Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sulfonamides , detection

Franek, M., I. Diblikova, I. Cernoch, et al. 2006. Broad-specificity immunoassays for sulfonamide detection Immunochemical strategy for generic antibodies and competitors. Anal. Chem. 78 1559-1567. [Pg.182]

In 2008, Carretero et al. described a multi-class method for the analysis of 31 antibacterials (including f)-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, quinolones, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, nitroimidazoles, and trimethoprim) in meat samples by PLE-LC-MS/MS. Meat samples were homogenized and blended with EDTA-washed sand, then extracted with water by applying 1500 psi (Ib/in. ), at 70°C. One extraction cycle was 10 min. A drawback of the method is the large volumes of extracts (40 ml) obtained, which required evaporation to concentrate the extract volume prior to final analysis. This evaporation step considerably increases the time required for sample preparation. The proposed method has been applied to the analysis of 152 samples of cattle and pig tissues, with the presence of quinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides detected in 15% of the samples, although at concentrations below the MRLs. [Pg.131]

SCHEME 14.4 (a) GO/Fe3O4/5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxypheiiyl)porphyrin nanocomposite and (b) sulfonamides detected in tap and river water samples. (Adapted from Ref. [ 125] with permission of Elsevier.)... [Pg.478]

ImmunO lSS iy. Chemiluminescence compounds (eg, acridinium esters and sulfonamides, isoluminol), luciferases (eg, firefly, marine bacterial, Benilla and Varela luciferase), photoproteins (eg, aequorin, Benilld), and components of bioluminescence reactions have been tested as replacements for radioactive labels in both competitive and sandwich-type immunoassays. Acridinium ester labels are used extensively in routine clinical immunoassay analysis designed to detect a wide range of hormones, cancer markers, specific antibodies, specific proteins, and therapeutic dmgs. An acridinium ester label produces a flash of light when it reacts with an alkaline solution of hydrogen peroxide. The detection limit for the label is 0.5 amol. [Pg.275]

The amino group is readily dia2oti2ed in aqueous solution, and this reaction forms a basis for the assay of sulfas. Aldehydes also react to form anils, and the yellow product formed with 4-(dimethylamino)hen2a1dehyde can be used for detection in thiu-layer and paper chromatography. Chromatographic retention values have been deterrnined in a number of thiu layer systems, and have been used as an expression of the lipophilic character of sulfonamides (23). These values have corresponded well with Hansch lipophilic parameters determined in an isobutyl alcohol—water system. [Pg.466]

The detection limits for benzodiazepines, aminobenzophenones and sulfonamides lie in the lower nanogram range. [Pg.225]

The detection limit for amines and sulfonamides lies in the low nanogram range. [Pg.296]

The ZwKKER reaction involving Co salts is frequently used for the detection of barbituric acid derivatives [31-35], but some purine, pyridine and piperidine derivatives and heterocyclic sulfonamides also yield colored derivatives. The Zwkker reaction is particularly sensitive when it is possible to form a tetrahedral complex [Co(Barb)2 Xj] (X = donor ligand, e.g. amine) [4]. [Pg.67]

Sulfonylureas are not directly amenable to gas chromatography (GC) because of their extremely low volatility and thermal instability. GC has been used in conjunction with diazomethane derivatization, pentafluorobenzyl bromide derivatization, and hydrolysis followed by analysis of the aryl sulfonamides. These approaches have not become widely accepted, owing to poor performance for the entire family of sulfonylureas. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has been evaluated for water analysis and soil analysis. The low injection volumes required in CE may not yield the required sensitivity for certain applications. Enzyme immunoassay has been reported for chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron, with a limit of detection (LOD) ranging from 20 to 100 ng kg (ppt) in soil and water. [Pg.400]

Seven replicate recoveries of flucarbazone-sodium, sulfonic acid, sulfonamide and NODT from well water fortified af 50 ng L averaged 106,100,89 and 106%, respec-fively. Therefore, the LOQ is 50 ng L for each analyte. The method detection limits for flucarbazone-sodium, sulfonic acid, sulfonamide and NODT, as determined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recommended technique, are 5, 11, 20 and 19ngL, respectively. [Pg.495]

Test strip and immunoflltration devices were developed by Ostermaier et al to detect sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine, and sulfamethoxypyridazine in milk. Direct competitive immunoassay was utilized with sulfonamide-horseradish peroxidase as the detector. The LOD for sulfamethazine for both the dipstick and immunoflltration was 10 pg kg for sulfadiazine, the LOD was 12 pg kg for the dipstick and 30 pg kg for immunoflltration. For sulfamethoxypyridazine, the LOD was 10 pgkg for the dipstick and 20 pgkg for immunoflltration. The devices were found to be suitable for on-site use with undiluted milk. [Pg.704]

For therapeutic drugs, the highest concentrations in the raw sludge corresponded to the analgesics diclofenac (209 ng g ) and ibuprofen (135 ng g-1), and the sulfonamide antibiotic sulfathiazole (143.0 ng g-1). Next in abundance were the diuretic compounds furosemide (79.9 ng g-1) and hydrochlorothiazide (41.3 ng g-1), and the analgesic ketoprofen (42.4 ng g-1). The remaining PhC were found at concentrations below 40 ng g The list of the 24 detected... [Pg.153]

The bioslurry treatment successfully removed several of the PhC to non-detectable levels after 26 days three histamine H2-receptor antagonists (ranitidine, famotidine, cimetidine), two (1-blockers (atenolol, sotalol), one barbiturate (butalbital) and one antidiabetic compound (glibenclamide). The elimination of the sulfonamide antibiotics sulfapyridine (100%), sulfamethazine (91.0%) and... [Pg.154]

Macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, dehydroerythromycin, etc.) and sulfonamides (sulfamethoxazole, sulfadimethoxine, sulfamethazine, and sulfathi-azole) are the most prevalent antibiotics found in the environment with levels around a few micrograms per liter, whereas fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and penicillins have been detected in fewer cases and usually at low concentrations (nanograms per liter) [3,20,23,72]. This result is not surprising, since penicillins are easily hydrolyzed and tetracyclines readily precipitate with cations such as calcium and are accumulated in sewage sludge or sediments. Several reviews have reported the environmental occurrence of different antibiotics in aquatic and soil compartments. Some of these data are detailed in Table 1. [Pg.199]

Most of the antibodies developed (both monoclonal and polyclonal) only detect individual sulfonamides. However, due to the widespread use of sulfon-... [Pg.214]

As occurred with the other antibiotics, commercial immunoassay formats, also available as kits for tetracyclines and penicillins such as the Parallux, the LacTek, or the Charm II, have also been placed on the market for the analysis of sulfonamides (see Table 4). Thus, the Parallux detects sulfamethazine and sulfadimethoxine in raw milk with a LOD of 10 pg L1. The Charm II detects almost all sulfonamides in honey and milk with a LOD in the range from 1 to 10 pg L, whereas LacTek is able to detect sulfamethazine. Moreover, the 5101SULlp and 5101SUDAlp tests reach LOD values for sulfamethazine and sulfadiazine of around 0.2 pg L 1 and they have been applied to the analysis of urine, milk, and plasma. These tests have proved to be efficient as a point of care for on-site applications on farms. Moreover, commercially available antibodies can be found from several sources such as Silver Lake Research, US Biological, Cortex Biochem. Inc., Accurate Chemical Scientific, Fitzgerald Industries International Inc., and Biotrend Chemikalien GmbH. [Pg.215]

We have found only one attempt to use immunoassays to detect sulfonamides in environmental samples. As in the case of penicillins and tetracyclines and also for fluoroquinolones (see below), Campagnolo et al. [84] measured sulfonamides in water samples proximal to a farm in Iowa using a commercial Charm II RIA test, accomplishing a LOD of 5 pg L 1 for sulfamethazine. [Pg.215]

To further illustrate the diversity of hydrolytic opening reactions, we turn our attention to an isothiazole ring as found in the antipsychotic agent ziprasidone (11.129). This drug is subject to various reactions of oxidation and reduction, but also undergoes hydrolytic cleavage of the C=N bond of the isothiazole ring. Evidence for this reaction was afforded by detection of radioactive metabolite 11.130, a sulfonamide, in the urine of patients dosed... [Pg.733]


See other pages where Sulfonamides , detection is mentioned: [Pg.240]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.940]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.1019]    [Pg.1027]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.73]   


SEARCH



Antibiotics, detection sulfonamides

Sulfonamide detection chromatographic

Sulfonamide detection methods

© 2024 chempedia.info