Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solver validation

Recall the remark on stiffness and I VP solver validation of p. 201 and vary the tolerances inside neurocycle.m to verify that the acetylcholine concentration of the neurocycle enzyme system with hf = 0.0045525 behaves chaotically as depicted in Figure 4.56. [Pg.249]

Case-Study for Solver Validation Nonequilibrium Distillation Column Model... [Pg.220]

In order to make the problem solvable, a linearized process model has been derived. This enables the use of standard Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) techniques, for which robust solvers are commercially available. In order to ensure the validity of the linearization approach, the process model was verified with a significant amount of real data, collected from production databases and production (shift) reports. [Pg.100]

In addition to providing optimal x values, both simplex and barrier solvers provide values of dual variables or Lagrange multipliers for each constraint. We discuss Lagrange multipliers at some length in Chapter 8, and the conclusions reached there, valid for nonlinear problems, must hold for linear programs as well. In Chapter 8 we show that the dual variable for a constraint is equal to the derivative of the optimal objective value with respect to the constraint limit or right-hand side. We illustrate this with examples in Section 7.8. [Pg.242]

Six coupled governing equations listed in Table 1 are valid in all regions of a PEFC, and fluxes at an internal boundary between two adjacent regions are automatically continuous. Such a single-domain model is well suited for CFD implementation. In contrast, multidomain models, such as the one developed by Dutta et al., compute separate solutions for the anode and cathode subdomains, respectively, and then patch the two solutions through the water transport flux across the MEA interface. Numerically, this model is characterized as a solver-in-solver situation. [Pg.497]

Using a solver technique (we have used the solver add-in in Microsoft Excel 6.0 ), one can calculate the 3 molecular descriptors (H-bond acidity, H-bond basicity and polarisability-dipolarity). Plass et al. 1122] published the molecular descriptors of tripeptide derivatives based on the above-described method. Although reasonably sensible data were obtained, the method has not yet been validated on a large number of... [Pg.581]

Scientists, on the other hand, are sophisticated problem solvers. Not only are the proposing of hypotheses, the designing of experiments to prove or disprove them, and the drawing of valid conclusions from correlation of data complex intellectual processes that require much more than imagination and system-atics, but the capacity to interpret the often circuitous and intricate data nature offers as a response to our keenly designed experiments is a challenging daily situation in the successful scientific laboratory. [Pg.7]

Enwald, H., Peirano, E., Almstedt, A.E., and Leckner, B. (1999), Simulation of the fluid dynamics of a bubbling fluidized bed. Experimental validation of the two-fluid model and evaluation of a parallel multiblock solver, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54, 311-328. [Pg.401]

The SOLVER module is the communications link between the three numerical analysis service modules NONLIN, SIMULATOR, and CURVEFIT. SOLVER solves the equations that were chosen by SELECTOR by using (1) NONLIN — to initially bring the system to equilibrium, (2) SIMULATOR — to generate concentration data for certain unknown variable parameters and (3) CURVEFIT — to solve for unknown constant parameters and to test the mathematical validity of the proposed reaction model. The SOLVER module has been designed so that the three numerical analysis service modules are easily replacable as more advanced techniques are developed. The design of the SOLVER module is described in detail in Part 4. The modules NONLIN, SIMULATOR, and CURVEFIT are discussed in 4.2., 4.3., and 4.4., respectively. [Pg.47]

T 3. [Eliminate Extra Known Equilibrium Constants.] Let TFLUX be the transpose of FLUX. Call DMFGR [TFLUX (IKEK - - 1,1), NKEK. NRCT, IRANK], For IRANK least squares technique were used to solve for the unknown equilibirum constants, this step would not be necessary. However, mathematical validation of the model would not then be possible. [Pg.53]

One can of course fit experimental data to the entire, theoretical curve with a non-linear least-squares routine such as Solver. In this particular case, however, the direct, non-iterative method of using Gran plots provides a valid, simpler alternative. As illustrated below, such plots are quite linear, analogous to the Gran plots for the titration of strong acids and bases. [Pg.199]

Hydrolysis and fermentation models were developed using two hydrolysis datasets and two SSF datasets and by using modified Michaelis-Menten and Monod-type kinetics. Validation experiments made to represent typical kitchen waste correlated well with both models. The models were generated in Matlab Simulink and represent a simple method for implementing ODE system solvers and parameter estimation tools. These types of visual dynamic models may be useful for applying kinetic or linear-based metabolic engineering of bioconversion processes in the future. [Pg.390]

A new numerical solver RF-RTM for the reactive transport in fractured porous media was investigated. The simulator RF-RTM is a three-dimensional model, that can consider several nonequilibrium kinetic type models. This paper illustrates the accuracy with the finite element model for simulating decay reactions in fractured porous media. The presented results show the capability of RF-RTM to simulate transport of one or more species. The finite element model RF-RTM was verified for several situations when sorption occurs imder equilibrium conditions such as in Example 1 and 5, or in case of matrix diffusion such as in Example 4. Validation of the nonequilibrium model was shown in Example 3. The nonequilibrium model is verified only for homogenous media. Numerical modelling of the decay chain reactions in fractured porous media with a nonequilibrimn sorption model is treated for the first time. Especially the different penetrations of decay chain components in a fiacture-matrix system was illustrated through a series of simulations (see Example 6). Further research is needed to quantify the effect of nonlinear sorption in the migration of the contaminants with sequentially deca3ong processes in fractured porous media. [Pg.113]

A network-optimization system that solves the problem presented above utilizes large amounts of data and must have a reliable data interface in addition to the solver. The data interface extracts, verifies, and validates the data needed for the problem corresponding to the particular geographical area applicable to the problem. It then generates the network and, after the solver is applied, produces reports of the results. The solver consists of optimization algorithms that obtain solutions of the problem. [Pg.805]

However, it will be very important to ensure that there has been no shipping/storage/handling damage, that all sensors and final elements are correctly connected to the logic solver, that the safety instrumented functions perform properly and that the operator interface provides the necessary information. The equivalent of a proof test is strongly recommended in order to claim SIS validation, because a separate test of the logic solver and the field elements does not equal a complete end-to-end proof test. [Pg.67]

The set of equations (10.5-22) is quite readily handled by the numerical method of orthogonal collocation. Basically, the coupled partial differential equations (eq. 10.5-22) are discretized in the sense that the spatial domain r is discretized into N collocation points, and the governing equation is valid at these points. In this way, the coupled partial differential equations will become coupled ordinary differential equations in terms of concentrations at those points. These resulting coupled ODEs are function of time and are solved by any standard ODE solver. Details of the orthogonal collocation analysis are given in Appendix 10.5, and a computer code ADSORB3A is provided with this book for the readers to learn interactively and explore the simulation of this model. [Pg.663]


See other pages where Solver validation is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.902]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.839]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.988]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.158]   


SEARCH



Solver

© 2024 chempedia.info