Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface analytical methods, comparative

Most organic compounds occur at extremely low concentrations in seawater. Their determination involves an extraction/sorption step to increase their concentration levels to the sensitivity range of instrumental analytical methods. Compared with other groups of analytes, the risk of adsorptive losses is most important for trace organic compounds. Hierefore, techniques are preferable which involve direct extraction within the sampler or in situ enrichment onto solid adsorbents. Using very large samplers with a comparably high ratio between volume and internal sampler surface, adsorption losses can be minimized but never excluded entirely. [Pg.14]

By systematic variation of the chemical composition of these solutions and by applying surface analytical methods, unique information can be obtained from O Is (Fig. 9-41) and Fe 2p3/2 (Fig. 9-42) XPS spectra of the surface layer formed on the test specimens. Comparative analysis of the iron and oxygen spectra proved that HEDP of 10" M, and partly of 10 M concentration, causes a striking decrease in Fe-0 and an increase in the metallic iron ratio. At 10 M concentration, which is the optimal concentration of the protective inhibition effect, the Fe-0 content is 10 times as high as... [Pg.523]

The types of intrinsic dissolution profiles obtainable through the loose powder and constant surface area methods are shown in Fig. 19. Oxy-phenbutazone was obtained as the crystalline anhydrate and monohydrate forms, with the monohydrate being the less soluble [129]. The loose powder dissolution profiles consisted of sharp initial increases, which gradually leveled off as the equilibrium solubility was reached. In the absence of supporting information, the solubility difference between the two species cannot be adequately understood until equilibrium solubility conditions are reached. In addition, the shape of the data curves is not amenable to quantitative mathematical manipulation. The advantage of the constant surface area method is evident in that its dissolution profiles are linear with time, and more easily compared. Additional information about the relative surface areas or particle size distributions of the two materials is not required, since these differences were eliminated when the analyte disc was prepared. [Pg.366]

Chromium compounds Cr203 surface scale Nickel- chromium—iron alloys Nickel-chromium— molybdenum (tungsten) alloys Ni-Cr alloys analytical methods, 6 502-514 composition of metal compared to chromium ferroalloys, 6 501t dispersoid former, 2 325, 327 disposal, 6 519-521 economic aspects, 6 496—500 effect on cobalt alloys, 7 220 effect on stainless steel corrosion resistance, 7 809... [Pg.182]

In this chapter we introduce high resolution diffraction studies of materials, beginning from the response of a perfect crystal to a plane wave, namely the Bragg law and rocking curves. We compare X-rays with electrons and neutrons for materials characterisation, and we compare X-rays with other surface analytic techniques. We discuss the definition and purpose of high resolution X-ray diffraction and topographic methods. We also give the basic theory required for initial use of the techniques. [Pg.1]

Trace impurities in noble metal nanoclusters, used for the fabrication of highly oriented arrays on crystalline bacterial surface layers on a substrate for future nanoelectronic applications, can influence the material properties.25 Reliable and sensitive analytical methods are required for fast multi-element determination of trace contaminants in small amounts of high purity platinum or palladium nanoclusters, because the physical, electrical and chemical properties of nanoelectronic arrays (thin layered systems or bulk) can be influenced by impurities due to contamination during device production25 The results of impurities in platinum or palladium nanoclusters measured directly by LA-ICP-MS are compared in Figure 9.5. As a quantification procedure, the isotope dilution technique in solution based calibration was developed as discussed in Chapter 6. [Pg.265]

The modification of the chemical composition of polymer surfaces, and thus their wettability with chemical substances, can be realized in different ways electric discharges more commonly called Corona effect, oxidation by a flame, plasma treatment, UV irradiation and also UV irradiation under ozone atmosphere. Numerous studies have been devoted to the effects of these different treatments. More recently, Strobel et al. [204] compared the effects of these treatments on polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate using analytical methods such as E.S.C.A., F.T.I.R., and contact angle measurements. They demonstrated that a flame oxidizes polymers only superficially (2-3 nm) whereas treatment realized by plasma effect or Corona effect permits one to work deeply in the polymer (10 nm). The combination of UV irradiation with ozone flux modifies the chemical composition of the polymers to a depth much greater than 10 nm, introducing oxygenated functions into the core of the polymer. [Pg.72]

Accuracy / recovery The amount of material recovered from surface, swab or rinse solution compared to accepted reference value. A correction factor should be established in the analytical method to represent incomplete recovery + +... [Pg.354]

It is important to consider the connection between the two types of studies. One often refers to the "pressure gap" that separates vacuum studies of chemisorption and catalysis from commercial catalytic reactions, which generally run above —often well above — atmospheric pressure. There is simply no way to properly simulate high pressure conditions in a surface analysis system. Reactions can be run in an attached reaction chamber, which is then pumped out and the sample transferred, under vacuum, into an analysis system equipped for electron, ion and photon spectroscopies. However, except for some optical and x-ray methods that can be performed in situ, the surface analytical tools are not measuring the system under reaction conditions. This gap is well recognized, and both the low- and high-pressure communities keep it in mind when comparing their results. [Pg.21]


See other pages where Surface analytical methods, comparative is mentioned: [Pg.289]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.203]   


SEARCH



Comparative method

Comparator method

Surface analytical methods

Surface analytical methods, comparative considerations

Surface analytics

Surface method

© 2024 chempedia.info