Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Substituent constants, effect

Hammett substituent constant, effect of cyclo-amyloses on, in hydrolysis of phenyl esters, 23 222... [Pg.112]

This work already showed that substituent constants of one reaction can only be transferred to another reaction when similar effects are operating and when they are operating to the same extent. In order to find a broader basis for the transfer-ability of substituent constants, they were split into substituent constants for the resonance effect and those for the inductive effect. [Pg.182]

Decades of work have led to a profusion of LEERs for a variety of reactions, for both equilibrium constants and reaction rates. LEERs were also established for other observations such as spectral data. Furthermore, various different scales of substituent constants have been proposed to model these different chemical systems. Attempts were then made to come up with a few fundamental substituent constants, such as those for the inductive, resonance, steric, or field effects. These fundamental constants have then to be combined linearly to different extents to model the various real-world systems. However, for each chemical system investigated, it had to be established which effects are operative and with which weighting factors the frmdamental constants would have to be combined. Much of this work has been summarized in two books and has also been outlined in a more recent review [9-11]. [Pg.182]

The fundamental assumption of SAR and QSAR (Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships) is that the activity of a compound is related to its structural and/or physicochemical properties. In a classic article Corwin Hansch formulated Eq. (15) as a linear frcc-cncrgy related model for the biological activity (e.g.. toxicity) of a group of congeneric chemicals [37, in which the inverse of C, the concentration effect of the toxicant, is related to a hy-drophobidty term, FI, an electronic term, a (the Hammett substituent constant). Stcric terms can be added to this equation (typically Taft s steric parameter, E,). [Pg.505]

The more extensive problem of correlating substituent effects in electrophilic substitution by a two-parameter equation has been examined by Brown and his co-workers. In order to define a new set of substituent constants. Brown chose as a model reaction the solvolysis of substituted dimethylphenylcarbinyl chlorides in 90% aq. acetone. In the case ofp-substituted compounds, the transition state, represented by the following resonance structures, is stabilized by direct resonance interaction between the substituent and the site of reaction. [Pg.138]

The applicability of the two-parameter equation and the constants devised by Brown to electrophilic aromatic substitutions was tested by plotting values of the partial rate factors for a reaction against the appropriate substituent constants. It was maintained that such comparisons yielded satisfactory linear correlations for the results of many electrophilic substitutions, the slopes of the correlations giving the values of the reaction constants. If the existence of linear free energy relationships in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were not in dispute, the above procedure would suffice, and the precision of the correlation would measure the usefulness of the p+cr+ equation. However, a point at issue was whether the effect of a substituent could be represented by a constant, or whether its nature depended on the specific reaction. To investigate the effect of a particular substituent in different reactions, the values for the various reactions of the logarithms of the partial rate factors for the substituent were plotted against the p+ values of the reactions. This procedure should show more readily whether the effect of a substituent depends on the reaction, in which case deviations from a hnear relationship would occur. It was concluded that any variation in substituent effects was random, and not a function of electron demand by the electrophile. ... [Pg.139]

Diels-Alder reactions, 4, 842 flash vapour phase pyrolysis, 4, 846 reactions with 6-dimethylaminofuKenov, 4, 844 reactions with JV,n-diphenylnitrone, 4, 841 reactions with mesitonitrile oxide, 4, 841 structure, 4, 715, 725 synthesis, 4, 725, 767-769, 930 theoretical methods, 4, 3 tricarbonyl iron complexes, 4, 847 dipole moments, 4, 716 n-directing effect, 4, 44 2,5-disubstituted synthesis, 4, 116-117 from l,3-dithiolylium-4-olates, 6, 826 electrocyclization, 4, 748-750 electron bombardment, 4, 739 electronic deformation, 4, 722-723 electronic structure, 4, 715 electrophilic substitution, 4, 43, 44, 717-719, 751 directing effects, 4, 752-753 fluorescence spectra, 4, 735-736 fluorinated derivatives, 4, 679 H NMR, 4, 731 Friedel-Crafts acylation, 4, 777 with fused six-membered heterocyclic rings, 4, 973-1036 fused small rings structure, 4, 720-721 gas phase UV spectrum, 4, 734 H NMR, 4, 7, 728-731, 939 solvent effects, 4, 730 substituent constants, 4, 731 halo... [Pg.894]

The Hammett equation in the form of Eq. (4.14) or Eq. (4.15) is free of complications due to steric effects, since it is applied only to meta and para substituents. The geometry of the benzene ring ensures that groups in these positions cannot interact stoically with the site of reaction. Tables of a values for many substituents have been collected some values are given in Table 4.5, but substituent constants are available for a much wider range of... [Pg.207]

One underlying physical basis for the failure of Hammett reaction series is that substituent interactions are some mixture of resonance, field, and inductive effects. When direct resonance interaction is possible, the extent of the resonance increases, and the substituent constants appropriate to the normal mix of resonance and field effects then fail. There have been many attempts to develop sets of a values that take into account extra resonance interactions. [Pg.210]

A more ambitious goal is to separate completely resonance effects from polar effects. This involves using separate substituent constants to account for resonance and polar effects. The modified equation, called a dual-substituent-parameter equation, takes... [Pg.210]

In general, the dissection of substituertt effects need not be limited to resonance and polar components, vdiich are of special prominence in reactions of aromatic compounds.. ny type of substituent interaction with a reaction center could be characterized by a substituent constant characteristic of the particular type of interaction and a reaction parameter indicating the sensitivity of the reaction series to that particular type of interactioa For example, it has been suggested that electronegativity and polarizability can be treated as substituent effects separate from polar and resonance effects. This gives rise to the equation... [Pg.211]

Because the substituent groups have a direct resonance interaction with the charge that develops in the a-complex, quantitative substituent effects exhibit a high resonance component. Hammett equations usually correlate best with the substituent constants (see Section 4.3). ... [Pg.557]

The (T and scales of substituent effects result from changes in the standard reaction that defines the cr scale. An alternative approach to dealing with substituents that possess more than one mechanism of electronic interaction with the reaction site is to make use of more than one substituent constant. Yukawa and Tsuno ... [Pg.321]

The Hammett equation and LFER in general added no new concepts to the qualitative picture that had been built up of electronic effects in organic reactions, but they did provide a quantitative measure that had been lacking and that has been found very useful. Here we will describe the further development of ideas concerning the substituent constant. [Pg.324]

The nonspecialist reading Table 7-7 will probably be impressed by the substantial consistency among cti values evaluated by different methods, but the specialist tends to concentrate on the differences. There is one very interesting difference in Table 7-7, that for cti of alkyl groups based on Eq. (7-33) compared with cti based on the ionization of 3, the latter values showing practically no effect of inductive electron release and certainly no trend with increased branching. (The uncertainties associated with these substituent constants can be found in the original literature.) Swain... [Pg.327]

Taft began the LFER attack on steric effects as part of his separation of electronic and steric effects in aliphatic compounds, which is discussed in Section 7.3. For our present purposes we abstract from that treatment the portion relevant to aromatic substrates. Hammett p values for alkaline ester hydrolysis are in the range +2.2 to +2.8, whereas for acid ester hydrolysis p is close to zero (see Table 7-2). Taft, therefore, concluded that electronic effects of substituents are much greater in the alkaline than in the acid series and. in fact, that they are negligible in the acid series. This left the steric effect alone controlling relative reactivity in the acid series. A steric substituent constant was defined [by analogy with the definition of cr in Eq. (7-22)] by Eq. (7-43), where k is the rate constant for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of an orr/to-substituted benzoate ester and k is the corresponding rate constant for the on/to-methyl ester note that CH3, not H, is the reference substituent. ... [Pg.335]

The ortho effect may consist of several components. The normal electronic effect may receive contributions from inductive and resonance factors, just as with tneta and para substituents. There may also be a proximity or field electronic effect that operates directly between the substituent and the reaction site. In addition there may exist a true steric effect, as a result of the space-filling nature of the substituent (itself ultimately an electronic effect). Finally it is possible that non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding or charge transfer, may take place. The role of the solvent in both the initial state and the transition state may be different in the presence of ortho substitution. Many attempts have been made to separate these several effects. For example. Farthing and Nam defined an ortho substituent constant in the usual way by = log (K/K ) for the ionization of benzoic acids, postulating that includes both electronic and steric components. They assumed that the electronic portion of the ortho effect is identical to the para effect, writing CTe = o-p, and that the steric component is equal to the difference between the total effect and the electronic effect, or cts = cr — cte- They then used a multiple LFER to correlate data for orrAo-substituted reactants. [Pg.336]

Many other definitions of an ortho substituent constant have been made Shorter has reviewed these. Charton analyzed Oo in terms of Oi and CTr, i.e., = a(Ti -I- fpoR, finding that the distribution of inductive and resonance effects (the ratio a/b) varies widely with the substituent and, therefore, that no general Oo scale is possible. Charton also subjected to analysis according to Eq. (7-47),... [Pg.336]

Fujita and Nishioka have attempted to place ortho effects on the same numerical scale as meta and para effects. They assume that the normal ortho electronic effect can be represented by the standard substituent constant appropriate to the reaction (cr, cr", cr, cr°), that the steric effect is given by E , and that the proximity effect is measured by the Swain-Lupton Then a multiple LFER is written... [Pg.336]

Research on the nature of substituent constants continues, with results that can bewilder the nonspecialist. The dominant approach is a statistical one, and the main goal is to dissect substituent effects into separate electronic causes. This has led to a proliferation of terms, symbols, and conclusions. A central issue is (here we change terminology somewhat from our earlier usage) to determine the balance of field and inductive effects contributing to the observed polar electronic effect. In... [Pg.337]

Some authors use O] instead of cr as the substituent constant in such correlations.) An example is provided by the aminolysis of phenyl esters in dioxane the substrates RCOOPh were reacted with -butylamine, and the observed first-order rate constants were related to amine concentration by = k2 [amine] kj [amine]. The rate constants kz and k could be correlated by means of Eq. (7-54), the reaction constants being p = +2.14, b = + 1.03 (for A 2) and p = -1-3.03,8 = -1-1.08 (for ks). Thus, the two reactions are about equally sensitive to steric effects, whereas the amine-catalyzed reaction is more susceptible to electronic effects than is the uncatalyzed reaction. [Pg.343]

In Section 8.4 we will encounter many empirical measures of solvent polarity. These are empirical in the sense that they are model dependent that is, they are defined in terms of a particular standard reaction or process. Thus, these empirical measures play a role in the study of solvent effects exactly analogous to that of the substituent constants in Chapter 7.)... [Pg.401]

Probably the most important development of the past decade was the introduction by Brown and co-workers of a set of substituent constants,ct+, derived from the solvolysis of cumyl chlorides and presumably applicable to reaction series in which a delocalization of a positive charge from the reaction site into the aromatic nucleus is important in the transition state or, in other words, where the importance of resonance structures placing a positive charge on the substituent - -M effect) changes substantially between the initial and transition (or final) states. These ct+-values have found wide application, not only in the particular side-chain reactions for which they were designed, but equally in electrophilic nuclear substitution reactions. Although such a scale was first proposed by Pearson et al. under the label of and by Deno et Brown s systematic work made the scale definitive. [Pg.211]

Within the context of this book the quantitative relationships between structure and chemical reactivity are very informative. One of the early postulates of Ingold and his school in the 1930s (review see Ingold, 1969, p. 78) was that the electronic effects of substituents are composed of two main parts a field/inductive component and a mesomeric component. Hammett s work indicated clearly from the beginning that his substituent constants am and crp reflect Ingold s postulate in numerical terms. In particular, many observations indicated that the /7-substituent constant ap is the sum of a field/inductive component 0 and a resonance (mesomeric) component (Jr. [Pg.149]

Substituent effects as evaluated on the basis of the Hammett equation and its extended forms, are - this has to be emphasized again — empirical results. Nevertheless, it is very soothing to know that theoretical approaches, i. e., calculations of substituent effects using ab initio molecular orbital theory (Topsom, 1976, 1981, 1983 Taft and Topsom, 1987, STO-3G and 4-31G level), give results that are consistent with the experimental data. However, it is not recommended to use only theoretically calculated substituent constants and values for F, R, and other parameters for the interpretation of experimental data. [Pg.150]

Before we close this section we make reference to an extended form of the Hammett equation in which the substituent constant and the reaction constant are separated into contributions from the field effect (F) and the mesomeric effect (R). This procedure was suggested by Taft in 1957 for 4-substituted benzene derivatives. It is called a dual substituent parameter (DSP) equation (Scheme 7-2). [Pg.150]

The diazonio group is a somewhat more complex substituent for such evaluations because it is charged, in contrast to the majority of substituents on which the Hammett treatment is based. The electrostatic interaction of the diazonio and other charged groups was calculated by Hoefnagel et al. (1978) and by Exner (1978). The substituent constants they obtained, including the effects of coulomb interactions, are only slightly different from those of Lewis and Johnson (1959). [Pg.152]


See other pages where Substituent constants, effect is mentioned: [Pg.191]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.778]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.150]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.24 ]




SEARCH



Dissociation constant substituent effect

Electrical effects substituent constants

Field effect substituent constant

Hammett substituent constant, effect

Hammett substituent constant, effect phenyl esters

Substituent constant

Substituents constants

© 2024 chempedia.info