Stereoisomers description

We 11 begin with cis and trans 1 4 dimethylcyclohexane A conventional method uses wedge and dash descriptions to represent cis and trans stereoisomers m cyclic systems... 

Note carefully the difference between enantiomers and diastereomers. Enantiomers have opposite configurations at all chirality centers, whereas diastereomers have opposite configurations at some (one or more) chirality centers but the same configuration at others. A full description of the four stereoisomers of threonine is given in Table 9.2. Of the four, only the 2S,3R isomer, [o]D= -28.3, occurs naturally in plants and animals and is an essential human nutrient. This result is typical most biological molecules are chiral, and usually only one stereoisomer is found in nature. 

Two appendices are included at the end of this chapter. The first is intended to serve as a reminder, for those of you who might need it, of the nomendature and representation of stereoisomers. The second appendix contains descriptions of various chemo-enzymatic methods of amino acid production. This appendix has been constructed largely from the recent primary literature and includes many new advances in the field. It is not necessary for you to consult the appendix to satisfy the learning objectives of the chapter, rather the information is provided to illustrate the extensive range of methodology assodated with chemo-enzymatic approaches to amino add production. It is therefore available for those of you who may wish to extend your knowledge in this area. Where available, data derived from die literature are used to illustrate methods and to discuss economic aspects of large-scale production. 

The dissection of a molecular model into those components that are deemed to be essential for the understanding of the stereochemistry of the whole may be termed factorization (9). The first and most important step toward this goal was taken by van t Hoff and Le Bel when they introduced the concept of the asymmetric carbon atom (10a, 1 la) and discussed the achiral stereoisomerism of the olefins (10b,lib). We need such factorization not only for the enumeration and description of possible stereoisomers, important as these objectives are, but also, as we have seen, for the understanding of stereoselective reactions. More subtle differences also giving rise to differences in reactivity with chiral reagents, but referable to products of a different factorization, will be taken up in Sect. IX. 

In Ref. 42 a similar approach was chosen as in Ref. 39 using stereoisomers of the type Fmoc-L-Asp-L-Asp-D-Xaa-D-Xaa (Xaa = Gly, Ala, Phe, His, Ser, Tyr). Interestingly, in part the findings are different. The ACE/MS hyphenation caused a number of practical problems affecting the reliability of the system. Surprisingly, the authors faced problems with positive ESI and were forced to use negative ionization. Because of the use of the nonvolatile Tris buffer, crystallization problems occurred frequently. Only high-EOF conditions prevented this knockout scenario. However, the description of problems and related solutions is very instructive. 

The description of stereoisomers is related to analysis in terms of the four-point figures discussed in the previous section. However, these units are seldom encountered unobscured. More common are certain partially overlapping combinations (see Table 1), stereogenic units, analysis of which is an important problem. A stereogenic unit consists of a core of bonds and ligands. 

Mislow and Siegel6 presented a penetrating analysis of these problems. However, they underestimated the capacity of logical description systems based on permutation characteristics, such as the C1P system, to make symmetry relationships among stereoisomers apparent (see Section 1.1.5.3.4.). 

The description of stereoselective reactions in which one new stereogenic unit is created, i.e., where a pair of enantio- or diastereomers can result, is straightforward. However, there are now numerous examples known of stereoselective reactions in which two or more stereogenic units are generated in the bond-forming step. Accordingly, more than two stereoisomers are formed. In principle, stating the ratio of the stereoisomeric products would suffice for the description of the outcome of such a reaction. However, mechanistic rationalization and prediction of the results are vastly simplified when subsets of the stereoisomers and their relative ratios are considered. Here the terms simple and induced diastereoselectivity play an important practical role. 

The Suter-Flory RIS model of PP (A 027 is employed to calculate the 13C NMR chemical shifts expected at the 9-Ca and the CH3 carbons and at the 8- and 10-CHj carbons in the various stereoisomers of the PP model compound 3,5,7,9,11,13,15-heptamethylheptadecane. Differences in the chemical shifts of the same carbon atom in the various stereoisomers are assumed to be attributable solely to stereo-sequence dependent differences in the probability that the given carbon atom is involved in three-bond gauche or y interactions with other carbon atoms. The Suter-Flory model provides an accurate description of the conformational characteristics of PP which permits a detailed understanding of its 3C NMR spectrum. On the other hand, the failure of Provasoti and Ferro s calculations [Macromolecules 1977, 10, 874] is directely attributed to the inadequacies of the Boyd and Breitling three-state RIS model of PP (A 022). 

Given the molecular formula, we now have to describe how the different atoms are connected to each other. The description of the exact connection of the various atoms is commonly referred to as the structure of the compound. Depending on the number and types of atoms, there may be many different ways to interconnect a given set of atoms which yield different structures. Such related compounds are referred to as isomers. Furthermore, as we will discuss later, there may be several compounds whose atoms are connected in exactly the same order (i.e., they exhibit the same structure), but their spatial arrangement differs. Such compounds are then called stereoisomers. It should be pointed out, however, that, quite often, and particularly in German-speaking areas, the term structure is also used to denote both the connectivity (i.e., the way the atoms are connected to each other) as well as the spatial arrangement of the atoms. The term constitution of a compound is then sometimes introduced to describe solely the connectivity. 

A clear description of the RS system for naming stereoisomers, with practical suggestions for determining and remembering the handedness of isomers. 

As noted previously, the classification of stereoisomers preferred by contemporary organic chemists is the enantiomer-diastereomer dichotomy17 and this may be quite conveniently applied to coordination compounds. Thus, complexes (9a) and (9b) are enantiomers, but (9a) and (9c), and (9b) and (9c), are diastereomers. Older terminology might have led to the description of A and B as optical antipodes and to (A+B) and C as geometrical isomers. 

The description of ci-amino acids as D or L is a holdover from an older nomenclature system. In this system (5)-alanine is called L-alanine. The enantiomer would be D- or ( )-serine. The l (laevo, turned to the left D = dextro, turned to the right) designation refers to the ct-carbon in the essential amino acids. In alanine, there is a single a-carbon that is asymmetric. When two asymmetric centers are present as in L-threonine, the stereochemistry of both carbons must be considered. The common form of L-threonine is the 25,3R stereoisomer. 

The introduction of branches also makes it possible to have stereoisomers. Compounds with a single methyl branch at any position other than carbon 2 or the exact center of the chain can exist as one of two possible enantiomers, whereas compounds with two or more branches have a number of different stereoisomers (e.g., enantiomers, me so isomers, or diastereomers). Generic reactions that produce racemic mixtures or mixtures of stereoisomers will be discussed first, followed by descriptions of methods used to make individual stereoisomers. 

The (R,S) stereoisomer of a model complex of 8 possesses C symmetry and allows us to classify the molecular orbitals in terms of the irreducible representations ag and a. It turned out that HOMO and LUMO belong to different irreducible representations. Exchange of occupation of these orbitals thus leads to different electronic configurations. While only one of the two electronic configurations corresponds to the ground state and then has a valid description in the framework of DFT, both electronic configurations can be subjected to a geometry optimization in C, symmetry and yield two different structures the results of the optimizations are depicted in Fig. 15. We took the... 

Each stereoisomer in a pair of enantiomers has the property of being able to rotate monochromatic plane-polarized light. The instrument chemists use to demonstrate this property is called a polarimeter (see your text for a further description of the instrument). A pure solution of a single one of the enantiomers (referred to as an optical isomer) can rotate the light in either a clockwise (dextrorotatory, +) or a counterclockwise (levorotatory, -) direction. Thus those molecules that are optically active possess a handedness or chirality. Achiral molecules are optically inactive and do not rotate the light. 

Regarding production of bulk drug substances, specifications for contaminants should be established for all solvents used in the process. A comparison should be performed between the manufacturer s Certificate of Analysis and the submitted specifications, and any discrepancies should be justified. A full description for the route of synthesis should be given, as this is important for the testing and control of impurities and process solvent residues. The FDA expects that, at the time of submission, it will be determined if the drug substance exists in a multiple solid state form (racemic mixture stereoisomer) and whether this affects the dissolution and bioavailability of the drug product. 

Inherently chiral derivatives can be also obtained from calix[4]arenes if three different units are incorporated in the order ABAC or if only two different phenolic units are present, provided these derivatives are fixed in conformations having no symmetry plane and center. Figure 13 gives a survey of the possibilities. For such a classification, one should keep in mind that hydroxy groups (or methoxy groups but ethoxy groups are on the borderline) can pass the annulus. Their orientation may be necessary in a description of the actual conformation of such compounds. It must not be indicated, however, if different stable stereoisomers are to be... 

Lumping of a discrete system into a lower order one is discussed, for the case of kinetics, in Section IV, A. In that section we also show that it is possible to lump a continuous system into a finite-order one. The important point is that, in dealing with discrete systems with large (or countably infinite) numbers of components, or with continuous systems, it is very usefiil to reduce the dimensionality of the composition description for practical calculations. For example, one could consider a subset of similar compounds, such as stereoisomers, to be a single compound, or lump, with the properties of the racemic mixture. More generally, we can project the composition vector onto a lower dimensional subspace that is not simply a partitioning of the compounds into subsets. One could also reduce dimensionality by some nonlinear parameterization rather than by linear projection, but we do not consider that case here. 

---