Complexes stereochemistry

Corey E J and J C Bailar ]t 1959. The Stereochemistry of Complex Inorganic Compounds. XXII. Stereospecific Effects in Complex Ions. Journal of the American Chemical Society 81 2620-2629. 

A useful catalyst for asymmetric aldol additions is prepared in situ from mono-0> 2,6-diisopropoxybenzoyl)tartaric acid and BH3 -THF complex in propionitrile solution at 0 C. Aldol reactions of ketone enol silyl ethers with aldehydes were promoted by 20 mol % of this catalyst solution. The relative stereochemistry of the major adducts was assigned as Fischer- /ir o, and predominant /i -face attack of enol ethers at the aldehyde carbonyl carbon atom was found with the (/ ,/ ) nantiomer of the tartaric acid catalyst (K. Furuta, 1991). 

Formation of a Tr-allylpalladium complex 29 takes place by the oxidative addition of allylic compounds, typically allylic esters, to Pd(0). The rr-allylpal-ladium complex is a resonance form of ir-allylpalladium and a coordinated tt-bond. TT-Allylpalladium complex formation involves inversion of stereochemistry, and the attack of the soft carbon nucleophile on the 7r-allylpalladium complex is also inversion, resulting in overall retention of the stereochemistry. On the other hand, the attack of hard carbon nucleophiles is retention, and hence Overall inversion takes place by the reaction of the hard carbon nucleophiles. 

The stereochemistry of the Pd-catalyzed allylation of nucleophiles has been studied extensively[5,l8-20]. In the first step, 7r-allylpalladium complex formation by the attack of Pd(0) on an allylic part proceeds by inversion (anti attack). Then subsequent reaction of soft carbon nucleophiles, N- and 0-nucleophiles proceeds by inversion to give 1. Thus overall retention is observed. On the other hand, the reaction of hard carbon nucleophiles of organometallic compounds proceeds via transmetallation, which affords 2 by retention, and reductive elimination affords the final product 3. Thus the overall inversion is observed in this case[21,22]. 

Based on the above-mentioned stereochemistry of the allylation reactions, nucleophiles have been classified into Nu (overall retention group) and Nu (overall inversion group) by the following experiments with the cyclic exo- and ent/n-acetales 12 and 13[25], No Pd-catalyzed reaction takes place with the exo-allylic acetate 12, because attack of Pd(0) from the rear side to form Tr-allyl-palladium is sterically difficult. On the other hand, smooth 7r-allylpalladium complex formation should take place with the endo-sWyWc acetate 13. The Nu -type nucleophiles must attack the 7r-allylic ligand from the endo side 14, namely tram to the exo-oriented Pd, but this is difficult. On the other hand, the attack of the Nu -type nucleophiles is directed to the Pd. and subsequent reductive elimination affords the exo products 15. Thus the allylation reaction of 13 takes place with the Nu nucleophiles (PhZnCl, formate, indenide anion) and no reaction with Nu nucleophiles (malonate. secondary amines, LiP(S)Ph2, cyclopentadienide anion). 

The regioselective and stereospecific construction of C-20 stereochemistry is explained by the following mechanism. The Pd(0) species attacks the ( )-/3-carbonate 616 from the a-side by inversion to form the Tr-allylpalladium species 620, which has a stable syn structure[392]. Then concerted decarboxylation-hydride transfer as in 621 takes place from the a-side to give the unnatural configuration in 617. On the other hand, the Tr-allylpalladium complex 622... 

This chapter is divided into two parts The first and major portion is devoted to carbohydrate structure You will see how the principles of stereochemistry and confer matronal analysis combine to aid our understanding of this complex subject The remain der of the chapter describes chemical reactions of carbohydrates Most of these reactions are simply extensions of what you have already learned concerning alcohols aldehydes ketones and acetals... 

Cholesterol was isolated m the eighteenth century but its structure is so complex that Its correct constitution was not determined until 1932 and its stereochemistry not verified until 1955 Steroids are characterized by the tetracyclic ring system shown m Figure 26 9a As shown m Figure 26 9b cholesterol contains this tetracyclic skeleton modified to include an alcohol function at C 3 a double bond at C 5 methyl groups at C 10 and C 13 and a C Hn side chain at C 17 Isoprene units may be discerned m var lous portions of the cholesterol molecule but the overall correspondence with the iso prene rule is far from perfect Indeed cholesterol has only 27 carbon atoms three too few for It to be classed as a tnterpene... 

Gold Compounds. The chemistry of nonmetallic gold is predominandy that of Au(I) and Au(III) compounds and complexes. In the former, coordination number two and linear stereochemistry are most common. The majority of known Au(III) compounds are four coordinate and have square planar configurations. In both of these common oxidation states, gold preferably bonds to large polarizable ligands and, therefore, is termed a class b metal or soft acid. 

X-Ray Diffraction. Because of the rapid advancement of computer technology (qv), this technique has become almost routine and the stmctures of moderately complex molecules can be estabUshed sometimes in as Htde as 24 hours. An example illustrating the method is offered by Reference 24. The reaction of the acrylate (20) with phenyldiazo derivatives results in the formation of pyrazoline (21). The stereochemistry of the substituents and the conformation of the ring can only be estabUshed by single crystal x-ray diffraction. 

Alkenyl zirconium complexes derived from alkynes form C—C bonds when added to aHyUc palladium complexes. The stereochemistry differs from that found in reactions of corresponding carbanions with aHyl—Pd in a way that suggests the Cp2ZrRCl alkylates first at Pd, rather than by direct attack on the aUyl group (259). 

Extensive efforts have been made to develop catalyst systems to control the stereochemistry, addition site, and other properties of the final polymers. Among the most prominant ones are transition metal-based catalysts including Ziegler or Ziegler-Natta type catalysts. The metals most frequentiy studied are Ti (203,204), Mo (205), Co (206-208), Cr (206-208), Ni (209,210), V (205), Nd (211-215), and other lanthanides (216). Of these, Ti, Co, and Ni complexes have been used commercially. It has long been recognized that by varying the catalyst compositions, the trans/cis ratio for 1,4-additions can be controlled quite selectively (204). Catalysts have also been developed to control the ratio of 1,4- to 1,2-additions within the polymers (203). 

The strategy of the catalyst development was to use a rhodium complex similar to those of the Wilkinson hydrogenation but containing bulky chiral ligands in an attempt to direct the stereochemistry of the catalytic reaction to favor the desired L isomer of the product (17). Active and stereoselective catalysts have been found and used in commercial practice, although there is now a more economical route to L-dopa than through hydrogenation of the prochiral precursor. 

Two pathways were found for the chiral hydrogenation, and they give products with different stereochemistries (19). One pathway involves the preferred mode of initial binding of the reactant to the catalyst. The other pathway involves an isomer of the reactant—catalyst complex that is formed in only small amounts, but its conversion is energetically favorable and constitutes the kinetically predominant pathway to products (9) (Fig. 4). Thus the chirahty of the product is determined not by the preferred mode of the initial binding, but instead by the more favorable energetics of the pathway involving the minor isomer of the reactant—catalyst complex. 

Cobalt exists in the +2 or +3 valence states for the majority of its compounds and complexes. A multitude of complexes of the cobalt(III) ion [22541-63-5] exist, but few stable simple salts are known (2). Werner s discovery and detailed studies of the cobalt(III) ammine complexes contributed gready to modem coordination chemistry and understanding of ligand exchange (3). Octahedral stereochemistries are the most common for the cobalt(II) ion [22541-53-3] as well as for cobalt(III). Cobalt(II) forms numerous simple compounds and complexes, most of which are octahedral or tetrahedral in nature cobalt(II) forms more tetrahedral complexes than other transition-metal ions. Because of the small stabiUty difference between octahedral and tetrahedral complexes of cobalt(II), both can be found in equiUbrium for a number of complexes. Typically, octahedral cobalt(II) salts and complexes are pink to brownish red most of the tetrahedral Co(II) species are blue (see Coordination compounds). 

Many classes of natural product possess heterocyclic components (e.g. alkaloids, carbohydrates). However, their structures are often complex, and although structure-based names derived by using the principles outlined in the foregoing sections can be devised, such names tend to be impossibly cumbersome. Furthermore, the properties of complex natural product structures are often closely bound up with their stereochemistry, and for a molecule containing a number of asymmetric elements the specification of a particular stereoisomer by using the fundamental descriptors (R/S, EjZ) is a job few chemists relish. 

The need for simple names to describe complex structures has been met in several ways, the most straightforward of which is to use a trivial name giving little or no structural information e.g. morphine, opuntiol). Such names are.often based on the Latin name of the species from which the compound was isolated e.g. opuntiol from Opuntia eliator). While this is acceptable for a newly isolated compound of unknown structure, it is less satisfactory once the structure is established. What is needed is some means of establishing the relationship of the compound to others in the same class, without going into too much detail with regard to structure and stereochemistry. This can be achieved by defining, for a particular group of structures, a parent structure. 

Although ethereal solutions of methyl lithium may be prepared by the reaction of lithium wire with either methyl iodide or methyl bromide in ether solution, the molar equivalent of lithium iodide or lithium bromide formed in these reactions remains in solution and forms, in part, a complex with the methyllithium. Certain of the ethereal solutions of methyl 1ithium currently marketed by several suppliers including Alfa Products, Morton/Thiokol, Inc., Aldrich Chemical Company, and Lithium Corporation of America, Inc., have been prepared from methyl bromide and contain a full molar equivalent of lithium bromide. In several applications such as the use of methyllithium to prepare lithium dimethyl cuprate or the use of methyllithium in 1,2-dimethyoxyethane to prepare lithium enolates from enol acetates or triraethyl silyl enol ethers, the presence of this lithium salt interferes with the titration and use of methyllithium. There is also evidence which indicates that the stereochemistry observed during addition of methyllithium to carbonyl compounds may be influenced significantly by the presence of a lithium salt in the reaction solution. For these reasons it is often desirable to have ethereal solutions... 

Up to this point, we have emphasized the stereochemical properties of molecules as objects, without concern for processes which affect the molecular shape. The term dynamic stereochemistry applies to die topology of processes which effect a structural change. The cases that are most important in organic chemistry are chemical reactions, conformational changes, and noncovalent complex formation. In order to understand the stereochemical aspects of a dynamic process, it is essential not only that the stereochemical relationship between starting and product states be established, but also that the spatial features of proposed intermediates and transition states must account for the observed stereochemical transformations. 

According to this mechanism, a molecule of bromine becomes complexed to the double bond of the alkene, and reorganization of the bonding electrons gives the product. This mechanism can be shown to be incorrect for most alkenes on the basis of stereochemistry. Most alkenes give bromination products in which the two added bromines are on opposite sides of the former carbon-carbon double bond. The above mechanism does not account for this and therefore must be incorrect... 

---