Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature macroscopic property

The correct treatment of boundaries and boundary effects is crucial to simulation methods because it enables macroscopic properties to be calculated from simulations using relatively small numbers of particles. The importance of boundary effects can be illustrated by considering the following simple example. Suppose we have a cube of volume 1 litre which is filled with water at room temperature. The cube contains approximately 3.3 X 10 molecules. Interactions with the walls can extend up to 10 molecular diameters into the fluid. The diameter of the water molecule is approximately 2.8 A and so the number of water molecules that are interacting with the boundary is about 2 x 10. So only about one in 1.5 million water molecules is influenced by interactions with the walls of the container. The number of particles in a Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics simulation is far fewer than 10 -10 and is frequently less than 1000. In a system of 1000 water molecules most, if not all of them, would be within the influence of the walls of the boundary. Clecirly, a simulation of 1000 water molecules in a vessel would not be an appropriate way to derive bulk properties. The alternative is to dispense with the container altogether. Now, approximately three-quarters of the molecules would be at the surface of the sample rather than being in the bulk. Such a situation would be relevcUit to studies of liquid drops, but not to studies of bulk phenomena. [Pg.331]

The systems of interest in chemical technology are usually comprised of fluids not appreciably influenced by surface, gravitational, electrical, or magnetic effects. For such homogeneous fluids, molar or specific volume, V, is observed to be a function of temperature, T, pressure, P, and composition. This observation leads to the basic postulate that macroscopic properties of homogeneous PPIT systems at internal equiUbrium can be expressed as functions of temperature, pressure, and composition only. Thus the internal energy and the entropy are functions of temperature, pressure, and composition. These molar or unit mass properties, represented by the symbols U, and S, are independent of system size and are intensive. Total system properties, J and S do depend on system size and are extensive. Thus, if the system contains n moles of fluid, = nAf, where Af is a molar property. Temperature... [Pg.486]

The fluid is regarded as a continuum, and its behavior is described in terms of macroscopic properties such as velocity, pressure, density and temperature, and their space and time derivatives. A fluid particle or point in a fluid is die smallest possible element of fluid whose macroscopic properties are not influenced by individual molecules. Figure 10-1 shows die center of a small element located at position (x, y, z) with die six faces labelled N, S, E, W, T, and B. Consider a small element of fluid with sides 6x, 6y, and 6z. A systematic account... [Pg.787]

Now we can give a complete statement about recognizing equilibrium equilibrium is recognized by the constancy of macroscopic properties in a closed system at a uniform temperature. [Pg.144]

Thermodynamic, statistical This discipline tries to compute macroscopic properties of materials from more basic structures of matter. These properties are not necessarily static properties as in conventional mechanics. The problems in statistical thermodynamics fall into two categories. First it involves the study of the structure of phenomenological frameworks and the interrelations among observable macroscopic quantities. The secondary category involves the calculations of the actual values of phenomenology parameters such as viscosity or phase transition temperatures from more microscopic parameters. With this technique, understanding general relations requires only a model specified by fairly broad and abstract conditions. Realistically detailed models are not needed to un-... [Pg.644]

On the continuum level of gas flow, the Navier-Stokes equation forms the basic mathematical model, in which dependent variables are macroscopic properties such as the velocity, density, pressure, and temperature in spatial and time spaces instead of nf in the multi-dimensional phase space formed by the combination of physical space and velocity space in the microscopic model. As long as there are a sufficient number of gas molecules within the smallest significant volume of a flow, the macroscopic properties are equivalent to the average values of the appropriate molecular quantities at any location in a flow, and the Navier-Stokes equation is valid. However, when gradients of the macroscopic properties become so steep that their scale length is of the same order as the mean free path of gas molecules,, the Navier-Stokes model fails because conservation equations do not form a closed set in such situations. [Pg.97]

Transport properties are often given a short treatment or a treatment too theoretical to be very relevant. The notion that molecules move when driven by some type of concentration gradient is a practical and easily grasped approach. The mathematics can be minimized. Perhaps the most important feature of the kinetic theory of gases is the recognition that macroscopic properties such as pressure and temperature can be derived by suitable averages of the properties of individual molecules. This concept is an important precursor to statistical thermodynamics. Moreover, the notion of a distribution function as a general... [Pg.21]

To understand heterogeneous catalysis it is necessary to characterize the surface of the catalyst, where reactants bond and chemical transformations subsequently take place. The activity of a solid catalyst scales directly with the number of exposed active sites on the surface, and the activity is optimized by dispersing the active material as nanometer-sized particles onto highly porous supports with surface areas often in excess of 500m /g. When the dimensions of the catalytic material become sufficiently small, the properties become size-dependent, and it is often insufficient to model a catalytically active material from its macroscopic properties. The structural complexity of the materials, combined with the high temperatures and pressures of catalysis, may limit the possibilities for detailed structural characterization of real catalysts. [Pg.98]

A principal theme of this text is the direct relation of macroscopic properties to molecular structure. In concluding the discussion on the si and sll cavity size ratios, two examples are given of how macroscopic engineering properties (equilibrium pressure and temperature, and heat of dissociation) are determined by the size ratios in Table 2.4. [Pg.77]

The second example of microscopic structure reflected in macroscopic properties is almost as important as determining phase equilibria conditions. After establishing that hydrates will form (or dissociate) at certain pressure and temperature conditions, engineers are often interested in the amount of energy required for the phase transition. [Pg.80]

The method presented in this chapter serves as a link between molecular properties (e.g., cavities and their occupants as measured by diffraction and spectroscopy) and macroscopic properties (e.g., pressure, temperature, and density as measured by pressure guages, thermocouples, etc.) As such Section 5.3 includes a brief overview of molecular simulation [molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC)] methods which enable calculation of macroscopic properties from microscopic parameters. Chapter 2 indicated some results of such methods for structural properties. In Section 5.3 molecular simulation is shown to predict qualitative trends (and in a few cases quantitative trends) in thermodynamic properties. Quantitative simulation of kinetic phenomena such as nucleation, while tenable in principle, is prevented by the capacity and speed of current computers however, trends may be observed. [Pg.258]

We arrive at this conclusion from the lack of more than a slight atropisomeric excess (ca. 0.1% in all but one anomalous experiment) after equilibration of racemic BN in the cholesteric phases at several temperatures (TablelV). The lack of change in the ratio of atropisomers in the cholesteric phases is consistent with our observation that liquid-crystal induced circular dichroism spectra (67) of ISN in cholesteric mixture D are due to a macroscopic property of the solvent the LCICD spectra disappear when mixture D is heated to an isotropic temperature. [Pg.161]

The grand canonical ensemble is appropriate for adsorption systems, in which the adsorbed phase is in equilibrium with the gas at some specified temperature. The use of a computer simulation allows us to calculate average macroscopic properties directly without having to explicitly calculate the partition function. The grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) method as applied in this work has been described in detail earlier (55). The aspects involving binary fluid mixtures have been described previously in our Xe-Ar work (30). [Pg.340]

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the four conceptually different paths (the heavy lines) one may utilize to attack the phase-coexistence problem. Each figure depicts a configuration space spanned by two macroscopic properties (such as energy, density. ..) the contours link macrostates of equal probability, for some given conditions c (such as temperature, pressure. ..). The two mountaintops locate the equilibrium macro states associated with the two competing phases, under these conditions. They are separated by a probability ravine (free-energy barrier). In case (a) the path comprises two disjoint sections confined to each of the two phases and terminating in appropriate reference macrostates. In (b) the path skirts the ravine. In (c) it passes through the ravine. In (d) it leaps the ravine. Figure 2. Schematic representation of the four conceptually different paths (the heavy lines) one may utilize to attack the phase-coexistence problem. Each figure depicts a configuration space spanned by two macroscopic properties (such as energy, density. ..) the contours link macrostates of equal probability, for some given conditions c (such as temperature, pressure. ..). The two mountaintops locate the equilibrium macro states associated with the two competing phases, under these conditions. They are separated by a probability ravine (free-energy barrier). In case (a) the path comprises two disjoint sections confined to each of the two phases and terminating in appropriate reference macrostates. In (b) the path skirts the ravine. In (c) it passes through the ravine. In (d) it leaps the ravine.
The parameters of the JT distortions were calculated by the X -method for a series of crystals in good agreement with experimental melting temperatures [14]. The details of the theory and specific calculations seemingly require additional refinements, but the main idea of the JT origin of the liquid-crystal phase transition seems to be quite reasonable. This work thus makes an important next step toward a better understanding of the relation between the macroscopic property of SB and the microscopic electronic structure, the JT effect parameters. [Pg.12]

Theoretical models based on first principles, such as Langmuir s adsorption model, help us understand what is happening at the catalyst surface. However, there is (still) no substitute for empirical evidence, and most of the papers published on heterogeneous catalysis include a characterization of surfaces and surface-bound species. Chemists are faced with a plethora of characterization methods, from micrometer-scale particle size measurement, all the way to angstrom-scale atomic force microscopy [77]. Some methods require UHV conditions and room temperature, while others work at 200 bar and 750 °C. Some methods use real industrial catalysts, while others require very clean single-crystal model catalysts. In this book, I will focus on four main areas classic surface characterization methods, temperature-programmed techniques, spectroscopy and microscopy, and analysis of macroscopic properties. For more details on the specific methods see the references in each section, as well as the books by Niemantsverdriet [78] and Thomas [79]. [Pg.146]


See other pages where Temperature macroscopic property is mentioned: [Pg.250]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.832]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.2336]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.261]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Macroscopic properties

© 2024 chempedia.info