Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sensitivity limits, HPLC

In addition to the aforementioned methods, TLC in combination with other instrumental techniques have also been used for quantification of inorganic species. For example, two-dimensional TLC coupled with HPLC has been utilized for the separation and quantification of REEs in nuclear fuel fission products using silaiuzed silica gel as layer material [60]. In another interesting method, REEs in geological samples have been determined by ICP-AAS after their preconcentration by TLC on Fixion plates [32]. TLC in combination with neutron activation has been used to determine REE in rock samples on Eixion 50 x 8 layers with the sensitivity limit of 0.5 to 10 pg/g for 10- to 30-mg samples [41]. A combination of TLC and A AS has been utilized for the isolation and determination of zinc in forensic samples [27]. [Pg.354]

HPLC (in both NP and RP modes) is quite suitable for speciation by coupling to FAAS, ETAAS, ICP-MS and MIP-MS [571,572]. Coupling of plasma source mass spectrometry with chromatographic techniques offers selective detection with excellent sensitivity. For HPLC-ICP-MS detection limits are in the sub-ng to pg range [36]. Metal ion determination and speciation by LC have been reviewed [573,574] with particular regard to ion chromatography [575]. [Pg.243]

With capillary electrophoresis (CE), another modern primarily analytically oriented separation methodology has recently found its way into routine and research laboratories of the pharmaceutical industries. As the most beneficial characteristics over HPLC separations the extremely high efficiency leading to enhanced peak capacities and often better detectability of minor impurities, complementary selectivity profiles to HPLC due to a different separation mechanism as well as the capability to perform separations faster than by HPLC are frequently encountered as the most prominent advantages. On the negative side, there have to be mentioned detection sensitivity limitations due to the short path length of on-capillary UV detection, less robust methods, and occasionally problems with run-to-run repeatability. Nevertheless, CE assays have now been adopted by industrial labs as well and this holds in particular for enantiomer separations of chiral pharmaceuticals. While native cyclodextrins and their derivatives, respectively, are commonly employed as chiral additives to the BGEs to create mobility differences for the distinct enantiomers in the electric field, it could be demonstrated that cinchona alkaloids [128-130] and in particular their derivatives are applicable selectors for CE enantiomer separation of chiral acids [19,66,119,131-136]. [Pg.87]

Flow rate. The flow rate from the pump should be accurate, regardless of the system in which the pump is used. This means that the flow rate actually produced by the pump is the same as that dialled up on the front panel, and that this should not be affected by the rest of the HPLC system (for constant flow pumps, at least). The flow rate should be reproducible and practically free of pulsations. Pulsatile flow can limit the sensitivity of HPLC assays, resulting in a rhythmic variation in the apparent refractive index of the mobile phase flowing through the detector, which ultimately manifests itself in the chromatogram as baseline noise. Various means are employed to attempt to eliminate flow pulsation (see section 5.3). [Pg.99]

To enhance analytical sensitivity, some HPLC procedures incorporate precolumn derivatization with fluorescent and chemiluminescent reagents, thereby achieving detection limits in the femtomole range. Completely automated analyses of serotonin have been described, and some systems incorporate direct injection and online solid phase extrac-tion. For laboratories that may not have the equipment, staff, or experience to measure serotonin by HPLC, alternative technologies based on RIA and EIA are available as commercial test kits. These procedures are highly sensitive and... [Pg.1062]

Methodological development HPLC-ICP-MS 111 procedure was compared with ICP-MS-MS showing extended linear range and superior sensitivity (limit of quantification 0.1 ng Pt niL by ICP-MS versus 5 ng Pt ml. using MS-MS)... [Pg.241]

Some of the comparisons are described below, but the results must be interpreted with due caution particularly in view of continuing improvements in detector design. One report compared two coulometric detectors for catecholamine analysis and concluded that they were equivalent to current amperometric detectors. Another study compared wall-jet and thin-layer cell configurations. Other more comprehensive studies have been controversial. Forzy et al compared 11 detectors for the analysis of 5-hydroxyindoleactic acid (5-HIAA). They used the same HPLC system with each detector to determine linearity, repeatability, absolute sensitivity, limit of detection and stabilisation time. Driebergen and Benders evaluated 10 detectors with respect to their suitability for routine use in a pharmaceutical company using tetramethylbenzidine as the test compound. Both of these reports found similar relative results with respect to sensitivity and ease of use but stressed the importance of matching instrument to application. [Pg.49]

Detection in CE has to face two challenging problems, namely, small amounts of analytes injected and tiny peak volumes. To the present, UV-vis detector is, by far, the most widely adopted despite the short internal diameter of the capillary limits the concentration sensitivity. Among the different modes of CE, CZE coupled with UV detection is the most widely found for the analysis of opium alkaloids in different matrices [107-111]. Nevertheless, to avoid the major disadvantage of CE related to its lack of sensitivity compared to HPLC, various approaches to this sensitivity limitation have been developed, mostly by the use of preconcentratiOTi procedures such as sweeping techniques [112, 113] or held-amplihed sample injection (FASl) [107,108]. [Pg.4372]

Analysis of urine samples for the other Be vitamers is difficult due to high concentrations of other interfering compounds present in urine. Ubbink et al. (150) demonstrated that an anion exchange column cleanup procedure was effective in removing interfering urinary compounds. The purified urine extract was then analyzed by cation exchange HPLC and fluorescence detection. Urinary Bg vitamer excretion in a fasting person was below the sensitivity limit of the HPLC procedure used. However, the method was suitable to study urinary Bg vitamer excretion in pharmacokinetic studies of pyridoxine supplementation (150). [Pg.472]

The sensitivity of HPLC-NMR and the expected detection limits have been estimated for both ID H NMR and 2D NMR. All NMR experiments were carried out using a Bruker Avance 500 NMR spectrometer operating at an H observation frequency... [Pg.305]


See other pages where Sensitivity limits, HPLC is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.852]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.994]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.2128]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.589]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.127 ]




SEARCH



Sensitivity limits

© 2024 chempedia.info