Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Operators transformation

Integral-Transform Method A number of integral transforms are used in the solution of differential equations. Only one, the Laplace transform, will be discussed here [for others, see Integral Transforms (Operational Methods) ]. The one-sided Laplace transform indicated by L[f t)] is defined by the equation L[f t)] = /(O dt. It has... [Pg.458]

Equations of Convolution Type The equation u x) = f x) + X K(x — t)u(t) dt is a special case of the linear integral equation of the second land of Volterra type. The integral part is the convolution integral discussed under Integral Transforms (Operational Methods) so the solution can be accomplished by Laplace transforms L[u x)] = E[f x)] + XL[u x)]LIK x)] or... [Pg.461]

Other types of transformers include instrument, radio-frequency, wide-band, narrow-band, and electronic transformers. Each of these transformers operates similarly and is used in specific applications best suited for the transformer s design characteristics. [Pg.1156]

The square of this matrix element in< at t = — 00 will be found in the state at t = +00. The transformation operator S is the /S-matrix of Heisenberg. We shall return later in this section to the problem of evaluating the -matrix. [Pg.587]

Assume that there exists a unitary operator U(it) which maps the Heisenberg operator Q(t) at time t into the operator (—<). Assume further that this mapping has the property of leaving the hamiltonian invariant, i.e., that U(it)SU(it)" 1 = H. Consider then the equation satisfied by the transformed operator... [Pg.687]

When there is only one time variable during a 2D experiment, i.e., U, why do we need to process the data through two Fourier transformation operations ... [Pg.155]

The two-dimensional data set S tu t ) requires two Fourier transformation operations. Explain why the time variable is almost always Fourier transformed before I]. [Pg.171]

It is assumed that a given Fourier-transform operation, represented by... [Pg.142]

L length, depth of bed, m mass velocity of liquid, m3 m-2 s-1 Laplace transform operator... [Pg.645]

The m/z values of peptide ions are mathematically derived from the sine wave profile by the performance of a fast Fourier transform operation. Thus, the detection of ions by FTICR is distinct from results from other MS approaches because the peptide ions are detected by their oscillation near the detection plate rather than by collision with a detector. Consequently, masses are resolved only by cyclotron frequency and not in space (sector instruments) or time (TOF analyzers). The magnetic field strength measured in Tesla correlates with the performance properties of FTICR. The instruments are very powerful and provide exquisitely high mass accuracy, mass resolution, and sensitivity—desirable properties in the analysis of complex protein mixtures. FTICR instruments are especially compatible with ESI29 but may also be used with MALDI as an ionization source.30 FTICR requires sophisticated expertise. Nevertheless, this technique is increasingly employed successfully in proteomics studies. [Pg.383]

The notation ] means the z-transformation operation. The values are the magnitudes of the continuous function / ) (before impulse-sampling) at the sampling periods. We will use the notation that the z transform of/J, is F,, . [Pg.626]

The recognition of consonant bifunctional relationships in the target molecule allows their disconnection by a retro-Claisen, a retro-aldol or a retro-Mannich condensation or by retro-Michael addition [equivalent, according to Corey s formalisation, to the application of the corresponding transforms (= operators) to the appropriate retrons]. [Pg.89]

The imidazoUdinonium salt 12 HC1 was shown to be an excellent catalyst for the Diels-Alder reaction of a,P-unsaturated aldehydes 15 (Scheme 2) [3]. Using just 5 mol% of the catalyst at room temperature in a methanol/water mixture (19 1), adducts were obtained in excellent yield (75-99%) and enantiomeric excess (84-93%). The simplicity of these transformations, operating at room temperature in the presence of moisture and air without the need for rigorous purification of solvents and reagents, makes these procedures highly practical and opened up a new area for further research. [Pg.287]

In the method based on the unitary transformation, we start by writing the exact wavefunction th in terms of the reference function and a unitary transformation operator in Fock space ... [Pg.326]

Figures 7 and 8 plot deviations of total energies from FCI results for the various methods. It is clear that the CASSCF/L-CTD theory performs best out of all the methods smdied. (We recall that although the canonical transformation operator exp A does not explicitly include single excitations, the main effects are already included via the orbital relaxation in the CASSCF reference.) The absolute error of the CASSCF/L-CTD theory at equilibrium—1.57 mS (6-31G), 2.26 m j (cc-pVDZ)—is slightly better than that of CCSD theory—1.66m j (6-31G), 3.84 m j (cc-pVDZ) but unlike for the CCSD and CCSDT theories, the CASSCF/L-CTD error stays quite constant as the molecule is pulled apart while the CC theories exhibit a nonphysical turnover and a qualitatively incorrect dissociation curve. The largest error for the CASSCF/L-CTD method occurs at the intermediate bond distance of 1.8/ with an error of —2.34m (6-3IG), —2.42 mE j (cc-pVDZ). Although the MRMP curve is qualitatively correct, it is not quantitatively correct especially in the equilibrium region, with an error of 6.79 mEfi (6-3IG), 14.78 mEk (cc-pVDZ). One measure of the quality of a dissociation curve is the nonparallelity error (NPE), the absolute difference between the maximum and minimum deviations from the FCI energy. For MRMP the NPE is 4mE (6-3IG), 9mE, (cc-pVDZ), whereas for CASSCF/ L-CTD the NPE is 5 mE , (6-3IG), 6 mE , (cc-pVDZ), showing that the CASSCF/L-CTD provides a quantitative description of the bond breaking with a nonparallelity error competitive with that of MRMP. Figures 7 and 8 plot deviations of total energies from FCI results for the various methods. It is clear that the CASSCF/L-CTD theory performs best out of all the methods smdied. (We recall that although the canonical transformation operator exp A does not explicitly include single excitations, the main effects are already included via the orbital relaxation in the CASSCF reference.) The absolute error of the CASSCF/L-CTD theory at equilibrium—1.57 mS (6-31G), 2.26 m j (cc-pVDZ)—is slightly better than that of CCSD theory—1.66m j (6-31G), 3.84 m j (cc-pVDZ) but unlike for the CCSD and CCSDT theories, the CASSCF/L-CTD error stays quite constant as the molecule is pulled apart while the CC theories exhibit a nonphysical turnover and a qualitatively incorrect dissociation curve. The largest error for the CASSCF/L-CTD method occurs at the intermediate bond distance of 1.8/ with an error of —2.34m (6-3IG), —2.42 mE j (cc-pVDZ). Although the MRMP curve is qualitatively correct, it is not quantitatively correct especially in the equilibrium region, with an error of 6.79 mEfi (6-3IG), 14.78 mEk (cc-pVDZ). One measure of the quality of a dissociation curve is the nonparallelity error (NPE), the absolute difference between the maximum and minimum deviations from the FCI energy. For MRMP the NPE is 4mE (6-3IG), 9mE, (cc-pVDZ), whereas for CASSCF/ L-CTD the NPE is 5 mE , (6-3IG), 6 mE , (cc-pVDZ), showing that the CASSCF/L-CTD provides a quantitative description of the bond breaking with a nonparallelity error competitive with that of MRMP.

See other pages where Operators transformation is mentioned: [Pg.557]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.288]   


SEARCH



A satisfactory set of transformation operators

Annihilation operators unitary transformations

Cartesian coordinates operator transformation from

Contact transformation perturbation operator

Creation operators unitary transformations

Douglas-Kroll-Transformed Spin-Orbit Operators

Effective operators norm-preserving transformations

Exponential unitary transformations of the elementary operators

Fourier transformation operator

Fourier transformation spectrometer operation

Inverse operator transformation

Kinetic energy operator, transformed, with

Laplace transform operations, Table

Linear Operators and Transformation Matrices

Linear transformations (operators) in Euclidean space

Lorentz transformation operator

Many-particle operator similarity transformation

Operation count integral transformation

Operations transformation

Operations transformation

Operations which Transform Fibres into Fabric

Operator gauge transformed

Operators general transformation

Operators scaling transformations

Operators transformed

Operators transformed

Spin operator unitary transformation

Transformation of Electric Property Operators

Transformation of Magnetic Property Operators

Transformation of operators

Transformation operators Og

Transformed Operators for Electric and Magnetic Properties

Unitary exponential operator transformation

Wave operator and Van-Vleck transformation

© 2024 chempedia.info