Surfactant solutions formation

Worm-Like Micelles in Diluted Mixed Surfactant Solutions Formation and Rheological Behavior... 

This S3nnposium includes two overview invited lectures by Professor J. J. Taber on "Enhanced Oil Recovery Past, Present and Future" and Professor H. F. Eicke on "Aggregation in Surfactant Solutions Formation and Properties of Micelles and Micro-... 

Rutland M W and Parker J L 1994 Surface forces between silica surfaces in cationic surfactant solutions adsorption and bilayer formation at normal and high pH Langmuir 0 1110-21... 

Critical Micelle Concentration. The rate at which the properties of surfactant solutions vary with concentration changes at the concentration where micelle formation starts. Surface and interfacial tension, equivalent conductance (50), dye solubilization (51), iodine solubilization (52), and refractive index (53) are properties commonly used as the basis for methods of CMC determination. 

In a detersive system containing a dilute surfactant solution and a substrate bearing a soHd polar sod, the first effect is adsorption of surfactant at the sod—bath interface. This adsorption is equivalent to the formation of a thin layer of relatively concentrated surfactant solution at the interface, which is continuously renewable and can penetrate the sod phase. Osmotic flow of water and the extmsion of myelin forms foHows the penetration, with ultimate formation of an equdibrium phase. This equdibrium phase may be microemulsion rather than Hquid crystalline, but in any event it is fluid and flushable... 

Mass-action model of surfactant micelle formation was used for development of the conceptual retention model in micellar liquid chromatography. The retention model is based upon the analysis of changing of the sorbat microenvironment in going from mobile phase (micellar surfactant solution, containing organic solvent-modifier) to stationary phase (the surfactant covered surface of the alkyl bonded silica gel) according to equation ... 

Solubilizing activity are also used in enhanced oil recovery. Tar and extremely viscous hydrocarbons are recovered by the injection of an aqueous solution of an anionic orthophosphate ester surfactant into a petroleum formation, retaining the surfactant in the formation for about 24 h, and displacing the solubilized hydrocarbons toward a recovery well. The surfactant forms an oil microemulsion with the hydrocarbons in the formation. An anionic monoorthophosphate ester surfactant which is a free acid of an organic phosphate ester was dissolved in water. The input of surfactant solution was 2-25% of the pore volume of the formation [250]. To produce a concentrate for the manufacture... 

Optimizing the formulation of micellar surfactant solutions used for enhanced oil recovery consists of obtaining interfacial tensions as low as possible in multiphase systems, which can be achieved by mixing the injected solution with formation fluids. The solubilization of hydrocarbons by the micellar phases of such systems is linked directly to the interfacial efficiency of surfactants. Numerous research projects have shown that the amount of hydrocarbons solubilized by the surfactant is generally as great as the interfacial tension between the micellar phase and the hydrocarbons. The solubilization of crude oils depends strongly on their chemical composition [155]. 

Dimitrios Maroudas, Modeling of Radical-Surface Interactions in the Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon Thin Films Sanat Kumar, M. Antonio Floriano, and Athanassiors Z. Panagiotopoulos, Nanostructured Formation and Phase Separation in Surfactant Solutions Stanley I. Sandler, Amadeu K. Sum, and Shiang-Tai Lin, Some Chemical Engineering Applications of Quantum Chemical Calculations... 

An aqueous dispersion of a disperse dye contains an equilibrium distribution of solid dye particles of various sizes. Dyeing takes place from a saturated solution, which is maintained in this state by the presence of undissolved particles of dye. As dyeing proceeds, the smallest insoluble particles dissolve at a rate appropriate to maintain this saturated solution. Only the smallest moieties present, single molecules and dimers, are capable of becoming absorbed by cellulose acetate or polyester fibres. A recent study of three representative Cl Disperse dyes, namely the nitrodiphenylamine Yellow 42 (3.49), the monoazo Red 118 (3.50) and the anthraquinone Violet 26 (3.51), demonstrated that aggregation of dye molecules dissolved in aqueous surfactant solutions does not proceed beyond dimerisation. The proportion present as dimers reached a maximum at a surfactant dye molar ratio of 2 5 for all three dyes, implying the formation of mixed dye-surfactant micelles [52]. 

LDAO/SDS Interaction. Mixing of cationic and anionic surfactant solutions results In the formation of a mixed species that Is more surface active than the Individual species. The enhanced synergistic effect has been explained (2,3) by showing that a close-packed adsorption of electroneutral R R takes place (R" " and R represent the long chain cation and anion respectively). In the case of Ci2 and C14-DAO, a 1 1 LDAO/SDS molar ratio produces a minimum In surface tension and Is accompanied by an Increase In pH In the bulk solution the association seems to be of the type R R", and the absence of visible precipitate may be attributed to the solubilization of the R R" complex In the solution. In the region where LDAO Is In excess, the structure Is probably [cationic (LDAOH ) anionic (SDS)] nonlonlc (LDAO), while [cationic (LDAOH anionic (SDS)] anionic (SDS) Is formed when SDS Is In excess. Equal molar concentration results In cationic (LDAOH ) anionic (SDS) complex which should favor precipitation. However, at pH >9, there Is no Indication of precipitation (even when the total solute concentration Is 0.35 M). When the pH Is below 9, then precipitation will take place. 

The formation of mixed micelles in surfactant solutions which contain two or more surfactant components can be significantly affected by the structures of the surfactants involved. The observed critical micelle concentration (cmc) is often significantly lower than would be expected based on the erne s of the pure surfactants. This clearly demonstrates that interactions between different surfactant components in the mixed micelles are taking place. 

Micelle formation effects the conductance of Surfactant solutions. The Reason ... 

Except for some anionic/cationic surfactant mixtures which form ion pairs, in a typical surfactant solution, the concentration of the surfactant components as monomeric species is so dilute that no significant interactions between surfactant monomers occur. Therefore, the monomer—mi celle equilibria is dictated by the tendency of the surfactant components to form micelles and the interaction between surfactants in the micelle. Prediction of monomer—micelle equilibria reduces to modeling of the thermodynamics of mixed micelle formation. 

The cloud point of a mixture of nonionic surfactants is intermediate between the pure nonionic surfactants involved (95.99) The cloud point of a dilute nonionic surfactant solution increases upon addition of ionic surfactant (95.98—104). The coacervate phase forms because of attractive forces between the micelles in solution. The incorporation of ionic surfactant into the nonionic micelles introduces electrostatic repulsion between micelles, causing coacervate phase formation to be hindered, raising the cloud point. 

---