Solid rejection value

Relationship between confidence intervals and results of a significance test, (a) The shaded area under the normal distribution curves shows the apparent confidence intervals for the sample based on fexp. The solid bars in (b) and (c) show the actual confidence intervals that can be explained by indeterminate error using the critical value of (a,v). In part (b) the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In part (c) the null hypothesis is retained. 

It is common that compressor manufacturers provide data for the ratio of the heat rejected at the condenser to the refrigeration capacity as shown in Fig. 11-89. The solid line represents data for the open compressors while the dotted hne represents the hermetic and accessible compresors. The difference between sohd and dotted line is due to all losses (mechanical and elec trical in the electrical motor). Condenser design is based on the value ... 

FIGURE 11.22 Control charts and outliers, (a) pEC50 values (ordinates) run as a quality control for a drug screen over the days on which the screen is run (abscissae). Dotted lines are the 95% c.l. and the solid lines the 99.7% c.l. Data points that drift beyond the action lines indicate significant concern over the quality of the data obtained from the screen on those days, (b) The effect of significant outliers on the criteria for rejection. For the data set shown, the inclusion of points A and B lead to a c.l. for 95% confidence that includes point B. Removal of point A causes the 95% limits to fall below points B, causing them to be suspect as well. Thus, the presence of the data to be possibly rejected affects the criteria for rejection of other data. 

Liquid paraffins, particularly those of low viscosity, have been used and are said to be of value for colored tablets, and even the use of modified vegetables has been attempted. However, they appear, in general, to offer little advantage over solid lubricants, and their incorporation into the precompression mixture is more difficult, requiring solution in a volatile liquid that is then sprayed onto the unlubricated material. Due to handling and EPA requirements, these materials are often rejected in the preformulation stage. 

Plotting the parabola (broken curve) on the left of (1.40) with the rectangular hyperbola (solid curve) on the right (Fig. 1.4) shows that this cubic equation in eJlk has three roots given by the intersections pi, P2 and p3. However, since eJlk 1 at pi, this root is rejected, so (1.40) has two real solutions, P2 and p3, whose corresponding /rfc-values give rise to two P-states. 

The Q (initial reaction rate) plots were presented in Fig. 19. Note again that the data may be correlated well by straight lines for both models. The C2 values are correlated by the solid lines of Fig 20. Note that the dual-site values can again be correlated by a straight line, but that the single-site values of C2 show a definite curvature. Alternatively, the 0.975 atm value of the single-site C2 could be rejected, and the three high-pressure points... 

Solution The surface tension of liquid naphthalene (1) is greater than that of solid naphthalene (3). Therefore A312 is expected to be negative for all systems having 7 values greater than 7.,. This is the case for the first six compounds listed in Table 10.6. Therefore these substances are expected to display rejection by the solidification front. This is indeed observed for five of the six cases. The case of nylon-6,12, which deviates from the predicted behavior, is best understood by examining the product (73s - 711/2)(72/2 - y]12)- Values of this product for the various systems considered are listed in Table 10.6. The factor arising from the solid-liquid (3-1) naphthalene has the constant value -0.0186 for all cases, but differs when various solids are used as component 2. For nylon-6,12, the second factor becomes -0.0022, and the product of the two, 0.41 10 4 mJ m 2, is the smallest of all such products listed in the table. As the surface tension difference decreases, the sensitivity of the behavior to variations in d0 increases. ... 

Generally, the flow field is assumed as a laminar flow, due to the relatively low velocities that the air reaches inside the cell. Nevertheless, Campanari and Iora (2004) performed a fluid dynamic calculation of the flow in the air injection tube and in the annular section of the cell the results indicated a transition from laminar to turbulent flow the values of the Reynolds number found were in some cases above 1000, whereas the transition between laminar and turbulent flow is stated to be in the range between Re = 750 and Re = 2700. The regime of the flow affects the heat exchange between the gas and the solid material and the diffusion of chemical species. Li and Suzuki (2004) too performed similar calculations and found values of the Reynolds number that were consistent with a regime transition in the air injection tube, but not for the annular section (Re = 385 with a velocity lower than 7.82 m/s). Li and Chyu (2003) state that the assumption of laminar flow is to be rejected. Other researchers, such as Haynes and Wepfer (2001) previously and Stiller et al. (2005) later, assume laminar flow. 

Various techniques are available to separate the different types of particles that may be present in a solid mixture. The choice depends on the physicochemical nature of the solids and on site-specific considerations (for example, wet versus dry methods). A key consideration is the extent of the liberation of the individual particles to be separated. Particles attached to each other obviously cannot be separated by direct mechanical means except after the attachment has been broken. In ore processing, the mineral values are generally liberated by size reduction (see Sec. 20). Rarely is liberation complete at any one size, and a physical-separation flow sheet will incorporate a sequence of operations that often are designed first to reject as much... 

Platinum Pentafluoride.—This is best prepared by the medium-temperature fluorination of platinum dichloride.i It is a deep red solid which melts at 80 to a viscous red liquid. The ready disproportionation, 2PtFg— PtFg -f- PtF, prevents purification by distillation. Reliable boiling-point determination is not possible and our earlier value must be rejected, since that observed was of tetrafluoride dissolved in pentafluoride. 

Acidulated soybean soapstock is the product obtained from the complete acidulation and thorough setting of soapstock, which itself is the by-product obtained from the alkali refining of soybean oil. It is sold on a basis of 95% total fatty acid content. If it falls below 85% total fatty acid content, it may be rejected. Typical analyses are TFAs, 90% moisture, 1% and iodine value 125. In practice, soybean soapstock may be found in combinations with other vegetable oil soapstocks. The buyer should determine if cottonseed soapstock is present, as it may contain gossypol, which is detrimental in nonruminant feeds. Physical properties are medium brown color odor somewhat typical of soybeans, slightly nutty solid when cool and liquid and pumpable at 38 14°C (100-110°F). It qualifies under AAFCO 33.3, IFN 4-17-893 (31). 

Conventional treatment or media filtration can reduce the suspended solids load by a factor of two (Suratt (1993)). This value seems very low and depends on the suspended solids characteristics. Gusses et at. (1997) stated that conventional treatment was not a sufficient pretreatment for NF. A combination of coagulation, ozonation, and biological treatment was a better alternative. Glucina et al. (1997) confirmed the inadequacy of conventional pretreatment for NF. UF pretreatment was more effective than MF in the long term regarding flux, while rejection of the NF membrane was independent of pretreatment. 

Conductivity is an indicator of total dissolved solids (TDS) in water. In this case conductivitj was used to observe overall salt rejection of the RO membrane during operation. Conductivity in all process streams at the start and at the completion of operation is shown Figure A1.12 and Figure A1.13. During the first concentration cycle the RO concentrate conductivity increased due to the low permeability of the membrane towards ions. The start value was about 100 pS, and the final value was 2.2 mS representing an increase of approximately 20 times, corresponding to the concentration factor of that day. 

---