Transformed Hamiltonians Applications

The above method is formal in the sense that the convergence of the various series is not discussed. Indeed, the series diverge for many applications. However, the lower orders of the transformed system can give interesting information, and the process can be stopped at a certain order M. This means that these terms of the series are useful to construct both the transformed Hamiltonian and the generating function, since they are unaffected by the ultimately divergent character of the whole process. 

In the next two sections we shall present the theory of transformed Hamiltonians and applications obtained in the framework of the Schwerpunkt of the German Science Foundation on Relativistic Effects on Heavy-Element Chemistry and Physics. 

This expression is obtained directly from the four-component DKS Hamiltonian, avoiding the free-particle Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation. After application... 

Before reviewing applications to large or extended systems (Section 4), we will illustrate the performance of various one- and two-component DKH-DF approaches using atoms and small molecules of heavy elements as benchmark systems. We will compare results of DKH calculations to those of four-component relativistic methods and other approaches based on transformed Hamiltonians. In many cases, results obtained with pseudopotentials are also available, but will be not considered here because of their computational efficiency, pseudopotential calculations are by far the most widely used strategy for heavy-element compounds. 

In recent years, higher orders of the DK transformation were formulated and explored in benchmark calculations on small molecules. Furthermore, it was shown that highly accurate transformed two-component Hamiltonians can be generated via the DK transformations of higher orders. These Hamiltonians converge quite well for the known elements of the periodic table limits of accuracy become noticeable only for elements with Z > 120. Higher orders of DK transformed Hamiltonians yield only small corrections for molecular observables thus, for most applications with normal demands of accuracy, DK2 is a reasonable, efficient, and well established choice. A valuable alternative is provided by the ZORA scheme, as comparison of available results shows. On the other hand, in the near future, accurate four-component approaches are expected to be essentially restricted to benchmark calculations due to their computational requirements. 

By using the general power series expansion for U all the infinitely many parametrizations of a unitary transformation are treated on an equal footing. However, the question about the equivalence of these parametrizations for application in decoupling Dirac-like one-electron operators needs to be studied. It is furthermore not clear a priori whether the antihermitean matrix W can always be chosen in the appropriate way the mandatory properties of W, i.e., its oddness, antihermiticity and behavior as a certain power in the chosen expansion parameter, have to be checked for every single transformation U applied to the untransformed or any pre-transformed Hamiltonian. Since the even expansion coefficients follow from the odd coefficients, the radius of convergence Rc of the power series depends strongly on the choice of the odd coefficients. 

Analogous relations hold for three-fermion terms, which also occur in the transformed Hamiltonian. After complex application of the Wick s theorem on all fermion operators we get the normal form of the Hamiltonian in the general representation. 

In this chapter, we focus on the method of constraints and on ABF. Generalized coordinates are first described and some background material is provided to introduce the different free energy techniques properly. The central formula for practical calculations of the derivative of the free energy is given. Then the method of constraints and ABF are presented. A newly derived formula, which is simpler to implement in a molecular dynamics code, is given. A discussion of some alternative approaches (steered force molecular dynamics [35-37] and metadynamics [30-34]) is provided. Numerical examples illustrate some of the applications of these techniques. We finish with a discussion of parameterized Hamiltonian functions in the context of alchemical transformations. 

A familiar example of Legendre transformation is the relationship that exists between the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian functions of classical mechanics [17]. In thermodynamics the simplest application is to the internal energy function for constant mole number U(S, V), with the differentials... 

In this chapter we introduce the SchrSdinger equation this equation is fundamental to all applications of quantum mechanics to chemical problems. For molecules of chemical interest it is an equation which is exceedingly difficult to solve and any possible simplifications due to the symmetry of the system concerned are very welcome. We are able to introduce symmetry, and thereby the results of the previous chapters, by proving one single but immensely valuable fact the transformation operators Om commute with the Hamiltonian operator, Jf. It is by this subtle thread that we can then deduce some of the properties of the solutions of the Schrodinger equation without even solving it. 

All of the analyses described above are used in a predictive mode. That is, given the molecular Hamiltonian, the sources of the external fields, the constraints, and the disturbances, the focus has been on designing an optimal control field for a particular quantum dynamical transformation. Given the imperfections in our knowledge and the unavoidable external disturbances, it is desirable to devise a control scheme that has feedback that can be used to correct the evolution of the system in real time. A schematic outline of the feedback scheme starts with a proposed control field, applies that field to the molecular system that is to be controlled, measures the success of the application, and then uses the difference between the achieved and desired final state to design a change that improves the control field. Two issues must be addressed. First, does a feedback mechanism of the type suggested exist Second, which features of the overall control process are most efficiently subject to feedback control ... 

Any one-parameter set of transformations obeying this rule under successive applications can be said to be a representation of the dilatation group. Thus relation (8.5) identifies the RG mapping constructed in Sect. 8.1 as a representation of dilatations in the space of models parameterized by /, n, / . We now work out some properties of the dilatation group represented in some general space with coordinates Y = Yj = Yi. Y , Y3,.... This space for instance may be the space of all Hamiltonians, the coordinates Y> being the coupling constants. 

The formulas of Appendix A are easily transformed to time-dependent forms via the Fourier-Laplace transform. For the purpose of upcoming extensions to the nonself adjoint case, we introduce the self-adjoint Hamiltonian H = FT = Htt. Furthermore the function 0 considered above is said to belong to the domain of the operator H, i.e.,

self-adjoint problems D(W) = D(H) and for bounded operators, the range R(H) and the domain D(H) are identical with the full Hilbert space however, in general applications they will differ as we will see later. 

---