Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Shapiro-Wilk test

The results were analysed by a within-subjects analysis of variance for factors of trial (1,2,3) and odour type (almond, cKl, water). The data were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilks tests). Planned contrasts compared each of the two odours with the control odour. Only significant results are reported. The results for each behaviour were analysed separately. Four of the trials were videotaped to enable intra-and inter-rater reliability to be assessed for the observations. There was 100% concordance for both intra- and inter-rater codings. [Pg.107]

Some statistical tests are specific for evaluation of normality (log-normality, etc., normality of a transformed variable, etc.), while other tests are more broadly applicable. The most popular test of normality appears to be the Shapiro-Wilk test. Specialized tests of normality include outlier tests and tests for nonnormal skewness and nonnormal kurtosis. A chi-square test was formerly the conventional approach, but that approach may now be out of date. [Pg.44]

Secondly we have a statistical test, the Shapiro-Wilks test, which gives a p-value for the following setting ... [Pg.162]

Normal Distribution is a continuous probability distribution that is useful in characterizing a large variety of types of data. It is a symmetric, bell-shaped distribution, completely defined by its mean and standard deviation and is commonly used to calculate probabilities of events that tend to occur around a mean value and trail off with decreasing likelihood. Different statistical tests are used and compared the y 2 test, the W Shapiro-Wilks test and the Z-score for asymmetry. If one of the p-values is smaller than 5%, the hypothesis (Ho) (normal distribution of the population of the sample) is rejected. If the p-value is greater than 5% then we prefer to accept the normality of the distribution. The normality of distribution allows us to analyse data through statistical procedures like ANOVA. In the absence of normality it is necessary to use nonparametric tests that compare medians rather than means. [Pg.329]

Second, a univariate test for normality is usually conducted. Many software packages have these built-in to their procedures, e.g., Shapiro Wilks test in the Uni-... [Pg.138]

FIGURE 8.A2 Distribution of the dmg naive matrix sample results without the outliers. These data are similar to Fig. 8. Ala and b, without the outliers. After excluding the outliers identified from the box plot approach, data in the logarithmic scale (panel b) is closer to a normal distribution and is confirmed by the Shapiro Wilk test for normality. The p value of 0.1316 suggests that the distribution of the log transformed data is not significantly non normal. [Pg.230]

Activity was measured by coimting the number of times each salamander crossed fl om one substrate to another (i.e. from water to treatment) during the first 15 minutes of the trial. We used this time interval, as opposed to the full 60 minutes, because salamander activity tends to dimmish after 20 minutes in the test dish, and any activity differences between control and experimental treatments are most evident during this initial period (Madison et al., 1999b). A post hoc analysis revealed that the activity data was not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, P<0.05), so a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare activity between treatments. [Pg.360]

Results were analyzed by performing the following steps (1) We performed a descriptive analysis of the collected data. (2) We tested the data for normality using a Shapiro-Wilk test [18]. (3) Since the data were not normally distributed, we performed a Median test for independent samples or a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for dependent samples with a significance level of 0.05 to test our hypotheses. [Pg.439]

To substantiate, in the absence of evidence versus normality of variable. Table 3 shown the results test of skewness and, kurtosis besides Shapiro-Wilk test and, Shapiro-Francia test which are known by their validity in small samples. None test denies the normality of the variables, (p-value > 0.33). [Pg.58]

The Table 2 shows the results of several tests run to determine whether data can be adequately modeled by a normal distribution. The Shapiro-Wilk test is based upon comparing the quantiles of the fitted normal distribution to the quantiles of the data. The standardized skewness test looks for lack of symmetry in the data. The standardized... [Pg.358]

Few tests are available for checking assumption (2). However, this task is not always meaningful since the available tests always need a consistent number of repetitions of the analysis of the examined concentration level, a condition rarely verified when developing EBs. The Shapiro-Wilk test can be performed by using at least three replicates, " but the result obtained by using such a low number of data is hardly significant. [Pg.425]

After analysis of basic statistics and Shapiro-Wilk normality test, it was concluded that the data did not assure the normality conditions necessary to perform certain statistical analysis. To follow usual procedures the data were lognormalised and normality was tested by normal probability curves. [Pg.320]

Shapiro Wilks W-test for normal data Shapiro Wilks W-test for exponential data Maximum studentlzed residual Median of deviations from sample median Andrew s rho for robust regression Classical methods of multiple comparisons Multivariate methods... [Pg.44]

Small departures of normality do not significantly influence the use of the calibration model in residue analysis. However, major departures of normality are mostly related to analytical or instrumental problems. The use of an inappropriate calibration model can give rise to nonnormality of the residuals. In this case also, one or more of the other four basic assumptions have been violated. Normality can be evaluated by means of several statistical tests (i.e., Kolgomorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk W) or by constructing normal probability plots [8]. [Pg.146]

In terms of the statistical methods of the partial life cycle whole-effluent tests, survival, growth, and reproduction data from the 7 day cladoceran or fish exposure are often analyzed using hypothesis testing to determine acceptable concentrations. In order to determine the appropriateness of using parametric statistical methods, the data are first tested for normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance, for which the US EPA recommends the use of Shapiro-Wilk s test and Bartlett s test, respectively. Kolmogorov test for normality and Levine s test for homogeneity can be also used for these purposes. Dunnett s anova test is typically used for a... [Pg.964]

Similar figures are obtained for the other chemical-species combinations and the near uniformity (Figure 27.2) of the distribution of Shapiro-Wilk p values (Royston 1993, 1995) obtained by testing for lognormality all 166 chemical-... [Pg.685]

Since the distribution of the log-transformed data after removing these outliers satisfied the Shapiro Wilk normality test (Fig. 8. A2b), the cut point determination for these validation data was made using the parametric method (i.e., mean + 1.645 x SD). The threshold 1.645 for normally distributed data ensures 5% false-positive rate. This cut point of the log-transformed values of the sample replicate means was determined for each analyst, each assay run, and for all the data combined (Table 8.A2). [Pg.229]

Descriptive statistics—mean, median, trimmed means, standard deviation and standard error, variance, minimum, maximum, range, interquartile range, skewness, kurtosis Frequency statistics—outlier identification boxplots, stem-and-leaf plots, and histograms Frequency statistics—description percentiles, probability plots, robust estimates or M-estimators, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk normality tests Variance homogeneity—Levene s test for equality of variance... [Pg.61]

Having removed the outlying observations, the implied normal distribution is checked by Shapiro-Wilk s test. Figure. 5a shows the QQ-plot and Figure f5b the autocorrelation values for the trimmed time series of inflow rates. [Pg.148]

In the exploratory phase of any data analysis it is expedient to calculate means, standard deviation medians, skewness, and kurtosis of variables. They are important indicators of the distribution of data. Box and Whisker plot using median reveals easily the asymmetry in the distribution. If the number of data makes it possible, it is worth to plot the histogram of each variable and test the normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk s test, etc.). If the number of variables is... [Pg.160]

Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete samples). Biometrika 52 591-611 Sidak Z (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Statist Assoc 62 626-631... [Pg.181]


See other pages where Shapiro-Wilk test is mentioned: [Pg.37]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.2791]    [Pg.1853]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.2791]    [Pg.1853]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.1852]    [Pg.180]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 ]




SEARCH



Shapiro-Wilks tests

Shapiro-Wilks tests

Shapiro-Wilk’s test

WILKE

© 2024 chempedia.info