United Kingdom analytical methods

Thomas, L.C. and Chamberlin, G.J., Colorimetric Chemical Analytical Methods . Tintometer Ltd, Salisbury, United Kingdom, 1980. 

Another characteristic example of analytical strategy is that followed in the United Kingdom for the analysis of tranquilizers and -blockers (78). A total of 180 samples distributed over a whole year (15 samples per month) should be analyzed within a turnaround time of 28 days from receipt of sample. In that case, the expense of developing a two-tier analytical strategy was not justified by the sample throughput. Thus, the selection was direct application of a multiresidue LC/PDA confirmatory method (80). 

AMC (2001a). What should be done with results below the detection limit Mentioning the unmentionable. In AMC (Analytical Methods Committee) Technical Brief No 5. Royal Society of Chemistry, United Kingdom. 

Having collected or received samples from each location, each laboratory prepared and analysed the samples in accordance with their own routine analytical methods using their own quality assured procedures i.e. no attempt was made to enforce the use of completely consistent methods or the use of single procedures by both laboratories. All of the samples were analysed by gamma spectrometry. In addition, samples collected at Heysham and Cardiff were analysed for Tc and Total H, respectively. Both laboratories use methods that are acceditated by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) to the 18017025 2005 standard. 

Variability Of Blank Responses. In order to limit the discussion, let us focus on water analyses as representative of environmental analyses. In the United Kingdom, the Standing Committee of Analysts of the Department of the Environment issues analytical methods In a series of booklets. Included among these are the Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials. 10-14) Several of these methods have been evaluated by Individual laboratories to determine the limit of detection based on the variability of the blank and using paired comparisons for blank correction. Published values for the limit of detection for several of these methods are... 

It Is apparent from the above descriptions of official methods of analysis In the United States that none of them specify that detection limits should be determined based on the variability of the blank for a complete analytical procedure. This contrasts sharply with the policy of the Standing Committee of Analysts In the United Kingdom, which Is to preferably determine the limit of detection based on the variability of the blank. Why Is this One reason Is the difference In emphasis on the blank Itself. While In the U.K. they have required that blank correction be a part of the procedure. In the U.S.A. we have not only not required blank correction but have even prohibited blank correction In some of our official methods. 

All instrumental analytical methods except coulometry (Chapter 15) require calibration standards, which have known concentrations of the analyte present in them. (In isotope dilution MS [IDMS], there must be a known amount of an isotope, usually of the analyte.) These calibration standards are used to establish the relationship between the analytical signal being measured by the instrument and the concentration of the analyte. Once this relationship is established, unknown samples can be measured and the analyte concentrations determined. Analytical methods should require some sort of reference standard or check standard. This is also a standard of known composition with a known concentration of the analyte. This check standard is not one of the calibration standards and should be from a different lot of material than the calibration standards. It is run as a sample to confirm that the calibration is correct and to assess the accuracy and precision of the analysis. Reference standard materials are available from government and private sources in many countries. Examples of government sources are the NIST in the United States, the National Research Council of Canada (NRCC), and the LGC (formerly Laboratory of the Government Chemist) in the United Kingdom. 

Stilbenoids represent a group of important natural products in the plant kingdom. The developments of modem analytical methods accelerate the discovery of these compounds, and to this day more than 1,000 stilbenoids have been isolated. For the stilbenes, bibenzyls, and phenanthrenes, these three groups shared the feature of their nucleus with hydroxyls, methyl, methoxy, prenyl, geranyl, glycosyl, etc., substituents. The oligostilbenes and bisbibenzyls are formed by polymerization of stilbene and bibenzyl units, and the diverse polymerized patterns produced their... 

The concentrations of interest in satisfying regulations in the United States and the United Kingdom are in the parts-per-trillion range and lower. However, conventional analytical methods such as flame atomic absorption, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry cannot achieve parts-per-trillion detection limits because the u.sc of nebuli crs to transfer samples to the atomizer is quite inefficient (often only 2% or less of the sample is transferred). ... 

In the United States, several tests using bacteria as the test organisms have been adopted as standardized methods. The primary test used is the use-dilution method from the AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has also developed virucidal test procedures. In western Europe, disinfection tests are published as national standards in France (AFNOR), the United Kingdom (BSI), and Germany (DIN). 

---