Simple liquid-state model

Electrons in an electric field carry out two types of movements, (1) a random motion due to their interaction with the atoms or molecules of the medium and (2) a directed motion parallel to the electric field lines. In order to analyze the dependence of the electron mobility on the electric field, two problems must be solved (Shockley, 1951) first, the individual scattering processes must be analyzed, and second, the statistics of the electron collective must be worked out. In the following discussion we adopt simple concepts developed for the solid-state. 

The electron/molecule (atom) interaction in pure liquids consists of absorption and emission of phonons and the equilibrium is characterized by the condition that the thermal energy of the electrons is equal to the thermal energy of the liquid. Since the electron mass is much smaller than the mass of an atom or molecule, their thermal velocity, v, is rather high. Taking the rest mass of an electron (m = 9.1 x 10 kg) at Tjiq = 295 K, a thermal velocity of 

Tjn denotes the mean time between subsequent collisions (momentum relaxation time). The electrons move with a constant drift velocity which is proportional to the applied electric field strength, E, such that 

The proportionality constant is the low field mobility, such that 

The rate of energy supplied by the electric field is balanced by the rate of energy loss due to collisions. 

---

Most nonpolarizable water models are actually fragile in this regard they are not transferable to temperatures or densities far from where they were parameterized. Because of the emphasis on transferability, polarizable models are typically held to a higher standard and are expected to reproduce monomer and dimer properties for which nonpolarizable liquid-state models are known to fail. Consequently, several of the early attempts at polarizable models were in fact less successful at ambient conditions than the benchmark nonpolarizable models, (simple point charge) and TIP4P (transfer-... 

Here we consider a simple two state model of liquid, which corresponds to the weak-coupling limit of our two order-parameter model [25,37]. We first estimate how the average fraction of locally favored structures, S, increases with a decrease... 

Later, Berlin et al. (1978) refined their theoretical model and derived different quasifree mobilities for each individual hydrocarbon, ranging from 27 cm V %" for n-hexane to 440 cm V" s" for neopentane. It should be mentioned that the electron mobility observed at room temperature in single crystals of paraffins is of the order of 1 cm V s" (see Section 10.2). The melting process changes the mobility only by a factor of 2 to 3 (see Section 1.1). From these divergent results it seems questionable if the simple two-state model could explain in a general form all the intricacies of the excess electron mobility in liquid hydrocarbons. 

In the theory of the liquid state, the hard-sphere model plays an important role. For hard spheres, the pair interaction potential V r) = qo for r < J, where d is the particle diameter, whereas V(r) = 0 for r s d. The stmcture of a simple fluid, such as argon, is very similar to that of a hard-sphere fluid. Hard-sphere atoms do, of course, not exist. Certain model colloids, however, come very close to hard-sphere behaviour. These systems have been studied in much detail and some results will be quoted below. 

To go from experimental observations of solvent effects to an understanding of them requires a conceptual basis that, in one approach, is provided by physical models such as theories of molecular structure or of the liquid state. As a very simple example consider the electrostatic potential energy of a system consisting of two ions of charges Za and Zb in a medium of dielectric constant e. 

Although simple, a model system containing one solvent molecule together with one ion already provides valuable insight into the nature of the ion-solvent interaction. There is also convincing evidence that this two body potential dominates in much more complicated situations like in the liquid state 88,89,162). Molecular data for one to one complexes can be calculated with sufficient accuracy within reasonable time limits. Gas-phase data reported in Chapter III provide a direct basis for comparison of the calculated results. 

Figure 13.1a shows reduced vapor pressures and Fig. 13.1b reduced liquid molar densities for the parent isotopomers of the reference compounds. Such data can be fit to acceptable precision with an extended four parameter CS model, for example using a modified Van der Waals equation. In each case the parameters are defined in terms of the three critical properties plus one system specific parameter (e.g. Pitzer acentric factor). Were simple corresponding states theory adequate, the data for all... 

We present here a simple model where long-range and nonadditivity of the correlations can be studied explicitly in terms of the ligand-ligand, and ligand-site interactions. With this model we can clearly see the different behavior of the three models discussed in previous sections and, by generalization, we shall see that the same mechanism applies for correlations between particles in the liquid state. 

In the general case of several electrolytes present in the solutions in contact with the liquid junction, no simple result analogous to (2.6.10) can be obtained. A basic problem stems from the fact that the electrolyte distribution in the liquid junction is dependent on time, so that the liquid-junction potential is also time-dependent. Because of these complications, further discussion will consider only those liquid-junction models where a stationary state has been attained, so that the liquid-junction potential is independent of time. This condition is notably fulfilled in liquid junctions in porous diaphragms. 

In the present article, we focus on the scaled particle theory as the theoretical basis for interpreting the static solution properties of liquid-crystalline polymers. It is a statistical mechanical theory originally proposed to formulate the equation of state of hard sphere fluids [11], and has been applied to obtain approximate analytical expressions for the thermodynamic quantities of solutions of hard (sphero)cylinders [12-16] or wormlike hard spherocylinders [17, 18]. Its superiority to the Onsager theory lies in that it takes higher virial terms into account, and it is distinctive from the Flory theory in that it uses no artificial lattice model. We survey this theory for wormlike hard spherocylinders in Sect. 2, and compare its predictions with typical data of various static solution properties of liquid-crystalline polymers in Sects. 3-5. As is well known, the wormlike chain (or wormlike cylinder) is a simple yet adequate model for describing dilute solution properties of stiff or semiflexible polymers. 

Another moderately successful approach to the theory of diffusion in liquids is that developed by Eyring (E4) in connection with his theory of absolute reaction rates (P6, K6). This theory attempts to explain the transport phenomena on the basis of a simple model for the liquid state and the basic molecular process occurring. It is assumed in this theory that there is some unimolecular rate process in terms of which the transport processes can be described, and it is further assumed that in this process there is some configuration that can be identified as the activated state. Then the Eyring theory of reaction rates is applied to this elementary process. 

In the following sections, we shah demonstrate that the observed behavior of electro-optic activity with chromophore number density can be quantitatively explained in terms of intermolecular electrostatic interactions treated within a self-consistent framework. We shall consider such interactions at various levels to provide detailed insight into the role of both electronic and nuclear (molecular shape) interactions. Treatments at several levels of mathematical sophistication will be discussed and both analytical and numerical results will be presented. The theoretical approaches presented here also provide a bridge to the fast-developing area of ferro- and antiferroelectric liquid crystals [219-222]. Let us start with the simplest description of our system possible, namely, that of the Ising model [223,224]. This model is a simple two-state representation of the to-... 

To get an idea about the relative volatilities of components we proceed with a simple flash of the outlet reactor mixture at 33 °C and 9 bar. The selection of the thermodynamic method is important since the mixture contains both supercritical and condensable components, some highly polar. From the gas-separation viewpoint an equation of state with capabilities for polar species should be the first choice, as SR-Polar in Aspen Plus [16]. From the liquid-separation viewpoint liquid-activity models are recommended, such as Wilson, NRTL or Uniquac, with the Hayden O Connell option for handling the vapor-phase dimerization of the acetic acid [3]. Note that SR-Polar makes use of interaction parameters for C2H4, C2H6 and C02, but neglects the others, while the liquid-activity models account only for the interactions among vinyl acetate, acetic acid and water. To overcome this problem a mixed manner is selected, in which the condensable components are treated by a liquid-activity model and the gaseous species by the Henry law. 

Let us derive a dynamic model of the process with control structure CS2 included. A rigorous model of the reactor and the two distillation columns would be quite complex and of very high order. Because the dynamics of the liquid-phase reactor are much slower than the dynamics of the separation section in this process, we can develop a simple second-order model by assuming the separation section dynamics are instantaneous. Thus the separation section is always at steady state and is achieving its specified performance, i.e, product and recycle purities are at their setpoints. Given a flowrate F and the composition zA/zB of the reactor effluent stream, the flowrates of the light and heavy recycle streams D, and B-L can be calculated from the algebraic equations... 

We can account for this behavior in terms of the simple model shown in Fig. 17.13. The presence of the solute lowers the rate at which molecules in the liquid return to the solid state. Thus for an aqueous solution only the liquid state is found at 0°C. As the solution is cooled, the rate at which water molecules leave the solid ice decreases until this rate and the rate of forma-... 

---