Source-screen distance

The radiation therapy in practice requires from the neutron source a high dose rate, good depth dose, well-defined horizontal and vertical beams movable around the patient, and a variable beam size up to about 20 x 20 cm. In addition, an average neutron yield of 4 x 10 /s, as well as 125 cm specified source-screen distance (SSD), and 2 cm maximum source diameter are needed for cancer therapy. A typical treatment schedule for malignant diseases involves two fractions per week, modal tumor doses of 1.2-1.3 Gy per firaction, and total doses in the range of 14-21 Gy. 

In this Safety Guide it is pointed out that in some Member States a screening distance value of 8-10 km is used for source of hazardous clouds and 5-10 km for sources of explosions. 

The sensitivity curves are plots of maximum achieved sensitivity as a function of thickness of the object for a given focal spot size and source to detector distance. The best attainable sensitivity in image intensifier systems is a function of tube voltage, current, scattered radiation and the screen gamma. As a first step, stainless steel plates with thicknesses ranging from 5 mm-30 mm in steps of 5 mm were chosen. These plates had a length of 950 mm and width of 280 mm. The plate is positioned very close and at the center to the LI. tube. The extraneous... 

In order to obtain results from SCREEN corresponding to the procedures for the simple elevated or flat terrain option, the user should select the full meteorology option, the automated distance array option, and, if applicable for the source, the simple elevated terrain option. The simple elevated terrain option would be used if the terrain rises above the stack base elevation but is less than the height of the physical stack. These, as well as the other options listed in the sidebar, are explained in more detail below. 

Thus, the user can input the minimum site boundary distance as the minimum distance for calculation and obtain a concentration estimate at the site boundary and beyond, while ignoring distances less than the site boundary. If the automated distance array is used, then the SCREEN model will use an iteration routine to determine the maximum value and associated distance to the nearest meter. If the minimum and maximum distances entered do not encompass the true maximum concentration, then the maximum value calculated by SCREEN may not be the true maximum. Therefore, it is recommended that the maximum distance be set sufficiently large initially to ensure that the maximum concentration is found. This distance will depend on the source, and some trial and error may be necessary however, the user can input a distance of 50,000 m to examine the entire array. The iteration routine stops after 50 iterations and prints out a message if the maximum is not found. Also, since there may be several local maxima in the concentration distribution associated with different wind speeds, it is possible that SCREEN will not identify the overall maximum in its iteration. This is not likely to be a frequent occurrence, but will be more likely for stability classes C and D due to the larger number of wind speeds examined. 

The range of directions used in the search is determined from a set of look-up tables based on the aspect ratio of the area source, the stability category, and the downwind distance. The SCREEN model also provides the user an option to specify a wind direction orientation relative to the long axis of the rectangular area. The second option may be used to estimate the concentration at a particular receptor location relative to the area. The output table for area sources includes the wind direction associated with the maximum concentration at each distance. 

EMGRESP is a source-term and dispersion emergency response screening tool for calculating downwind contours with a minimum of user input and computational expense in the event of a release of a hazardous chemical. The program provides hazardous contaminant information, calculates toxic concentrations at various distances downwind of a release, and c" the... 

Young s Interference Experiment (1.5) A Young s interferometer basically consists of a stop with two holes ( array elements ), illuminated by a distant point source, and a screen which picks up the light at a sufficiently large distance behind the holes. The light patch produced by the stop is extended and shows a set of dark fringes which are oriented perpendicularly to the direction which connects the centers of the two openings. 

An impurity atom in a solid induces a variation in the potential acting on the host conduction electrons, which they screen by oscillations in their density. Friedel introduced such oscillations with wave vector 2kp to calculate the conductivity of dilute metallic alloys [10]. In addition to the pronounced effect on the relaxation time of conduction electrons, Friedel oscillations may also be a source of mutual interactions between impurity atoms through the fact that the binding energy of one such atom in the solid depends on the electron density into which it is embedded, and this quantity oscillates around another impurity atom. Lau and Kohn predicted such interactions to depend on distance as cos(2A pr)/r5 [11]. We note that for isotropic Fermi surfaces there is a single kp-value, whereas in the general case one has to insert the Fermi vector pointing into the direction of the interaction [12,13]. The electronic interactions are oscillatory, and their 1 /r5-decay is steeper than the monotonic 1 /r3-decay of elastic interactions [14]. Therefore elastic interactions between bulk impurities dominate the electronic ones from relatively short distances on. 

Figure 7.15 Two slit experiment demonstrating the interference of monochromatic light. Concentric curves (cylinders) represent locations of maximum intensity of light waves propagating from the slit sources. Dimensions have been accentuated for clarity generally the slits are 0.1 mm wide and 1 mm apart, the distance from the source slit to the double slit screen is 0.6 m and from the double slit to the screen, 3 m [16). As the double slits are brought closer together, more interference fringes will appear on the screen.

Now suppose the object in Figure 1.2 consists of a row of small holes spaced a distance d apart in an opaque screen that is illuminated by light from a small (1 mW) helium-neon laser. This light is monochromatic, and the normals to the wavefronts (rays) are essentially parallel. Furthermore, such a light source illuminates the object coherently that is, at any instant... 

---