Tissues mineralized, mechanical

It is intriguing to try to analyze if differences in mechanochemical transduction mechanisms could explain why some tissues mineralize normally and others do not. This would make it possible to attempt to analyze why heart valves and vessel walls mineralize abnormally in diseases leading to valvular failure or cardiac insufficiency. 

Mechanical and Chemical Characterization Enamel has often been viewed as a homogeneous solid [2, 3], but Knoop microhardness tests [4, 5] and compression tests [6] have shown that the Young s modulus (E) and hardness (H) are higher for cusp (or surface) enamel than for side (or subsurface) enamel. Depth-sensing Vickers indentation [7] has shown that the H and E obtained from an occlusal section of enamel are higher than those for an axial section. The variations in mechanical properties with location have been explained in terms of the degree of tissue mineralization. Notably,... 

The release of carbonate groups from the HA structure results in a decrease of the thermal stability and in the formation of calcium oxide as a decomposition product of the bone tissue mineral phase, which affects the mechanical properties as well as the biocompatibility of the as-fabricated materials [46, 47]. The loss of carbonate groups can however be prevented by performing the heat-treatment in a carbon dioxide containing atmosphere [47]. 

The properties described above have important consequences for the way in which these skeletal tissues are subsequently preserved, and hence their usefulness or otherwise as recorders of dietary signals. Several points from the discussion above are relevant here. It is useful to ask what are the most important mechanisms or routes for change in buried bones and teeth One could divide these processes into those with simple addition of new non-apatitic material (various minerals such as pyrites, silicates and simple carbonates) in pores and spaces (Hassan and Ortner 1977), and those related to change within the apatite crystals, usually in the form of recrystallization and crystal growth. The first kind of process has severe implications for alteration of bone and dentine, partly because they are porous materials with high surface area initially and because the approximately 20-30% by volume occupied by collagen is subsequently lost by hydrolysis and/or consumption by bacteria and the void filled by new minerals. Enamel is much denser and contains no pores or Haversian canals and there is very, little organic material to lose and replace with extraneous material. Cracks are the only interstices available for deposition of material. 

Although many physiological and biochemical processes In plants are affected by various allelochemicals, In most Instances the details of the mechanism of action of a particular allelochemical have not been elucidated. Because soil mediates the transfer of most allelochemicals (except perhaps volatile compounds) from a donor to a receiver, plant roots are often the first tissues to contact an allelochemical. Thus, It Is not surprising that root growth and development are Inhibited In many Instances of allelopathy (1.-3) One of the primary physiological functions of plant roots Is the absorption of mineral nutrients. Therefore, It Is logical that the Influence of allelopathic Interactions on mineral absorption by plant roots has been Investigated. 

Bone and teeth in mammals and bony fishes all rely on calcium phosphates in the form of hydroxyapatite [Ca5(P04)30H]2, usually associated with around 5% carbonate (and referred to as carbonated apatite). The bones of the endoskeleton and the dentin and enamel of teeth have a high mineral content of carbonated apatite, and represent an extraordinary variety of structures with physical and mechanical properties exquisitely adapted to their particular function in the tissue where they are produced. We begin by discussing the formation of bone and then examine the biomineralization process leading to the hardest mineralized tissue known, the enamel of mammalian teeth. 

Mechanic GL, Gallop PM and Tanzer ML (1971) The nature of crosslinking in collagens from mineralized tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 45, 644-653. 

In contrast to soft biologies, whose mechanical properties primarily depend upon the orientation of collagen fibers, the mechanical properties of mineralized tissues, or hard biologies, are more complicated. Factors such as density, mineral content, fat content, water content, and sample preservation and preparation play important roles in mechanical property determination. Specimen orientation also plays a key role, since most hard biologies such as bone are composite structures. For the most part, we will concentrate on the average properties of these materials and will relate these values to those of important, man-made replacement materials. 

Looking at the literature in the field of biomineralization, one notices, that the majority of articles is descriptive in nature. On the basis of electron micrographs or thin section studies, the intricate relationships between mineral phase and organic matrix are investigated. Other papers deal with the chemical composition of the mineralized tissue and the minerals. Only a few authors address themselves to the question of metal ion transport mechanisms in cellular systems and the solid state principles involved in mineral deposition on organic substrates. All three sets of information, however, are essential to understand calcification processes. It appears, therefore, that information on the functionality of metal ions in living systems and their role in mineral deposition are particularly desired in this area of research. 

---