homogeneous at small strains. As the system strain increases further, the atomistie box beeomes softer than the perfectly elastic matrix ( strain softening ). 

Fig. 19 Axial strain of fibre as a function of the position along the fibre. The matrix strain Is given by e. ...

Figure 8.12 shows the distribution of strain along a single Kevlar 149 fibre in a model single-fibre epoxy composite [38] calculated from the point-to-point variation of the shift of the 1610cm aramid Raman band. Measurements were taken at 20 pm intervals along the fibre for different levels of matrix strain e ranging from 0% to 2.0% in intervals of 0.4%, and the curves drawn are best fits to the experimental data. It can be seen that in the unstrained case (e = 0%) there is no strain in the fibre. As increases the strain in the fibre increases from... 

Figure 8.12 E>erived variation of fibre strain with distance along the Kevlar 149 fibre in a single-fibre composite tensile specimen at different indicated levels of matrix strain e (after [38])...

This behaviour is shown more clearly in Figure 8.13, in which the data points from Figure 8.12 are fitted to theoretical curves calculated from Equation (3) at matrix strain levels of 0.4%, 0.8% and 1.2%. The value of R was assumed to be the half-width of the matrix resin bar, and the matrix shear modulus was calculated from the matrix tensile modulus and Poisson s ratio at the relevant... 

Figure 8.16 Dependence of the maximum interfacial shear stress upon matrix strain for the sized and de-sized Kevlar 49 fibres in an epoxy resin matrix (data taken from Figure 8.1S). The horizontal dashed line represents the shear yield stress of the epoxy resin, along with the scatter band of the measurements (after [38])...

The maximum interfadal shear stress values for the sized and de-sized Kevlar 49 fibres are shown in Figure 8.16 as a function of applied matrix strain. It is dearly shown that the values of maximum interfadal shear stress for the de-sized fibres are less than those for the sized fibres at all levels of applied matrix strain. It is shown that the interfadal shear stress for the de-sized fibres reaches a maximum value of 43 MPa, which is close to the shear yield stress of the epoxy resin matrix [77] indicated by the dashed line in Figure 8.16. 

Fig. 12 Contour maps of strain mapped over the graphene monolayer in a model composite. Maps are shown for the original flake before coating with the top polymer layer and then after coating with the top polymer layer at different levels of matrix strain indicated. (After ref 132.)... 

Since fibers are assumed to deform in conformity with the matrix, strain energy in these elements may be split into two coxiponents. 

---