Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tensile strength nanocomposites

The data provided by Toyota Research Group of Japan on polyamide-MMT nanocomposites indicate tensile strength improvements of approximately 40%-50% at 23°C and modulus improvement of about 70% at the same temperature. Heat distortion temperature has been shown to increase from 65°C for the unmodified polyamide to 152°C for the nanoclay-modified material, all the above having been achieved with just a 5% loading of MMT clay. Similar mechanical property improvements were presented for polymethyl methacrylate-clay hybrids [27]. [Pg.34]

FIG. 9 Dependence of tensile strength and modulus on clay loading for epoxy-CH3(CH2)i7NH -montmorillonite nanocomposites. (From Ref. 35.)... [Pg.663]

Nylon-6-clay nanocomposites were also prepared by melt intercalation process [49]. Mechanical and thermal testing revealed that the properties of Nylon-6-clay nanocomposites are superior to Nylon. The tensile strength, flexural strength, and notched Izod impact strength are similar for both melt intercalation and in sim polymerization methods. However, the heat distortion temperature is low (112°C) for melt intercalated Nylon-6-nanocomposite, compared to 152°C for nanocomposite prepared via in situ polymerization [33]. [Pg.667]

Silanol-terminated PDMS and hexadecyltrimethylammonium-exchanged clay were used to prepare PDMS-clay nanocomposites via melt intercalation [90]. The melt intercalation nanocomposites did not achieve as high a reinforcement as the aerosilica silicone hybrid, but the nanocomposite formed from solution had a nearly identical reinforcing effect on tensile strength as the aerosilica composite. [Pg.667]

In 1984, Tench and White (3) actually deposited composite structures with layer thickness periods down to hundreds of angstroms. Their nanocomposites exhibited increased tensile strength due to the harder Ni layers in a softer Cu matrix. The layers were not thin enough, however, to obtain enhancements witnessed in systems (non-electrodeposited) with layer thickness periods in the range 10 to 30 A. [Pg.291]

The X-ray diffraction peaks observed in the range of 3°-10° for the modified clays disappear in the rubber nanocomposites. photographs show predominantly exfoliation of the clays in the range of 12 4 nm in the BIMS. Consequently, excellent improvement in mechanical properties like tensile strength, elongation at break, and modulus is observed by the incorporation of the nanoclays in the BIMS. Maiti and Bhowmick have also studied the effect of solution concentration (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 wt%) on the properties of fluorocarbon clay nanocomposites [64]. They noticed that optimum properties are achieved at 20 wt% solution. At the optimized solution concentration, they also prepared rubber/clay nanocomposites by a solution mixing process using fluoroelastomer and different nanoclays (namely NA, 10A, 20A, and 30B) and the effect of these nanoclays on the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites has been reported, as shown in Table 4 [93]. [Pg.30]

Choudhury et al. [86] have studied the effect of polymer-solvent and clay-solvent interaction on the mechanical properties of the HNBR/sepiolite nanocomposites. They chose nine different sets of solvent composition and found that chloroform/methyl ethyl ketone (Qi/MEK) (i.e., HNBR dissolved in Ch and sepio-lite dissolved in MEK) is the best solvent combination for improvement in mechanical properties. XRD, AFM, , and UV-vis spectroscopy studies show that the dispersion of clay is best in the Ch/MEK solvent combination and hence polymer-filler interaction is also the highest. images shown in Fig. 14a, b clearly elucidate the aforementioned phenomena. Consequently, the tensile strength and modulus are found to be higher (5.89 MPa and 1.50 MPa, respectively) for the Ch/MEK system due to the minimum difference in interaction parameter of HNBR-solvent (xab) and sepiolite-solvent (Xcd)- Choudhury et al. have also studied the effect of different nanoclays [NA, , 15A, and sepiolite (SP)] and nanosilica (Aerosil 300) on the mechanical properties of HNBR [36]. The tensile... [Pg.31]

Maji et al. [136] have examined the effect of 30B loading on the mechanical properties of hyperbranched polyurethane (PU) nanocomposites. The extent of clay loading was varied from 2 to 16 phr. The nanocomposite containing 8 wt% 30B clay shows a 100% increase in the tensile strength as compared to unmodi-fied-clay-filled samples. Above 8 wt% clay loading, the mechanical properties decrease. The efficiency and good dispersion of 30B in the hyperbranched PU40... [Pg.32]

The incorporation of unmodified and organically modified montmorillonite nanoclays (namely 15A and 30B) in chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) by the solution intercalation method and their influence on mechanical properties of the nanocomposites have been studied by Kar et al. [137]. The o-MMT-embedded nanocomposites show enhanced tensile strength and Young s modulus in comparison to the nanocomposites containing the unmodified nanoclay. They have shown from and XRD analyses that organically modified clay shows better dispersion in the CPE matrix. This has been further substantiated from FTIR analysis, which proves an interaction between the CPE matrix and the clay intercalates. [Pg.34]

The effect of the microstructure of acrylic copolymer/terpolymer on the properties of silica-based nanocomposites prepared by the sol-gel technique using TEOS has been further studied by Patel et al. [144]. The composites demonstrate superior tensile strength and tensile modulus with increasing proportion of TEOS up to a certain level. At a particular TEOS concentration, the tensile properties improve with increasing hydrophilicity of the polymer matrix and acrylic acid modification. [Pg.35]

In order to understand the relationship between the difference in the interaction parameter of rubber-solvent (Xab) and clay-solvent (xcd) systems and the properties of HNBR/SP nanocomposites, the plots of modulus at 100% elongation and tensile strength versus Xab-Xcd are represented in Fig. 45a, b. An exponential decay in both modulus and tensile strength is observed with the increase in difference of interaction parameter. 7) and 7max follow the same trend as above. [Pg.74]

Polymer nanocomposites with medium density polyethylene were reported with a variety of fluorinated and un-fluorinated nanotubes (37). The nanocomposites consisting of 1 wt% F-SWNT-C H (fluorinated and surface treated nanotubes) nanotubes showed an increase in tensile strength by 52.4%, modulus by 15.9% and elongation by 18.9% as compared to the pure polymer. The composites with 1 wt% F-SWNT-CnH23 (fluorinated and surface treated nanotubes) had an increase of 28.3% in modulus as compared to the pure polymer. The tensile strength also increased from 4.33 MPa for the pure polymer to 5.01 Mpa for the nanocomposite, the elongation at... [Pg.27]

Nanocomposites Modulus at 100% elongation, MPa Tensile strength, MPa Tear strength, kN/m2 Elongation at break, % Hardness, Shore A... [Pg.33]

In the epoxy nanocomposites containing untreated as well as maleic anhydride grafted nanotubes (51), the tensile strength was observed to increase by 50% at 1 wt% of the modified nanotubes, whereas the untreated nanotubes led to only a slight increase in the tensile strength which subsequently decreased on further addition of these pristine nanotubes. The tensile modulus of the nanocomposites was observed... [Pg.33]


See other pages where Tensile strength nanocomposites is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.798]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 , Pg.92 , Pg.93 ]




SEARCH



Nanocomposites strength

Tensil strength

© 2024 chempedia.info