Unit objective variables

Unit objective variables These include top and bottom compositions. They are regulated to achieve the second objective, i.e., meet-... 

The two main ways of data pre-processing are mean-centering and scaling. Mean-centering is a procedure by which one computes the means for each column (variable), and then subtracts them from each element of the column. One can do the same with the rows (i.e., for each object). ScaUng is a a slightly more sophisticated procedure. Let us consider unit-variance scaling. First we calculate the standard deviation of each column, and then we divide each element of the column by the deviation. 

Everything in Swarm is an object with three main characteristics Name, Data and Rules. An object s Name consists of an ID that is used to send messages to the object, a type and a module name. An object s Data consists of whatever local data (i.e. internal state variables) the user wants an agent to possess. The Rules are functions to handle any messages that are sent to the object. The basic unit of Swarm is a swarm a collection of objects with a schedule of event over those objects. Swarm also supplies the user with an interface and analysis tools. 

To conclude this section on systems with multiple objectives, we will consider a specific plasma etching unit case study. This unit will be analyzed considering both categorical and continuous performance measurement variables. Provided that similar preference structures are expressed in both instances, we will see that the two approaches lead to similar final answers. Additional applications of the learning methodologies to multiobjective systems can be found in Saraiva and Stephanopoulos (1992b, c). 

This case study is based on real industrial data collected from a plasma etching plant, as presented and discussed in Reece et al. (1989). The task of the unit is to remove the top layer from wafers, while preserving the bottom one. Four different objectives and performance variables are considered ... 

The simplest model arises when sampling units are randomly selected from a large target population and analyzed without analytical error. If the objective of the study Is to estimate the average concentration of a pollutant In a population (letting x represent the concentration, a continuous variable), then... 

Uncertainties in amounts of products to be manufactured Qi, processing times %, and size factors Sij will influence the production time tp, whose uncertainty reflects the individual uncertainties that can be presented as probability distributions. The distributions for shortterm uncertainties (processing times and size factors) can be evaluated based on knowledge of probability distributions for the uncertain parameters, i.e. kinetic parameters and other variables used for the design of equipment units. The probability of not being able to meet the total demand is the probability that the production time is larger than the available production time H. Hence, the objective function used for deterministic design takes the form ... 

The signal propagation in the MLF networks is similar to that of the perceptron-like networks, described in Section 44.4.1. For each object, each unit in the input layer is fed with one variable of the X matrix and each unit in the output layer is intended to provide one variable of the Y table. The values of the input units are passed unchanged to each unit of the hidden layer. The propagation of the signal from there on can be summarized in three steps. 

The investigators divided the collection units into a number of subunits, each subunit measuring 3 ft by 3 ft. A total of 250 different collection units underneath the soil liner were monitored independently to determine the rate of flow. The objective was to correlate the variability of the hydraulic conductivity of the liner with the molding water content of the soil and with the dry density of the compacted soil. 

This procedure9,10 begins by electing a step size for each of the independent variables. These step sizes are all made unity by changing the units. A starting point is chosen and a unit step change is made sequentially in each of the variables. As before, if the objective function improves the move is considered success the point is retained and the search continues from it. If the move is a failure the point is... 

The results in the second and third columns were obtained using GAMS 2.5/OSL in a 600 MHz Pentium III processor, while those in the fourth and fifth columns were taken directly from Ierapetritou and Floudas (1998). The approach based on the SSN representation gives an objective value of 71.473 and requires only 15 binary variables, compared to 48 and 46 binary variables required in approaches proposed by Zhang, and Schilling and Pantelides, respectively. The formulation by Ierapetritou and Floudas (1998) initially consisted of 30 binary variables that were later reduced to 15 by exploiting one to one correspondence of units and tasks. It... 

The case study was solved using the uneven discretization of time formulation presented in this chapter. The mathematical model for the scenario without heat integration (standalone mode) involved 88 binary variables and gave an objective value of 1060 rcu. This value corresponds to the production of 14 t of product and external utility consumption of 12 energy units of steam and 20 energy units... 

The use of standardized data (variable standardization or column autoscaling, see Frank and Todeschini [1994]) results in data which are independent of the unit of measurement. Other types of standardization like object standardization, row autoscaling, or global standardization (global autoscaling, (xij — x)/s) do not play a large role in data analysis. 

The occurrence of the set-up procedure in period i is denoted by the binary variable Wi (0 = no, 1 = yes). The production costs per batch are denoted by p = 1.0 and the cost for a set-up is y = 3.0. Demands di that are satisfied in the same period as requested result in a regular sale Mi with a full revenue of a = 2.0 per unit of product. Demands that are satisfied with a tardiness of one period result in a late sale Mf with a reduced revenue of aL = 1.5 per unit. Demands which are not satisfied in the same or in the next period result in a deficit Bf with a penalty of a = 0.5 per unit. The surplus production of each period is stored and can be sold later. The amount of batches stored at the end of a period is denoted by Mf and the storage costs are a+ =0.1 per unit. The objective is to maximize the profit over a horizon of H periods. The cost function P contains terms for sales revenues, penalties, production costs, and storage costs. For technical reasons, the model is reformulated as a minimization problem ... 

However, if you extend this notion to an extreme and make 100,000 production runs of one unit each (actually one unit every 315 seconds), the decision obviously is impractical, since the cost of producing 100,000 units, one unit at a time, will be exorbitant. It therefore appears that the desired operating procedure lies somewhere in between the two extremes. To arrive at some quantitative answer to this problem, first define the three operating variables that appear to be important number of units of each run (D), the number of runs per year (n), and the total number of units produced per year (Q). Then you must obtain details about the costs of operations. In so doing, a cost (objective) function and a mathematical model will be developed, as discussed later on. After obtaining a cost model, any constraints on the variables are identified, which allows selection of independent and dependent variables. 

Formulate a complete mathematical statement of the problem, and label each individual part, identifying the objective function and constraints with the correct units (, days, etc.). Make a list of the variables by names and symbol plus units. Do not solve. 

Objective functions that allow only discrete values of the independent variable ) occur frequently in process design because the process variables assume only specific values rather than continuous ones. Examples are the cost per unit diameter of pipe, the cost per unit area for heat exchanger surface, or the insulation cost considered in Example 1.1. For a pipe, we might represent the installed cost as a function of the pipe diameter as shown in Figure 4.2 [see also Noltie (1978)]. For... 

Many real problems do not satisfy these convexity assumptions. In chemical engineering applications, equality constraints often consist of input-output relations of process units that are often nonlinear. Convexity of the feasible region can only be guaranteed if these constraints are all linear. Also, it is often difficult to tell if an inequality constraint or objective function is convex or not. Hence it is often uncertain if a point satisfying the KTC is a local or global optimum, or even a saddle point. For problems with a few variables we can sometimes find all KTC solutions analytically and pick the one with the best objective function value. Otherwise, most numerical algorithms terminate when the KTC are satisfied to within some tolerance. The user usually specifies two separate tolerances a feasibility tolerance Sjr and an optimality tolerance s0. A point x is feasible to within if... 

A process can also be represented by its adjacency matrix, which can be formed without first drawing the graph, by just assigning each unit a number and placing a nonzero entry in column j and row i if there is a stream directed from unit j to unit /. Once the adjacency matrix is formed, it can be partitioned into blocks of units that must be solved simultaneously exactly as described in Section IV. It is the tearing of these blocks that is of interest here. In both of the methods of tearing discussed here the objective is to tear a block so that the minimum number of variables will have to be assumed in solving the process equations involved in the block. 

Sargent (SI) proposed a method of tearing in which all of the possible orderings of units in a block are considered, and dynamic programming is used to find the optimum order. The objective of the algirithm is to order the units into a sequence such that the minimum number of variables are associated with the output streams of units that feed preceeding units in the sequence. The objective is equivalent to ordering the units so that the maximum number of variables are associated with the feed forward streams. 

---