Skewness test

In 50 g/1 solid caustic yields a product that has very good detergency, low foam, and a wetting time (via Draves Cotton Skew Test) of agent 10-13 seconds. 

The Table 2 shows the results of several tests run to determine whether data can be adequately modeled by a normal distribution. The Shapiro-Wilk test is based upon comparing the quantiles of the fitted normal distribution to the quantiles of the data. The standardized skewness test looks for lack of symmetry in the data. The standardized... 

On occasion, a data set appears to be skewed by the presence of one or more data points that are not consistent with the remaining data points. Such values are called outliers. The most commonly used significance test for identifying outliers is Dixon s Q-test. The null hypothesis is that the apparent outlier is taken from the same population as the remaining data. The alternative hypothesis is that the outlier comes from a different population, and, therefore, should be excluded from consideration. 

Initial evaluations of chemicals produced for screening are performed by smelling them from paper blotters. However, more information is necessary given the time and expense required to commercialize a new chemical. No matter how pleasant or desirable a potential odorant appears to be, its performance must be studied and compared with available ingredients in experimental fragrances. A material may fail to Hve up to the promise of its initial odor evaluation for a number of reasons. It is not at all uncommon to have a chemical disappear in a formulation or skew the overall odor in an undesirable way. Some materials are found to be hard to work with in that their odors stick out and caimot be blended weU. Because perfumery is an individuaHstic art, it is important to have more than one perfumer work with a material of interest and to have it tried in several different fragrance types. Aroma chemicals must be stable in use if their desirable odor properties are to reach the consumer. Therefore, testing in functional product appHcations is an important part of the evaluation process. Other properties that can be important for new aroma chemicals are substantivity on skin and cloth, and the abiHty to mask certain malodors. 

Skew distribution Any set of values measured during a test that is not symmetrically distributed. 

All the references to burn-out have thus far been concerned with uniformly heated channels, apart from some of the rod bundles where the heat flux varies from one rod to another, but which respond to analysis in terms of the average heat flux. In a nuclear-reactor situation, however, the heat flux varies along the length of a channel, and to find what effect this may have, some burn-out experiments on round tubes and annuli have been done using, for example, symmetrical or skewed-cosine axial heat-flux profiles. Tests with axial non-uniform heating in a rod bundle have not yet been reported. 

Fig. 40. Test of the Barnett local-conditions hypothesis applied to a tube with a skewed-cosine heat-flux profile [from Barnett (B4)]. Fluid water, d = 0.422 in., L — 12 in., P = 2000 psia.

A problem long appreciated in economic evaluations, but whose seriousness has perhaps been underestimated (Sturm et al, 1999), is that a sample size sufficient to power a clinical evaluation may be too small for an economic evaluation. This is mainly because the economic criterion variable (cost or cost-effectiveness) shows a tendency to be highly skewed. (One common source of such a skew is that a small proportion of people in a sample make high use of costly in-patient services.) This often means that a trade-off has to be made between a sample large enough for a fully powered economic evaluation, and an affordable research study. Questions also need to be asked about what constitutes a meaningful cost or cost-effectiveness difference, and whether the precision (type I error) of a cost test could be lower than with an effectiveness test (O Brien et al, 1994). 

The test presented in the previous section is useful when a smaller probability of false detection is needed than is provided by the distribution-free test. However, the test in the previous section is no panacea. Reduction of the skewness through proper choice of sampling and subsampling procedures is an alternative that may have much more potential for improving the study. 

The Knoop test is a microhardness test. In microhardness testing the indentation dimensions are comparable to microstructural ones. Thus, this testing method becomes useful for assessing the relative hardnesses of various phases or microconstituents in two phase or multiphase alloys. It can also be used to monitor hardness gradients that may exist in a solid, e.g., in a surface hardened part. The Knoop test employs a skewed diamond indentor shaped so that the long and short diagonals of the indentation are approximately in the ratio 7 1. The Knoop hardness number (KHN) is calculated as the force divided by the projected indentation area. The test uses low loads to provide small indentations required for microhardness studies. Since the indentations are very small their dimensions have to be measured under an optical microscope. This implies that the surface of the material is prepared approximately. For those reasons, microhardness assessments are not as often used industrially as are other hardness tests. However, the use of microhardness testing is undisputed in research and development situations. 

The p-value for the sign test or Wilcoxon signed rank test can be found in the pValue variable in the pvalue data set. If the variable is from a symmetric distribution, you can get the p-value from the Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the Test variable in the pvalue data set is Signed Rank. If the variable is from a skewed distribution, you can get the p-value from the sign test, where the Test variable in the pvalue data set is Sign. ... 

To determine whether the skew was responsible for the taxonic findings, Gleaves et al. transformed the data using a square root or log transformation and were successful at reducing the skew of all but one indicator to less than 1.0. This is a fairly conservative test of the taxonic Conjecture, because data transformation not only reduces indicator skew, but it can also reduce indicator validities, and hence produce a nontaxonic result. Yet, this did not happen in this study. All but one plot originally rated as taxonic were still rated as taxonic after the transformation. MAMBAC base rate estimates were. 19 (SD =. 18) for transformed empirical indicators, and. 24 (SD =. 06) for transformed theoretical indicators. Nevertheless, these estimates are probably not as reliable as the original estimates because of the possible reduction in validity, which is likely to lower the precision of the estimates. 

Mendal et al. (1993) compared eight tests of normality to detect a mixture consisting of two normally distributed components with different means but equal variances. Fisher s skewness statistic was preferable when one component comprised less than 15% of the total distribution. When the two components comprised more nearly equal proportions (35-65%) of the total distribution, the Engelman and Hartigan test (1969) was preferable. For other mixing proportions, the maximum likelihood ratio test was best. Thus, the maximum likelihood ratio test appears to perform very well, with only small loss from optimality, even when it is not the best procedure. 

The first is to normalize the data, making them suitable for analysis by our most common parametric techniques such as analysis of variance ANOYA. A simple test of whether a selected transformation will yield a distribution of data which satisfies the underlying assumptions for ANOYA is to plot the cumulative distribution of samples on probability paper (that is a commercially available paper which has the probability function scale as one axis). One can then alter the scale of the second axis (that is, the axis other than the one which is on a probability scale) from linear to any other (logarithmic, reciprocal, square root, etc.) and see if a previously curved line indicating a skewed distribution becomes linear to indicate normality. The slope of the transformed line gives us an estimate of the standard deviation. If... 

The basis of all performance criteria are prediction errors (residuals), yt - yh obtained from an independent test set, or by CV or bootstrap, or sometimes by less reliable methods. It is crucial to document from which data set and by which strategy the prediction errors have been obtained furthermore, a large number of prediction errors is desirable. Various measures can be derived from the residuals to characterize the prediction performance of a single model or a model type. If enough values are available, visualization of the error distribution gives a comprehensive picture. In many cases, the distribution is similar to a normal distribution and has a mean of approximately zero. Such distribution can well be described by a single parameter that measures the spread. Other distributions of the errors, for instance a bimodal distribution or a skewed distribution, may occur and can for instance be characterized by a tolerance interval. 

Both assumptions are mainly needed for constructing confidence intervals and tests for the regression parameters, as well as for prediction intervals for new observations in x. The assumption of normal distribution additionally helps avoid skewness and outliers, mean 0 guarantees a linear relationship. The constant variance, also called homoscedasticity, is also needed for inference (confidence intervals and tests). This assumption would be violated if the variance of y (which is equal to the residual variance a2, see below) is dependent on the value of x, a situation called heteroscedasticity, see Figure 4.8. 

Some statistical tests are specific for evaluation of normality (log-normality, etc., normality of a transformed variable, etc.), while other tests are more broadly applicable. The most popular test of normality appears to be the Shapiro-Wilk test. Specialized tests of normality include outlier tests and tests for nonnormal skewness and nonnormal kurtosis. A chi-square test was formerly the conventional approach, but that approach may now be out of date. 

---