Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces assessment methods

Classical Surface Assessment Methods, Contact Angle Measurements" ... [Pg.238]

In addition to the efflux method, several experiments have been performed by means of an inverse GPC method to assess the capsule permeability. Such measurements are considered to be more accurate and representative for high molecular weight species since they are not sensitive to protein adsorption on the capsule surface. This method, however, cannot be used for a massive screening of capsule permeability due to its time requirements. [Pg.59]

One of the standard surface science methods for assessing the concentration and stability of a chemisorbed species is thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS). An early paper by Redhead ( 7) developed the conceptual framework for certain cases. Many papers since then have expanded the applicability of this method. Recent work of Madix Q8) > Weinberg (9) and Schmidt CIO) is particularly noteworthy. Most of this work focuses on the desorption of a single molecular species and not on reactions in desorbing systems. However, qualitative features of the temperature dependence of reactions can be assessed using this method. Figures 1 and 2 taken from the... [Pg.34]

BS 1134, Part 1 1988. Assessment of surface texture, Methods and instrumentation. [Pg.107]

It is of prime importance to establish the assessment method relevant to the expected clinical application of biomaterials when they are to be studied for improvement of the surface blood compatibility. A large hurdle preventing... [Pg.350]

Finally the caveat is repeated that surfaces are not necessarily inert to these various characterization techniques, in order to assess methodical surface modifications, applying more than one technique for a given sample is recommended. [Pg.52]

For the sake of completeness it is noted that many of the surface characterization methods treated in sec. 1.2 also apply for assessing porosity. This applies in the first place for atomic force microscopy (AFM), by which. In... [Pg.123]

Hoffman and Hammonds 1994). In addition, standard data distributions have been proposed for a variety of exposure variables, such as age-specific distributions for soil ingestion rates, inhalation rates, body weights, skin surface area, tap water and fish consumption, residential occupancy and occupational tenure, and soil-on-skin adherence (Finley et al. 1994). It should also be pointed out that these techniques can be combined with other advanced risk assessment methods (i.e., PBPK modeling) to further reduce uncertainty in exposure estimates (Cronin et al. 1995 Simon 1997 Nestorov 1999, 2003). [Pg.766]

It is the responsibility of the experimenter to prove that the crystal surface probed by the surface analytical methods truly represents that probed by the high-pressure kinetics. For example, in assessment of structural sensitivity, kinetics on several different single crystals with... [Pg.7]

An electrically heated wire within the flowing stream. The wire provides the hot deposition surface. Changes in the resistance of the wire are a measure of its temperature and for constant experimental conditions therefore, a measure of the fouling on the wire surface. The method has been used for the assessment of potential fouling in crude oil heaters, for milk fouling and for measurement of in situ corrosion. [Pg.489]

P. A. M. Basheer, L. Basheer, Surface treatments for concrete assessment methods and reported performance , Construction and Building Materials, 1997, 11, 413-429. [Pg.248]

The feasibility of employing fluorescent tracers and video imaging analysis to quantify dermal exposure to pesticide applicators has been demonstrated under realistic field conditions. Six workers loaded a tracer with the organophosphate pesticide, diazinon, into air blast sprayers, and conducted normal dormant spraying in pear orchards. They were examined prior to and immediately after the application. UV-A illumination produced fluorescence on the skin surface, and the pattern of exposure was digitized with a video imaging system. Quantifiable levels of tracer were detected beneath cotton coveralls on five workers. The distribution of exposure over the body surface varied widely due to differences in protective clothing use, work practices and environmental conditions. This assessment method produced exposure values at variance with those calculated by the traditional patch technique. [Pg.377]

ASSESSMENT METHOD OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS... [Pg.249]

CEN EN 12274-8.2005. Slurry surfacing - Test methods - Part 8 Visual assessment of defects. Brussels CEN. [Pg.322]

In Chapter 4, Section III, attention was drawn to the Breuer-Robb (53) reactivity series of uncharged water-soluble polymers with anionic surfactants the reactivity followed the sequence PVA < PEO < MeC < PVAc < PPO PVP. Reactivity seemed to increase with increasing hydrophobic nature, and hence surface activity (19), of the polymer. An important implication is that those polymers that are reactive form mixed films at the surface of water when mixed with surfactants. Note that even though Jones (54), the pioneer of the surface tension method to assess interaction between polymer and surfactant in aqueous solution, utilized such measurements as an indicator of interaction in solution, he does not seem to have drawn any inferences of mixed film formation at the air/water interface—or its implications—at least in his early work. [Pg.212]

XPS is a well established surface sensitive method for the analysis of solid materials, allowing the determination of surface composition and the assessment of oxidation state and chemical enviromnent of the different species. In fact, core level XPS is highly sensitive to the chemical environment, i.e. the binding energy may be strongly dependent on the oxidation state of the investigated ion, as well as on the neighbouring atoms. [Pg.125]

Adsorption on high surface area materials, namely sihca gel, zeolites, and activated carbons (ACs) is a well-assessed method for siloxane removal [1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 30, 31, 39-41, 52, 56, 58-66] due to the very large internal surface area (500-1500 m /g) including macropores (pore diameter > 20 nm) and micropores (pore diameter < 20 run). Due to the contanporary presence of siloxanes and H2S in biogas stream several commercial high surface area materials useful for H2S removal can be efficiently employed to reduce siloxanes concentration down to less than 1 ppm. [Pg.158]

The above comments are seen to be reinforced by observations on the failure path in joints before and after environmental attack. The locus of joint failure of adhesive joints when initially prepared is usually by cohesive fracture in the adhesive layer, or possibly in the substrate materials. However, a classic symptom of environmental attack is that, after such attack, the joints exhibit some degree of apparently interfacial failure between the substrate (or primer) and the substrate. The extent of such apparently interfacial attack increases with time of exposure to the hostile environment. In many instances environmental attack is not accompanied by gross corrosion and the substrates appear clean and in a pristine condition, whilst in other instances the substrates may be heavily corroded. However, as will be shown later, first appearances may be deceptive. For example, to determine whether the failure path is truly at the interface, or whether it is in the oxide layer, or in a boundary layer of the adhesive or primer (if present), requires the use of modern surface analytical methods one cannot rely simply upon a visual assessment. Also, the presence of corrosion on the failed surfaces does not necessarily imply that it was a key aspect in the mechanism of environmental attack. In many instances, corrosion only occurs once the intrinsic adhesion forces at the adhesive/substrate interface, or the oxide layer itself, have failed due the ingressing liquid the substrate surface is now exposed and a liquid electrolyte is present so that post-failure corrosion of the substrate may now result. [Pg.662]


See other pages where Surfaces assessment methods is mentioned: [Pg.238]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.1117]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.984]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.77]   


SEARCH



Method assessment

Surface method

© 2024 chempedia.info