Interfacial, attack

From the foregoing discussion interfacial attack(8) is clearly the most damaging action, but adhesive plasticisation also has a profound effect on joint performance. 

The above comments are seen to be reinforced by observations on the failure path in joints before and after environmental attack. The locus of joint failure of adhesive joints when initially prepared is usually by cohesive fracture in the adhesive layer, or possibly in the substrate materials. However, a classic symptom of environmental attack is that, after such attack, the joints exhibit some degree of apparently interfacial failure between the substrate (or primer) and the substrate. The extent of such apparently interfacial attack increases with time of exposure to the hostile environment. In many instances environmental attack is not accompanied by gross corrosion and the substrates appear clean and in a pristine condition, whilst in other instances the substrates may be heavily corroded. However, as will be shown later, first appearances may be deceptive. For example, to determine whether the failure path is truly at the interface, or whether it is in the oxide layer, or in a boundary layer of the adhesive or primer (if present), requires the use of modern surface analytical methods one cannot rely simply upon a visual assessment. Also, the presence of corrosion on the failed surfaces does not necessarily imply that it was a key aspect in the mechanism of environmental attack. In many instances, corrosion only occurs once the intrinsic adhesion forces at the adhesive/substrate interface, or the oxide layer itself, have failed due the ingressing liquid the substrate surface is now exposed and a liquid electrolyte is present so that post-failure corrosion of the substrate may now result. 

The major unknown in the cathodic delamination process is the mechanism by which the interfacial bond is broken. Alkaline attack of the polymer, surface energy considerations, and attack of the oxide at the interface have all been proposed, but none of the available evidence allows an unequivocal answer. 

Failure occurred primarily in the adhesive for up to 5 days exposure in these aging environments. After 5 days, a mixture of failure sites could be identified with more than one interface often exposed on a given sample. This indicated that during extended exposure to humid environments, any non-uniformity or interfacial weakness could be attacked and eventually become the locus of failure. 

NS-300 Membrane. The NS-300 membrane evolved from an effort at North Star to form an interfacial poly(piperazine Isophthala-mide) membrane. Credali and coworkers had demonstrated chlorine-resistant poly(piperazineamide) membranes in the asymmetric form (20). The NS-lOO, NS-200, and PA-300 membranes were all readily attacked by low levels of chlorine in reverse osmosis feedwaters. In the pursuit of a chlorine-resistant, nonbiodegra-dable thin-fiim-composite membrane, our efforts to develop interfaclally formed piperazine isophthalamide and terephthalamide membranes were partially successful in that membranes were made with salt rejections as high as 98 percent in seawater tests. 

The problem of the variation in the surface energies of various crystal facets can be attacked from several points of view. Bravais first noted that those planes of a crystal which were most densely packed and were also separated most distantly from the neighbouring parallel plane were those which appeared most frequently in crystals he noted also that a closely packed surface was usually associated with a wide interplanar distance and vice versa. Later Willard Gibbs indicated that the most stable planes on a growing crystal were those possessing the least interfacial surface energy. 

Leidheiser 9l) has proposed numerous methods of attack which can be used in an attempt to prevent or minimize the corrosion-induced delamination of polymer coatings from metal substrates. All of these methods involve the control of the chemical and physical properties of the interfacial layer between the coating and the metal substrate. Three of these methods are discussed in Sections 6.3.3-6.3.5. 

Immobilization has other advantages it can slow enzyme deactivation by inhibiting protease attack and minimizing shear, interfacial, temperature, or solvent denaturation. As for the scarcity of some potentially very useful enzymes, it may be only a temporary problem. The development of cloning techniques, and probably the very increase in demand will result in lower prices. One spectacular instance is sialyl aldolase (see Table I). Industrial production of this enzyme by the gene-cloned strain of Escherichia coli has been reported.1,2 Sialylaldolase is now available from Toyobo at a moderate price. 

Hua et al. (1995) proposed a supercritical water region in addition to two reaction regions such as the gas phase in the center of a collapsing cavitation bubble and a thin shell of superheated liquid surrounding the vapor phase. Chemical transformations are initiated predominantly by pyrolysis at the bubble interface or in the gas phase and attack by hydroxyl radicals generated from the decomposition of water. Depending on its physical properties, a molecule can simultaneously or sequentially react in both the gas and interfacial liquid regions. 

For a few years after the development of the first interfacial composite membranes, it was believed that the amine portion of the reaction chemistry had to be polymeric to obtain good membranes. This is not the case, and the monomeric amines, piperazine and phenylenediamine, have been used to form membranes with very good properties. Interfacial composite membranes based on urea or amide bonds are subject to degradation by chlorine attack, but the rate of degradation of the membrane is slowed significantly if tertiary aromatic amines are used and the membranes are highly crosslinked. Chemistries based on all-aromatic or piperazine structures are moderately chlorine tolerant and can withstand very low level exposure to chlorine for prolonged periods or exposure to ppm levels... 

Sterilization of a membrane system is also required to control bacterial growth. For cellulose acetate membranes, chlorination of the feed water is sufficient to control bacteria. Feed water to polyamide or interfacial composite membranes need not be sterile, because these membranes are usually fairly resistant to biological attack. Periodic shock disinfection using formaldehyde, peroxide or peracetic acid solutions as part of a regular cleaning schedule is usually enough to prevent biofouling. 

The question of trace ionic contaminants is often overlooked. There is no doubt, however, that trace ions initially present in the polymer or subsequently introduced during the manufacturing process can wreak havoc with the device as well as with device-mounted components as the device ages and the ions migrate. Thus, not only can Na ions migrate to and destroy an FET by lowering the threshold resistance in the gate, halide ions can attack some metals, which may lead to a loss of interfacial adhesion and will certainly lead to a loss of conduction. 

---