Field effect substituent constant

The calculated pA B values depend on the substituents as expected from the electronic theories. The 3-iodo substituent behaves similarly to other 3-halo substituents 3-F (1.51), 3-Br (1.40) and 3-Cl (1.38). The CF3 substituent decreases the basicity through the same electron-withdrawing inductive effect as the COOMe, COMe, CN and NO2 substituents. The pATbij values follow the order of the <7 f field-inductive substituent constant as shown by Equations 7.49 and 7.50 and as illustrated in Figure 7.15. 

Decades of work have led to a profusion of LEERs for a variety of reactions, for both equilibrium constants and reaction rates. LEERs were also established for other observations such as spectral data. Furthermore, various different scales of substituent constants have been proposed to model these different chemical systems. Attempts were then made to come up with a few fundamental substituent constants, such as those for the inductive, resonance, steric, or field effects. These fundamental constants have then to be combined linearly to different extents to model the various real-world systems. However, for each chemical system investigated, it had to be established which effects are operative and with which weighting factors the frmdamental constants would have to be combined. Much of this work has been summarized in two books and has also been outlined in a more recent review [9-11]. 

One underlying physical basis for the failure of Hammett reaction series is that substituent interactions are some mixture of resonance, field, and inductive effects. When direct resonance interaction is possible, the extent of the resonance increases, and the substituent constants appropriate to the normal mix of resonance and field effects then fail. There have been many attempts to develop sets of a values that take into account extra resonance interactions. 

The ortho effect may consist of several components. The normal electronic effect may receive contributions from inductive and resonance factors, just as with tneta and para substituents. There may also be a proximity or field electronic effect that operates directly between the substituent and the reaction site. In addition there may exist a true steric effect, as a result of the space-filling nature of the substituent (itself ultimately an electronic effect). Finally it is possible that non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding or charge transfer, may take place. The role of the solvent in both the initial state and the transition state may be different in the presence of ortho substitution. Many attempts have been made to separate these several effects. For example. Farthing and Nam defined an ortho substituent constant in the usual way by = log (K/K ) for the ionization of benzoic acids, postulating that includes both electronic and steric components. They assumed that the electronic portion of the ortho effect is identical to the para effect, writing CTe = o-p, and that the steric component is equal to the difference between the total effect and the electronic effect, or cts = cr — cte- They then used a multiple LFER to correlate data for orrAo-substituted reactants. 

Research on the nature of substituent constants continues, with results that can bewilder the nonspecialist. The dominant approach is a statistical one, and the main goal is to dissect substituent effects into separate electronic causes. This has led to a proliferation of terms, symbols, and conclusions. A central issue is (here we change terminology somewhat from our earlier usage) to determine the balance of field and inductive effects contributing to the observed polar electronic effect. In... 

Within the context of this book the quantitative relationships between structure and chemical reactivity are very informative. One of the early postulates of Ingold and his school in the 1930s (review see Ingold, 1969, p. 78) was that the electronic effects of substituents are composed of two main parts a field/inductive component and a mesomeric component. Hammett s work indicated clearly from the beginning that his substituent constants am and crp reflect Ingold s postulate in numerical terms. In particular, many observations indicated that the /7-substituent constant ap is the sum of a field/inductive component 0 and a resonance (mesomeric) component (Jr. 

As suggested by Roberts and Moreland many years ago (1953), the acidity constants of 4-substituted bicyclooctane-l-carboxylic acids provide a very suitable system for defining a field/induction parameter. In this rigid system the substituent X is held firmly in place and there is little possibility for mesomeric delocalization or polarization interactions between X and COOH (or COO-). Therefore, it can be assumed that X influences the deprotonation of COOH only through space (the field effect) and through intervening o-bonds. On this basis Taft (1956, p. 595) and Swain and Lupton (1968) were able to calculate values for o and crR. 

Before we close this section we make reference to an extended form of the Hammett equation in which the substituent constant and the reaction constant are separated into contributions from the field effect (F) and the mesomeric effect (R). This procedure was suggested by Taft in 1957 for 4-substituted benzene derivatives. It is called a dual substituent parameter (DSP) equation (Scheme 7-2). 

For sets nos. 1, 2, and 3 of Table XXVII, eq. (1) appears to hold for ionization of ortho substituted benzoic acids (f =. 048 —. 058), with Kj = Pi I= 1.6 . 1. This result is reasonable for field effects transmitted only throu the molecular cavity i.e., the lines of force do not pass through appreciable solvent of high dielectric constant (the solvent is presumably excluded by the close proximity of the CO2H center and the substituent) (36). It is further of interest that eq. (1) fails for the ionization of ortho substituted benzoic acids in solvents of high OH content (sets nos. 4, 5, and 6 of Table XXVII). 

Taft (21) has suggested that the electrical effect of a substituent is composed of localized (inductive and/or field) and delocalized (resonance) factors. Thus we may write the substituent constant of the group X as... 

French workers have studied the 1H- and 13C-NMR parameters of disubstituted selenophenes.37 38 The proton chemical shifts are discussed in terms of magnetic anisotropy and electric field effects of the substituents in order to study the conformational equilibrium of the carbonyl group. The relationship between the H- and 13C-chemical shifts and 7t-electron distribution calculated by the PPP method are examined. Shifts and coupling constants are discussed in additivity terms. 

A classical Hansch approach and an artificial neural networks approach were applied to a training set of 32 substituted phenylpiperazines characterized by their affinity for the 5-HTiA-R and the generic arAR [91]. The study was aimed at evaluating the structural requirements for the 5-HTiA/ai selectivity. Each chemical structure was described by six physicochemical parameters and three indicator variables. As electronic descriptors, the field and resonance constants of Swain and Lupton were used. Furthermore, the vdW volumes were employed as steric parameters. The hydrophobic effects exerted by the ortho- and meta-substituents were measured by using the Hansch 7t-ortho and n-meta constants [91]. The resulting models provided a significant correlation of electronic, steric and hydro-phobic parameters with the biological affinities. Moreover, it was inferred that the... 

In this equation (A /A 0)B is the rate constant for basic hydrolysis of XCH-.COOR divided by the rate constant for basic hydrolysis of CH3COOR, (k/k(l)A is the similar rate-constant ratio for acid catalysis, and 0.181 is an arbitrary constant. substituent constant for a group X, substituted at a saturated carbon, that reflects only field effects.42 Once a set of <31 values was obtained, it was found that the equation... 

The use of different kinds of substituent constants complicates the application of the Hammett equation and over 20 different sets of o values have been proposed. A simplification is the representation of substituent constants as linear combinations of two terms, one representing "field" or "inductive" effects and the other resonance effects.6/f... 

A clearer indication of the absolute and relative contributions of field, resonance, and polarizability effects to the acidity of the various compounds can be obtained by calculating the individual PpOF, pRoR, and pj a terms for each acid rather than just focusing on the p , pj, and p° values, respectively. These terms are summarized in Table 18 for the compounds with Y-groups with unknown substituent constants (Y = C=CH, CH=NH, and CH=S), these terms were calculated based on approximate substituent constants estimated as described in reference 118. 

Further insights were obtained by analyzing the relative contributions of field, resonance, and polarizability effects to the barriers in a similar way as for the acidities, i.e., by correlating AAH = AH (CH3Y) - A//OCII4) with the respective Taft substituent constants according to Equation (29). The correlation is shown in Fig. 5 it yielded p =-22.6, = 9.81 and pj = 7.59 with... 

Hammett s success in treating the electronic effect of substituents on the equilibria rates of organic reactions led Taft to apply the same principles to steric, inductive, and resonance effects. The Hammett o constants appear to be made up primarily of two electronic vectors field-inductive effect and resonance effect. For substituents on saturated systems, such as aliphatic compounds, the resonance effect is rarely a factor, so the o form the benzoic acid systems is not applicable. Taft extended Hammett s idea to aliphatics by introducing a steric parameter ( .). He assumed that for the hydrolysis of esters, steric and resonance effects will be the same whether the hydrolysis is catalyzed by acid or base. Rate differences would be caused only by the field-inductive effects of R and R in esters of the general formula (XCOOR), where X is the substituent being evaluated and R is held constant. Field effects of substituents X could be determined by measuring the rates of acid and base catalysis of a series XCOOR. From these rate constants, a value a could be determined by Equation (5.9) ... 

Another extension is in the field of alicyclic compounds (7, 112). In steroid compounds it has been proved that long-distance effects, e.g. from position 17 to 3 and vice versa, affect polarographic half-wave potentials. Finally it has been demonstrated (7, 113) that Hammett and Taft substituent constants can be used as a first approximation to express the substituent effects in numerous types of mono- and polycyclic heterocyclic compounds. 

---