Supercritical fluid extraction, carbon

The two fluids most often studied in supercritical fluid technology, carbon dioxide and water, are the two least expensive of all solvents. Carbon dioxide is nontoxic, nonflammable, and has a near-ambient critical temperature of 31.1°C. CO9 is an environmentally friendly substitute for organic solvents including chlorocarbons and chloroflu-orocarbons. Supercritical water (T = 374°C) is of interest as a substitute for organic solvents to minimize waste in extraction and reaction processes. Additionally, it is used for hydrothermal oxidation of hazardous organic wastes (also called supercritical water oxidation) and hydrothermal synthesis. 

Adsorption and Desorption Adsorbents may be used to recover solutes from supercritical fluid extracts for example, activated carbon and polymeric sorbents may be used to recover caffeine from CO9. This approach may be used to improve the selectivity of a supercritical fluid extraction process. SCF extraction may be used to regenerate adsorbents such as activated carbon and to remove contaminants from soil. In many cases the chemisorption is sufficiently strong that regeneration with CO9 is limited, even if the pure solute is quite soluble in CO9. In some cases a cosolvent can be added to the SCF to displace the sorbate from the sorbent. Another approach is to use water at elevated or even supercritical temperatures to facilitate desorption. Many of the principles for desorption are also relevant to extraction of substances from other substrates such as natural products and polymers. 

The coupling of supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) with gas chromatography (SEE-GC) provides an excellent example of the application of multidimensional chromatography principles to a sample preparation method. In SEE, the analytical matrix is packed into an extraction vessel and a supercritical fluid, usually carbon dioxide, is passed through it. The analyte matrix may be viewed as the stationary phase, while the supercritical fluid can be viewed as the mobile phase. In order to obtain an effective extraction, the solubility of the analyte in the supercritical fluid mobile phase must be considered, along with its affinity to the matrix stationary phase. The effluent from the extraction is then collected and transferred to a gas chromatograph. In his comprehensive text, Taylor provides an excellent description of the principles and applications of SEE (44), while Pawliszyn presents a description of the supercritical fluid as the mobile phase in his development of a kinetic model for the extraction process (45). 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a technique in which a supercritical fluid [formed when the critical temperature Tf) and critical pressure Pf) for the fluid are exceeded simultaneously] is used as an extraction solvent instead of an organic solvent. By far the most common choice of a supercritical fluid is carbon dioxide (CO2) because CO2 has a low critical temperature (re = 31.1 °C), is inexpensive, and is safe." SFE has the advantage of lower viscosity and improved diffusion coefficients relative to traditional organic solvents. Also, if supercritical CO2 is used as the extraction solvent, the solvent (CO2) can easily be removed by bringing the extract to atmospheric pressure. Supercritical CO2 itself is a very nonpolar solvent that may not have broad applicability as an extraction solvent. To overcome this problem, modifiers such as methanol can be used to increase the polarity of the SFE extraction solvent. Another problem associated with SFE using CO2 is the co-extraction of lipids and other nonpolar interferents. To overcome this problem, a combination of SFE with SPE can be used. Stolker et al." provided a review of several SFE/SPE methods described in the literature. 

To date most of the work which has been done with supercritical fluid extraction has concentrated on the extraction of analytes from solid matrices or liquids supported on an inert solid carrier matrix. The extraction of aqueous matrices presents particular problems [276-278]. The co-extraction of water causes problems with restrictor plugging, column deterioration, and phase separation if a nonpolar solvent is used for sample collection. Also, carbon dioxide isay have limited extraction efficiency for many water soluble compounds. 

On-line SFE-GC finds use especially in petroleum-related applications [54], but has also been applied to polymer additives [47,55]. PBT polymers were extracted at 200 bar and 55 °C for the determination of carbonic acid diphenyl esters and other volatiles, using on-line SFE-GC-MS [47]. Extraction of entrained volatiles is a quality test for some polymers. SFE-GC-FTIR-MS has been employed to reveal the cause of odour of a smelly hose (a plasticiser) [56]. SFE-GC can also profitably be used for the determination of residual solvents in polymers such as benzene, toluene and o-xylene [57]. Oligomers of PE (up to 1000 Da) were determined by GC after supercritical fluid extraction [58]. 

Ashraf-Khorassani M, Taylor LT, Zimmerman P. Nitrous oxide versus carbon dioxide for supercritical fluid extraction and chromatography of amines. Anal. Chem. 1990 62 1177-1180. 

Reindt and Hoffler [50] optimized parameters in the supercritical fluid extraction of polyaromatic hydrocarbons from soil. These workers used carbon dioxide -8% methanol for extraction and obtained 88-101% recovery of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the final high-performance liquid chromatography. 

Supercritical fluid extraction with carbon dioxide has been applied to the determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in soil. 

Fernandez et al. [9] used supercritical fluid extraction combined with ion pair liquid chromatography to determine quaternary ammonium in digested sludges and marine sediments. Carbon dioxide modified with 30% methanol was used as the extractant at an operating pressure of 380atm. Between 0.2 and 3.7g kg-1 surfactant was found in Swiss works effluent sludges, determined with a relative standard deviation of 7%. 

Von Bavel et al. [55] have developed a solid phase carbon trap (PX-21 active carbon) for the simultaneous determination of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans also polychlorobiphenyls and chlorinated insecticides in soils using superfluid extraction liquid chromatography for the final determination. Supercritical fluid extraction with carbon dioxide has been applied to the determination of dioxins in soil [114],... 

As discussed in section 5.6.1.4 a solid phase carbon trap has been used in conjunction with supercritical fluid extraction liquid chromatography for the simultaneous determination of organochlorine insecticides, polychlorobiphenyls, polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans in soils [19]. 

Snyder et al. [20] have compared supercritical fluid extraction with classical sonication and Soxhlet extraction for the extraction of selected pesticides from soils. Samples extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide modified with 3% methanol at 350atm and 50°C gave a =85% recovery of organochlorine insecticides including Dichlorvos, Endrin, Endrin aldehyde, p,p -DDT mirex and decachlorobiphenyl (and organophosphorus insecticides). 

Snyder et al. [94] compared supercritical extraction with classical sonication and Soxhlet extraction for the extraction of selected organophosphorus insecticides from soil. Samples extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide modified with 3% methanol at 350atm and 50°C gave a =85% recovery of Diazinon (diethyl-2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl phosphorothiodate or 0,0 diethyl-0-(2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidyl) phosphorothioate). Ronnel (or Fenchlorphos) 0,0-dimethyl-0-2,4,5 trichlorophenol phosphorothiodate), Parathion ethyl (diethyl-p-nitrophenyl (phosphorothioate), Tetrachlorovinphos (trans,-2-chloro-l-(2,4,5 trichlorophenyl) vinyl (chlorophenyl-O-methylphenyl phosphorothioate) and Methiadathion. Supercritical fluid extraction with methanol modified carbon dioxide has been applied to the determination of organophosphorus insecticides in soil [260]. 

Steinheimer et al. [103] used supercritical fluid chromatography to extract Atrazine, diethyl Atrazine and Cyanazine from Canadian cornbelt soils by supercritical fluid extraction with carbon dioxide. 

The method based on immunosorbents coupled on-line with liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry [109], discussed in section 9.4.2.1, has been applied to the determination of substituted urea type herbicides. Supercritical fluid extraction with methanol modified carbon dioxide has been applied to the determinants of sulfonyl urea herbicides in soil [261],... 

Supercritical fluid extraction is an attractive analytical technique for recovering organic compounds from soils and sediments. Carbon dioxide is... 

Fahing et al. [24] studied the modifier effects in the supercritical fluid extraction of organics from soils and clays. Swelling experiments showed that unmodified carbon dioxide did not cause swelling of the soil whereas carbon dioxide modified with water did cause rapid swelling of soil, thereby facilitating extraction of the organics. 

The first use of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) as an extraction technique was reported by Zosel [379]. Since then there have been many reports on the use of SFE to extract PCBs, phenols, PAHs, and other organic compounds from particulate matter, soils and sediments [362, 363, 380-389]. The attraction of SFE as an extraction technique is directly related to the unique properties of the supercritical fluid [390]. Supercritical fluids, which have been used, have low viscosities, high diffusion coefficients, and low flammabilities, which are all clearly superior to the organic solvents normally used. Carbon dioxide (C02, [362,363]) is the most common supercritical fluid used for SFE, since it is inexpensive and has a low critical temperature (31.3 °C) and pressure (72.2 bar). Other less commonly used fluids include nitrous oxide (N20), ammonia, fluoro-form, methane, pentane, methanol, ethanol, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and dichlorofluoromethane [362, 363, 391]. Most of these fluids are clearly less attractive as solvents in terms of toxicity or as environmentally benign chemicals. Commercial SFE systems are available, but some workers have also made inexpensive modular systems [390]. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (EPA 3540, for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons EPA 3561 for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons) is applicable to the extraction of semivolatile constituents. Supercritical fluid extraction involves heating and pressuring a mobile phase to supercritical conditions (where the solvent has the properties of a gas and a liquid). The supercritical fluid is passed through the soil sample, and the analytes are concentrated on a sorbent or trapped cryogenically. The analytes are eluted with a solvent and analyzed using conventional techniques. Carbon dioxide is the most popular mobile phase. 

Wong, D.C.L. van Compemolle, R. Nowlin, J.G. O Neal, D.L. Johnson, G.M. Use of supercritical fluid extraction and fast ion bombardment mass spectrometry to identify toxic chemicals from a refinery effluent adsorbed onto granular activated carbon. Chemosphere 1996, 32, 621. 

---