Complexes tetrahedral

The orbital interactions associated with the tetrahedral geometry are important in both organic and inorganic chemistry. 

The 7T orbitals are challenging to visualize, but if the y axis of the ligand orbitals is chosen along the bond axis, and the x and z axes are arranged to allow the C2 operation to work properly, the results in Table 10.9 are obtained. The redncible representation includes the E,Ti, and T2 irreducible representations. The has no matching metal atom orbitals, E matches and d,c -y2, and T2 matches and dy. The E and T2 interactions lower 

FIGURE 10.18 Orbital Splitting in Octahedral and Tetrahedral Geometries. 

M------ L TT bonding. In cases in which the d orbitals are not fully occupied, a bonding is 

Very little has been reported on substitution reactions of inert complexes in this category. N.m.r. studies on the dissociation of the Ni complexes NiL , 

The iron complexes have a cubane-type stereochemistry with four-co-ordinate Fe and three-co-ordinate S atoms occupying alternate comers of the cube. No detailed kinetic measurements were reported but it is stated that in all cases equilibrium appeared to be established within several minutes or less - implying that not all the 

Several 60-CVE homo- and heteronuclear complexes of general formula [M4 pM v-(CO)i2] (M, M = Fe, Ru, Co, Rh) are known. Their tetrahedral geometry is here exemplified in Fig. 9, which refers to [Co4(CO)i2] and [Co3Ru(CO)i2] , respectively. It is apparent that in both species each metal-metal edge is /z-bridged by a carbonyl group lying in the basal plane. 

The behavior of [Rh4(CO)i2] and [Co2Rh2(CO)i2] is quite similar to that of [Co4(CO)i2] except that their monoanions [Rh4(CO)i2] and [Co2Rh2(CO)i2] are completely unstable. 

The cathodic behavior of the isoelectronic complexes [Co3M(CO)i2] (M = Fe, Ru) is slightly different in that they undergo an irreversible, single-step two-electron reduction.  

The relevant redox potentials are listed in Table 7. It is apparent that progressive substitution of cobalt atoms for rhodium atoms induces a shift towards lower potentials. In addition, comparison with the corresponding [M4(CO)i2] species shows that the strong electron-donating power of the basal tripodal phosphine makes the reductions more difficult by approximately 0.5 V. 

The crystal-structure determination of bis-(5,5-diethylbarbiturato)bisimi-dazolecobalt(n) is the first of a transition-metal complex in which a drug-active barbiturate is a ligand. Each cobalt atom lies on a crystallographic C2 axis and is surrounded by a tetrahedral arrangement of four nitrogen 

C - - O contact of 3.02 A between an imidazole carbon atom a. to both nitrogen atoms and the oxygen atom of a carbonyl group a to the coordinated barbiturate nitrogen atom. The structure of the isomorphous zinc(ii) complex is also described. Crystallographic Cj symmetry is required of the thiocarbamate complex (2), in which the cobalt atom mdubits tetra- 

Structural studies have now been made of a number of polyhedral molecules and ions, and of these the largest class comprises the tetrahedral complexes. 

Most of these are of one of the four types shown in Fig. 3.18(a)-(d), the geometry of which is most easily appreciated if the tetrahedron is shown as four vertices of a cube. Disregarding the singly-attached ligands Y, there is first the simple tetrahedron A4, (a). To this may be added either 4 X atoms situated above the centres of the faces, (b), or 6 X atoms bridging the edges, (c). These X atoms are, of course, 

Although x-ray diffraction (and occasionally measurements of dipole moment) are the least equivocal ways of deciding which of a pair of isomers is the cis and which the trans, these methods cannot be applied easily to most compounds. In some cases structures are assigned on the basis of chemical evidence, generally by studying the conversion of one complex to another. At present, the best picture of the relationship between the structures of reactant and product is that applicable to complexes of dipositive platinum in particular, a number of conclusions may be drawn which are based on the so-called trans effect (Chap. 23). 

Although x-ray evidence has shown that the tetracovalenl complexes formed by Pd(II) and Cu(II) and some of those formed by Ni(II) are also square in configuration, only a small number of complexes of Pd(II) and Ni(II) and none of Cu(II) have been isolated in both cis and trans forms. In solutions containing complexes of Ni(II), Pd(II) and Cu(II), equilibrium conditions tend to be set up rapidly, and generally only the more stable isomer (frequently the trans form) may be isolated. Why this is not also true in solutions containing complexes of Pt(II) is still very much an open question. 

It is interesting that even before x-ray studies proved the planar configuration of the four bonds about divalent platinum, the persistent lack 

Hundreds of organic compounds having carbon atoms at their centers of asymmetry have been separated into d and l forms. However, a much 

There are cases when one of the four different groups associated with a tetracovalent center of asymmetry is merely an unshared electron pair. 

In generating the electronic structure, we should first construct. sp hybrids on the central atom and divide the states on the outer atoms into eight n,. states (p states oriented perpendicular to the bond axes), four (Tj, states (oriented along the 

The Lewis diagram for a tetrahedral complex such as CCI4 or SOi 

Energy-level diagram for a tetrahedral complex. At the left are the atomic levels the energies of the central atom are labelled with a superscript A. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of orbitals for each level. There are enough electrons in the complex (thirty-two) to fill sixteen orbitals. 

Although the stability against breaking up increases as the central atom is taken from farther to the left in the periodic table, the net charge on the complex also increases hence, such complexes tend to break into individual ions and molecules (for example, CO4 will break into CO2 -I- 20 ). Stability of such complexes comes only with neutralization of the charge, such as by suitably orienting water 

The heat of atomization of the tetrahedral eomplex AB4 as a function of the polar energy ITj. Also shown is the heat of atomization of the sy.stcm made up of two B2 molecules and an isolated A. The tetrahedral complex is stable only if its heat of atomization is higher than that of A + 2B2. 

Bauschlicher, Jr., and P. S. Bagus, J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 8], 5889, argue that there is almost no a bonding from the 4r and 4p orbitals of Ni, and that the dconfiguration is the best starting place for the calculations, as shown here. G. Cooper, K. H. Sze, and C, E. Brion, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 5051, include the metal 4r as a significant part of cr bonding, but with essentially the same net result in molecular orbitals. 

An interesting feature of the calculations of Ziegler et al. is the following. In the early LCAO—MO work it was recognized that in the transitions tj - 2 e and 312 2 e an electron is transferred from MO s with no (or practically no) contribu- 

Finally we emphasize the fact that the calculations involving triplet levels show that the triplets due to the ti 2 e orbital promotion are always below the first singlet transition. We shall see later that these triplets are the levels from which luminescence in closed-shell transition-metal complexes originates. 

The dependence of the rate constants for the forward and reverse reactions of the equilibrium 

Alcohol (ROH) exchange with esters VO(OR)3 has been monitored by n.m.r. line-broadening techniques, for R = Pr , Pr, Bu , and n-pentyl. Activation enthalpies vary between 21.4 and 32.7 kJ mol, activation entropies between —129 and -150 JK mol. These negative values are strongly suggestive of a predominantly associative reaction mechanism.  

8C3 and 3C2). Using the orbital labels shown in Fig. 6.19, the and T2 ligand group orbitals are given in Table 6.4 and pictured in Fig. 6.20, a figure which also shows the metal orbitals of the same symmetries. 

A schematic molecular orbital pattern for a tetrahedral complex with a significant n bonding contribution is shown in Fig. 6.26. It is emphasized that the relative energies shown for the molecular orbitals in this figure are to be regarded as highly flexible. 

Apart from one example, other geometries will not be discussed in detail because there are none for which we could arrive at firm general conclusions. Instead, in Table 6.6 are listed the symmetries of the cr and n ligand group 

Square face-centred trigonal prism, ML4L L Dav ai  

The next step is to include, qualitatively, 7 bonding in the picture. The five ligand group 7 orbitals are of 2A[ + A 2 + E symmetries. They can easily be obtained by the methods of Appendix 6 (treat non-equivalent ligands separately) and are pictured in Fig. 6.28. From this figure it is evident that 

C1O42- + H2 0 HC1O4- + H2 0 HCr04 + H2 0 + HC1O4- + Cl04 2HCr04  

---

Ab initio, gas phase calculations found two minima and one maximum for the reaction coordinate, leading to an exothermic formation of the tetrahedral complex. Oneminimum is an ion-dipole... 

Cobalt exists in the +2 or +3 valence states for the majority of its compounds and complexes. A multitude of complexes of the cobalt(III) ion [22541-63-5] exist, but few stable simple salts are known (2). Werner s discovery and detailed studies of the cobalt(III) ammine complexes contributed gready to modem coordination chemistry and understanding of ligand exchange (3). Octahedral stereochemistries are the most common for the cobalt(II) ion [22541-53-3] as well as for cobalt(III). Cobalt(II) forms numerous simple compounds and complexes, most of which are octahedral or tetrahedral in nature cobalt(II) forms more tetrahedral complexes than other transition-metal ions. Because of the small stabiUty difference between octahedral and tetrahedral complexes of cobalt(II), both can be found in equiUbrium for a number of complexes. Typically, octahedral cobalt(II) salts and complexes are pink to brownish red most of the tetrahedral Co(II) species are blue (see Coordination compounds). 

A few cases of optical isomerism are known for planar and tetrahedral complexes involving unsymmetrical bidentate ligands, but by far the most numerous examples are afforded by octahedral compounds of chelating ligands, e.g. [Cr(oxalate)3] and [Co(edta)] (Fig. 19.13). 

Most Fe complexes are octahedral but several other stereochemistries are known (Table 25.3). [FeX4] (X = Cl, Br, I, NCS) are tetrahedral. A single absorption around 4000 cm due to the T2 E transition is as expected, but magnetic moments of these and other apparently tetrahedral complexes are reported to lie in the range 5.0-5.4BM, and the higher values are difficult to explain. 

Tetrahedral complexes arc also common, being formed more readily with cobali(II) than with the cation of any other truly transitional element (i.e. excluding Zn ). This is consistent with the CFSEs of the two stereochemistries (Table 26.6). Quantitative comparisons between the values given for CFSE(oct) and CFSE(let) are not possible because of course tbc crystal field splittings, Ao and A, differ. Nor is the CFSE by any means the most important factor in determining the stability of a complex. Nevertheless, where other factors are comparable, it can have a decisive effect and it is apparent that no configuration is more favourable than d to the adoption of a tetrahedral as opposed to... 

Thc Crystal l-ield Siabili2ation Energy (CFSl ) is the additional stability which accrues to an ion in a complex, as compared to the free ion, because its d-orbitals are split In an octahedral complex a l2 electron increases the stability by 2/5Ao and an Cf, electron decreases it by 3/5Ao- In a tetrahedral complex the orbital splitting is reversed and an e electron therefore increases the stability by 3/5At whereas a t2 electron decreases it by 2/5Ai. 

Thus the magnetic moments of tetrahedral complexes lie in the range 4.4-4.8 BM, whereas those of octahedral complexes are around 4,8-5.2 BM at room temperature, falling off appreciably as the temperature is reduced. 

Although less numerous than the square-planar complexes, tetrahedral complexes of nickel(II) al.so occur. The simplest of these are the blue (X = Cl, Br, I) ions,... 

Table A gives data for a number of octahedral and tetrahedral complexes.

Four-coordinate metal complexes may have either of two different geometries (Figure 15.3). The four bonds from the central metal may be directed toward the comers of a regular tetrahedron. This is what we would expect from VSEPR model (recall Chapter 7). Two common tetrahedral complexes are Zn(NH3)42+ and C0CI42. ... 

Two or more species with different physical and chemical properties but the same formula are said to be isomers of one another. Complex ions can show many different kinds of isomerism, only one of which we will consider. Geometric isomers are ones that differ only in the spatial orientation of ligands around the central metal atom. Geometric isomerism is found in square planar and octahedral complexes. It cannot occur in tetrahedral complexes where all four positions are equivalent... 

Fig. 22-3. A tetrahedral complex aluminum with coordination number 4.

In addition to the tetrahedral and octahedral complexes mentioned above, there are two other types commonly found—the square planar and the linear. In the square planar complexes, the central atom has four near neighbors at the corners of a square. The coordination number is 4, the same number as in the tetrahedral complexes. An example of a square planar complex is the complex nickel cyanide anion, Ni(CN)4-2. 

The next most common coordination number is 4. Two shapes are typically found for this coordination number. In a tetrahedral complex, the four ligands are found at the vertices of a tetrahedron, as in the tetrachlorocobaltate(ll) ion, [CoCl4]2 (2). An alternative arrangement, most notably for atoms and ions with ds electron configurations such as Pt2+ and Au +, is for the ligands to lie at the corners of a square, giving a square planar complex (3). 

The subscript g is not used to label the orbitals in a tetrahedral complex because there is no center of symmetry. 

In octahedral complexes, the e -orbitals (dz< and dx2 -yi) lie higher in energy than the t2 -orbitals (dxy, dyz, and dzx). The opposite is true in a tetrahedral complex, for which the ligand field splitting is smaller. 

FIGURE 16.28 Tbe energy levels of the d-orbitals in a tetrahedral complex with the ligand field splitting A,. Each box (that is, orbital) can hold two electrons. The subscript g is not used to label the orbitals in a tetrahedral complex. 

Trigonal bipyramidal complexes in which a metal ion is surrounded by five ligands are more rare than octahedral or tetrahedral complexes, but many are known. Will trigonal bipyramidal compounds of the formula MXfY2 exhibit isomerism If so what types of isomerism are possible ... 

---