Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intrinsic adhesion

The morphological variance appears more important with chrysotile than with amphiboles. The intrinsic stmcture of chrysotile, its higher flexibiUty, and interfibnl adhesion (10) allow a variety of intermediate shapes when fiber aggregates are subjected to mechanical shear. Amphibole fibers are generally more britde and accommodate less morphological deformation during mechanical treatment. [Pg.349]

The van der Waals and other non-covalent interactions are universally present in any adhesive bond, and the contribution of these forces is quantified in terms of two material properties, namely, the surface and interfacial energies. The surface and interfacial energies are macroscopic intrinsic material properties. The surface energy of a material, y, is the energy required to create a unit area of the surface of a material in a thermodynamically reversible manner. As per the definition of Dupre [14], the surface and interfacial properties determine the intrinsic or thermodynamic work of adhesion, W, of an interface. For two identical surfaces in contact ... [Pg.77]

Viscoelastic polymers essentially dominate the multi-billion dollar adhesives market, therefore an understanding of their adhesion behavior is very important. Adhesion of these materials involves quite a few chemical and physical phenomena. As with elastic materials, the chemical interactions and affinities in the interface provide the fundamental link for transmission of stress between the contacting bodies. This intrinsic resistance to detachment is usually augmented several folds by dissipation processes available to the viscoelastic media. The dissipation processes can have either a thermodynamic origin such as recoiling of the stretched polymeric chains upon detachment, or a dynamic and rate-sensitive nature as in chain pull-out, chain disentanglement and deformation-related rheological losses in the bulk of materials and in the vicinity of interface. [Pg.122]

Mangipudi et al. [63,88] reported some initial measurements of adhesion strength between semicrystalline PE surfaces. These measurements were done using the SFA as a function of contact time. Interestingly, these data (see Fig. 22) show that the normalized pull-off energy, a measure of intrinsic adhesion strength is increased with time of contact. They suggested the amorphous domains in PE could interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. Falsafi et al. [37] also used the JKR technique to study the effect of composition on the adhesion of elastomeric acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives. The model PSA they used was a crosslinked network of random copolymers of acrylates and acrylic acid, with an acrylic acid content between 2 and 10%. [Pg.131]

As is true for macroscopic adhesion and mechanical testing experiments, nanoscale measurements do not a priori sense the intrinsic properties of surfaces or adhesive junctions. Instead, the measurements reflect a combination of interfacial chemistry (surface energy, covalent bonding), mechanics (elastic modulus, Poisson s ratio), and contact geometry (probe shape, radius). Furthermore, the probe/sample interaction may not only consist of elastic deformations, but may also include energy dissipation at the surface and/or in the bulk of the sample (or even within the measurement apparatus). Study of rate-dependent adhesion and mechanical properties is possible with both nanoindentation and... [Pg.193]

Thus this adhesion hysteresis is a result of a time-dependent roughening of the interface. It shows that roughness at an interface may actually develop as a result of bringing the two phases together as a result of the intrinsic properties of the surface molecules. [Pg.341]

Some rubber base adhesives need vulcanization to produce adequate ultimate strength. The adhesion is mainly due to chemical interactions at the interface. Other rubber base adhesives (contact adhesives) do not necessarily need vulcanization but rather adequate formulation to produce adhesive joints, mainly with porous substrates. In this case, the mechanism of diffusion dominates their adhesion properties. Consequently, the properties of the elastomeric adhesives depend on both the variety of intrinsic properties in natural and synthetic elastomers, and the modifying additives which may be incorporated into the adhesive formulation (tackifiers, reinforcing resins, fillers, plasticizers, curing agents, etc.). [Pg.573]

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1, 128 Interfacial inhibition, 159 Intrinsic activity, 44-46 Intrinsic efficacy, 9, 45, 115 Inverse agonism, 49, 108 Inverse agonists... [Pg.296]

AQPO, formerly known as the Major Intrinsic Protein of 26 kDa (MDP26), is specifically expressed in the plasma membrane of eye lens fiber cells. It transports water to a low degree, but has also been implicated in cell adhesion and gap junction formation. Its main role is to maintain the transparency of the lens by maintaining a tight cellular connection to neighboring cells and/or by controlling the fluid circulation. [Pg.215]

Sticky, one of our earliest childhood experiences and probably one of the first words to enter our vocabulary, is familiar to scientists and nonscientists alike. However, does our direct experience of stickiness, or scientifically speaking, adhesion, have any relevance at the nanoscale How can adhesion be measnred, how can it be manipulated, and what role does it play both in technological applications and intrinsically in nature These are the questions that I will try to address in this chapter. [Pg.17]

The process of viscoelastic braking just described has certain parallels with the dynamic adhesion of elastomers. When, for example, a rubber strip is peeled from a rigid substrate, the effective, or apparent, work of adhesion, W, is usually much greater than the intrinsic, or reversible, energy of adhesion, Wq, given by the Dupre equation [15] ... [Pg.290]

In order to accurately determine the locus of failure of adhesion systems, the chemisti y of the fracture surfaces must be analyzed using surface-sensitive characterization techniques. Many surface analysis techniques are presently available and each technique is based on an intrinsic property of the surface atoms or molecules. Lee155 , Czanderna 156) and Park 157) have reviewed these techniques. However, they suggest that one be aware that new techniques and applications are continually being introduced. [Pg.62]


See other pages where Intrinsic adhesion is mentioned: [Pg.348]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.1051]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.885]    [Pg.174]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.77 , Pg.78 , Pg.79 , Pg.80 , Pg.81 , Pg.82 , Pg.83 , Pg.84 ]




SEARCH



Interfacial contact and intrinsic adhesion

Intrinsic adhesive fracture energy

Intrinsic adhesive fracture energy values

© 2024 chempedia.info