Selectivity, supercritical

Critical Point Properties for Selected Supercritical Fluids... 

Table 12-1. Physical parameters of selected supercritical fluids.

Each patent has somewhat different features and claims. We select one patent for more detailed discussion to highlight certain technical facets of the process. First we explain the (often misunderstood) effect of water on the extractability of caffeine by selective supercritical carbon dioxide. A number of references report that dry carbon dioxide cannot extract caffeine from dry coffee, either green or roasted, but moist carbon dioxide can. The inability of dry carbon dioxide to extract caffeine from coffee should not be misconstrued to mean that dry carbon dioxide cannot dissolve neat caffeine. This same moist-versus-dry effect is experienced if, for example, methylene chloride is used to extract caffeine from coffee. Dry methylene chloride cannot decaffein-ate dry coffee but moistened coffee can be decaffeinated. It is thought that the caffeine is chemically bound in a chlorogenic acid structure present in the coffee bean. Thus, water somehow acts as a chemical agent it frees caffeine from its bound form in the coffee matrix in both the carbon dioxide and the methylene chloride processes. 

Barnabas, I. J., Dean, J. R., Hitchen, S. M., and Owen, S. P., Selective supercritical fluid extraction of organochlorine pesticides and herbicides from aqueous samples, J. Chromatogr. Sci, 32, 547-551, 1994. 

As outlined above, application of SCFs to heterogeneous catalysis is of great interest [49]. Selected supercritical fluids can extract high-molecular-weight hydrocarbons from catalyst micropores to avoid catalyst deactivation [50] or to reactivate spent catalyst [51]. This section describes the application of SCFs to alkylation reactions on solid acid catalysts [52,53]. 

Table 2 Critical Properties for Selected Supercritical Fluids Used in Chemical Reactions (58)... 

Selected Supercritical COj Operating Parameters for Extraction and Fractionation of Canola/Oilseed Rape... 

Several standard methods for the quantitative analysis of food samples are based on measuring the sample s mass following a selective solvent extraction. For example, the crude fat content in chocolate can be determined by extracting with ether for 16 h in a Soxhlet extractor. After the extraction is complete, the ether is allowed to evaporate, and the residue is weighed after drying at 100 °C. This analysis has also been accomplished indirectly by weighing a sample before and after extracting with supercritical GO2. 

Adsorption and Desorption Adsorbents may be used to recover solutes from supercritical fluid extracts for example, activated carbon and polymeric sorbents may be used to recover caffeine from CO9. This approach may be used to improve the selectivity of a supercritical fluid extraction process. SCF extraction may be used to regenerate adsorbents such as activated carbon and to remove contaminants from soil. In many cases the chemisorption is sufficiently strong that regeneration with CO9 is limited, even if the pure solute is quite soluble in CO9. In some cases a cosolvent can be added to the SCF to displace the sorbate from the sorbent. Another approach is to use water at elevated or even supercritical temperatures to facilitate desorption. Many of the principles for desorption are also relevant to extraction of substances from other substrates such as natural products and polymers. 

A method which uses supercritical fluid/solid phase extraction/supercritical fluid chromatography (SE/SPE/SEC) has been developed for the analysis of trace constituents in complex matrices (67). By using this technique, extraction and clean-up are accomplished in one step using unmodified SC CO2. This step is monitored by a photodiode-array detector which allows fractionation. Eigure 10.14 shows a schematic representation of the SE/SPE/SEC set-up. This system allowed selective retention of the sample matrices while eluting and depositing the analytes of interest in the cryogenic trap. Application to the analysis of pesticides from lipid sample matrices have been reported. In this case, the lipids were completely separated from the pesticides. 

B. R. Simmons and J. T. Stewait, Supercritical fluid exti action of selected phamaceuti-cals from water and semm , 7. Chromatogr. B 688 291-302 (1997). 

An on-line supercritical fluid chromatography-capillary gas chromatography (SFC-GC) technique has been demonstrated for the direct transfer of SFC fractions from a packed column SFC system to a GC system. This technique has been applied in the analysis of industrial samples such as aviation fuel (24). This type of coupled technique is sometimes more advantageous than the traditional LC-GC coupled technique since SFC is compatible with GC, because most supercritical fluids decompress into gases at GC conditions and are not detected by flame-ionization detection. The use of solvent evaporation techniques are not necessary. SFC, in the same way as LC, can be used to preseparate a sample into classes of compounds where the individual components can then be analyzed and quantified by GC. The supercritical fluid sample effluent is decompressed through a restrictor directly into a capillary GC injection port. In addition, this technique allows selective or multi-step heart-cutting of various sample peaks as they elute from the supercritical fluid... 

Another application of SFC-GC was for the isolation of chrysene, a poly aromatic hydrocarbon, from a complex liquid hydrocarbon industrial sample (24). A 5 p.m octadecyl column (200 cm X 4.6 mm i.d.) was used for the preseparation, followed by GC analysis on an SE-54 column (25 m X 0.2 mm i.d., 0.33 p.m film thickness). The direct analysis of whole samples transferred from the supercritical fluid chromatograph and selective and multi-heart-cutting of a particular region as it elutes from the SFC system was demonstrated. The heart-cutting technique allows the possibility of separating a trace component from a complex mixture (Figure 12.21). 

In order to reduce or eliminate off-line sample preparation, multidimensional chromatographic techniques have been employed in these difficult analyses. LC-GC has been employed in numerous applications that involve the analysis of poisonous compounds or metabolites from biological matrices such as fats and tissues, while GC-GC has been employed for complex samples, such as arson propellants and for samples in which special selectivity, such as chiral recognition, is required. Other techniques include on-line sample preparation methods, such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC and LC-GC-GC. In many of these applications, the chromatographic method is coupled to mass spectrometry or another spectrometiic detector for final confirmation of the analyte identity, as required by many courts of law. 

Although on-line sample preparation cannot be regarded as being traditional multidimensional chromatography, the principles of the latter have been employed in the development of many on-line sample preparation techniques, including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC, SPME, thermal desorption and other on-line extraction methods. As with multidimensional chromatography, the principle is to obtain a portion of the required selectivity by using an additional separation device prior to the main analytical column. 

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) provides a means of minimizing the limitations of CSPs developed for FC while retaining the impressive chiral selectivity that has been achieved through the evolution of CSPs during the past two decades [6, 7]. The use of supercritical fluids as eluents for chromatographic separations was... 

The high diffusivity and low viscosity of sub- and supercritical fluids make them particularly attractive eluents for enantiomeric separations. Mourier et al. first exploited sub- and supercritical eluents for the separation of phosphine oxides on a brush-type chiral stationary phase [28]. They compared analysis time and resolution per unit time for separations performed by LC and SFC. Although selectivity (a) was comparable in LC and SFC for the compounds studied, resolution was consistently... 

The efficiency of many CSPs increases dramatically when liquid eluents are replaced with sub- or supercritical fluids. During a comparison of LC and SFC performed with a Chiralcel OD CSP, Lynam and Nicolas reported that the number of theoretical plates obtained was three to five times higher in SFC than in LC [26]. The separation of metoprolol enantiomers by LC and SFC on a Chiralcel OD CSP is illustrated in Fig. 12-2. Although impressive selectivity is achieved by both techniques, resolution is higher in SFC (R = 12.7) than in LC (R = 4.8), and the higher flowrate in SFC reduces the analysis time. The increased efficiency of SFC also improves peak symmetry. 

---